This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Shtal on 23 September 2012 - 04:09
Hundmutter,
The full proper name is Australopithecus Africanus Lucy… Donald Hudson found Lucy in 1974. (Ethiopia) He had gone there with a grant to look for missing links, somebody gave him some money - said here, go find missing link if you don’t find one – no more money. Two weeks before his grant money expired he discovered Lucy. (Highly motivated I suspect) that would be suspect by the way in the court of law. Lucy was three feet tall; it is obviously chimpanzee of some kind, the bones of the scull was crushed thoroughly, could not tell anything about the scull, but when they put it together for your kids text book, they make it half human and half ape, they name it Lucy because they were listening to a song, Lucy in the sky with Diamonds, great popular back then, which by the way have initials LSD which must be on when they found this thing.
The knee joint that was labeled Lucy knee in national geographic was actually found mile in half away (1.5m) and 200 hundred feet deeper. The national geographic labeled Lucy’s knee, it’s not Lucy knee, its mile and half away (1.5m) for heaven sake okay. There is quite quarterversary about that knee joint still, but the knee joint is the best evidence they have Lucy was becoming a human; because an ape has a lower and upper leg in the straight line with each other, the human leg goes up to your knee and angles off to the side because your hips are wider than your knees. Lucy knee is angle off to the side (the Femur angled) and Donald said see that proves she is becoming a human. No, any monkey climbs trees has an angled femur, what he found is tree climbing monkey, its not proof its becoming a human. He said well the bones are slightly bigger than a regular ape, well that is true, but that doesn’t proof it becoming a human. The bones of a Clydesdale are slightly bigger than a regular horse; it doesn’t proof it becoming a truck for heaven sake okay. What he found was a heavy duty chimpanzee and probably pre-flood chimpanzee and everything was probably more heavy duty, if they are living longer and much healthier, that’s all they found. We have big horses and little horses today by the way. St. Louis Zoo put human feet on their Lucy display, not one feet bone or hand bone was found, not one... Every other Australopithecus has been found has curl toes. Professor David Menton in Washington University said the statue is a complete misrepresentation, it’s a big fancy word for lie, I prefer smaller words – it’s a lie. The Zoo director said; Zoo officials have no plans to knuckle under. We cannot be updating every exhibit based on every new piece of evidence. We look at the overall exhibit and the impression it creates. We think the overall impression this exhibit creates is correct. So you would lie to kids coming to your zoo just to get an impression across to them that the evolution is true, you mean your theory is more important than the facts; that is exactly correct, they will lie to the kids going through science and zoo just to make them believe this evolution theory. And you don’t need to come up with more nonsense as you call missing links, if you play this video exactly at 1:39:30 just click on video slide bar with your mouse and set the play at that time you will get more answers or just talk to me.
The full proper name is Australopithecus Africanus Lucy… Donald Hudson found Lucy in 1974. (Ethiopia) He had gone there with a grant to look for missing links, somebody gave him some money - said here, go find missing link if you don’t find one – no more money. Two weeks before his grant money expired he discovered Lucy. (Highly motivated I suspect) that would be suspect by the way in the court of law. Lucy was three feet tall; it is obviously chimpanzee of some kind, the bones of the scull was crushed thoroughly, could not tell anything about the scull, but when they put it together for your kids text book, they make it half human and half ape, they name it Lucy because they were listening to a song, Lucy in the sky with Diamonds, great popular back then, which by the way have initials LSD which must be on when they found this thing.
The knee joint that was labeled Lucy knee in national geographic was actually found mile in half away (1.5m) and 200 hundred feet deeper. The national geographic labeled Lucy’s knee, it’s not Lucy knee, its mile and half away (1.5m) for heaven sake okay. There is quite quarterversary about that knee joint still, but the knee joint is the best evidence they have Lucy was becoming a human; because an ape has a lower and upper leg in the straight line with each other, the human leg goes up to your knee and angles off to the side because your hips are wider than your knees. Lucy knee is angle off to the side (the Femur angled) and Donald said see that proves she is becoming a human. No, any monkey climbs trees has an angled femur, what he found is tree climbing monkey, its not proof its becoming a human. He said well the bones are slightly bigger than a regular ape, well that is true, but that doesn’t proof it becoming a human. The bones of a Clydesdale are slightly bigger than a regular horse; it doesn’t proof it becoming a truck for heaven sake okay. What he found was a heavy duty chimpanzee and probably pre-flood chimpanzee and everything was probably more heavy duty, if they are living longer and much healthier, that’s all they found. We have big horses and little horses today by the way. St. Louis Zoo put human feet on their Lucy display, not one feet bone or hand bone was found, not one... Every other Australopithecus has been found has curl toes. Professor David Menton in Washington University said the statue is a complete misrepresentation, it’s a big fancy word for lie, I prefer smaller words – it’s a lie. The Zoo director said; Zoo officials have no plans to knuckle under. We cannot be updating every exhibit based on every new piece of evidence. We look at the overall exhibit and the impression it creates. We think the overall impression this exhibit creates is correct. So you would lie to kids coming to your zoo just to get an impression across to them that the evolution is true, you mean your theory is more important than the facts; that is exactly correct, they will lie to the kids going through science and zoo just to make them believe this evolution theory. And you don’t need to come up with more nonsense as you call missing links, if you play this video exactly at 1:39:30 just click on video slide bar with your mouse and set the play at that time you will get more answers or just talk to me.
by SitasMom on 23 September 2012 - 05:09
by Shtal on 23 September 2012 - 08:09
Hundmutter,
I will personally give you something to think about, Two Moons already knows and many others too but perhaps you don't.
I will repost this just for you my dear Hundmutter.
The word “Evolution” has many meanings, only one of which is scientific.
The Bible says the animals will bring forth after their kind. Charlie Darwin wrote a book called:
The Origin of Species: You see the dog and the wolf are the same kind of animal but they are different species, he “Charlie” fooled everybody by changing the words from kind to species.
Last option what we have what it’s called Micro-Evolution; this is changes within the kinds; now that one happens, I will go alone with number #6 option. I think animals can produce variety offspring; you know - long hair, short hair, long legged, and short legged. That happens. But the first other five options of evolution are purely religious, it’s NOT science, we never observed any of those. And all evolutionist people all they give is example number #6 which there is no argument about – it happens. But then they imply that is somehow magically evidence for all other 5 options of evolution and it is NOT.
Christians people don't really use the word evolution as foundation but it can be used in this case for option number #6.
Option number 6# which is evolution is really not an evolution – all it is - variations between same types of creatures, any creature produce within its kind or maybe with minor or some little changes and evolutionist people calls it micro-evolution. When a dog produces another dog – it is still a dog and there is simply a lot of variety of different dogs.
(Chihuahua and German shepherd are completely different, but it’s still a dog) Example: They might have common ancestors like a wolf or coyote; lol but they are completely different from banana.... But some very smart scientist couldn’t figure that out!
But the Bible says: Animals will bring forth after their kind; that’s all they ever do – bring forth after their kind. (They don’t make brand new things.)
Evolution did not happen but just humanist thinking.
The theory of real evolution is when one creature completely changes to another creature which called Macro-Evolution - this is not scientific but a religion world view. But the real science is when we can see/observed, test and demonstrate…. So the Macro-evolution, Organic Evolution, Stellar and Planetary evolution, Chemical Evolution and Cosmic Evolution has never being observed and it’s not part of the fact or science.
And if you stop being wishful dumb, stop and think this material I provided and information about speed of light. How could light travel millions of light years across the universe, if the universe is only 6,000 years old. You will find answers in these two articles below:
http://www.creationtoday.org/how-could-light-travel-millions-of-years/
http://www.creationtoday.org/other-starlight-issues/
Shtal.
I will personally give you something to think about, Two Moons already knows and many others too but perhaps you don't.
I will repost this just for you my dear Hundmutter.
The word “Evolution” has many meanings, only one of which is scientific.
- Cosmic Evolution: the origin of time, space and matter, i.e. Big Bang.
- Chemical Evolution – the origin of higher elements from hydrogen.
- Stellar and Planetary evolution. Origin of stars and planets. (No one has ever seen a star form).
- Organic Evolution. Origin of Life.
- Macro-Evolution. Changing from one kind into another.
- Micro-Evolution. Variations within kinds. (Only this one has been observed).
The Bible says the animals will bring forth after their kind. Charlie Darwin wrote a book called:
The Origin of Species: You see the dog and the wolf are the same kind of animal but they are different species, he “Charlie” fooled everybody by changing the words from kind to species.
Last option what we have what it’s called Micro-Evolution; this is changes within the kinds; now that one happens, I will go alone with number #6 option. I think animals can produce variety offspring; you know - long hair, short hair, long legged, and short legged. That happens. But the first other five options of evolution are purely religious, it’s NOT science, we never observed any of those. And all evolutionist people all they give is example number #6 which there is no argument about – it happens. But then they imply that is somehow magically evidence for all other 5 options of evolution and it is NOT.
Christians people don't really use the word evolution as foundation but it can be used in this case for option number #6.
Option number 6# which is evolution is really not an evolution – all it is - variations between same types of creatures, any creature produce within its kind or maybe with minor or some little changes and evolutionist people calls it micro-evolution. When a dog produces another dog – it is still a dog and there is simply a lot of variety of different dogs.
(Chihuahua and German shepherd are completely different, but it’s still a dog) Example: They might have common ancestors like a wolf or coyote; lol but they are completely different from banana.... But some very smart scientist couldn’t figure that out!
But the Bible says: Animals will bring forth after their kind; that’s all they ever do – bring forth after their kind. (They don’t make brand new things.)
Evolution did not happen but just humanist thinking.
The theory of real evolution is when one creature completely changes to another creature which called Macro-Evolution - this is not scientific but a religion world view. But the real science is when we can see/observed, test and demonstrate…. So the Macro-evolution, Organic Evolution, Stellar and Planetary evolution, Chemical Evolution and Cosmic Evolution has never being observed and it’s not part of the fact or science.
And if you stop being wishful dumb, stop and think this material I provided and information about speed of light. How could light travel millions of light years across the universe, if the universe is only 6,000 years old. You will find answers in these two articles below:
http://www.creationtoday.org/how-could-light-travel-millions-of-years/
http://www.creationtoday.org/other-starlight-issues/
Shtal.
by Hundmutter on 23 September 2012 - 13:09
Your comments as usual lack any logic; the 'light years' thing, for instance only works your way
if one accepts the biblical assertion that the universe is only 6000 years old. I don't.
if one accepts the biblical assertion that the universe is only 6000 years old. I don't.
by Shtal on 23 September 2012 - 15:09
Hundmutter wrote: Your comments as usual lack any logic;
lol, And the moon is made of the green cheese that is my theory but I will say it is a fact!
Shtal.
lol, And the moon is made of the green cheese that is my theory but I will say it is a fact!
Shtal.
by Hundmutter on 23 September 2012 - 17:09
Do you also have faith in fairies at the bottom of your garden ?
by Hundmutter on 24 September 2012 - 11:09
??? {wot, no answer ?}
by Hundmutter on 24 September 2012 - 11:09
Shtal, that was a serious question. I would honestly like to know why you give credit to and think
we should all believe in and worship one supernatural being with mystical powers ...
but presumably do not feel the same about the existence of similar supernatural beings with
mystical powers.
we should all believe in and worship one supernatural being with mystical powers ...
but presumably do not feel the same about the existence of similar supernatural beings with
mystical powers.
by Shtal on 24 September 2012 - 15:09
Well, you have a free will to believe whatever you want, if you feel that you evolved from a rock 4.6 billions years ago and the rock is your great, great, great, great great, great, great, great, grandfather...That would be fine to; but if you don't want to take that chance just in case if you are wrong then believe in Jesus Christ so you could be saved from death.
Shtal.
Shtal.
by Two Moons on 24 September 2012 - 15:09
Shital,
You take a political thread and within three posts turn it into evolution once more ?
Are you that needy?
You take a political thread and within three posts turn it into evolution once more ?
Are you that needy?
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top