Romney's latest goof up - Page 2

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

vonissk

by vonissk on 18 September 2012 - 14:09

Let's see ladies, that's the poor he doesn't care about, 47% of the voters he doesn't care about and he talked off the wall about the Latinos in his private fund raising place..........hmmmm I'd say he's going to run out of things to try to "fix" pretty soon. The Europeans are against him........but yet there are going to be idiots that are going to try to get him in just to get rid of Obama. NOT what's best for the country, mind you, because he's damn sure not for that. Just to get Obama out. Unfortunately I don't see it happening either. Last night I stayed up late and was watching Rachel Maddow on MSNBC and according to their polls, etc etc, Mitty Baby hasn't a chance in hell to win. Not that I will take that for fact but I am sure hoping so. The more that comes out about him, the more I know this country doesn't need him. And what about the smirks and that stupid smile of his when the Lybian deal came down the other day? I don't care if he is a big rich businessman, I think he is a sick individual............

BTW Good Morning Joan, Blitzen and MtnDawg. Have a good day.............


by Seppi on 18 September 2012 - 14:09

Will see

by Seppi on 18 September 2012 - 14:09

First mistake is watching MSNBC.

by SitasMom on 18 September 2012 - 14:09



Romney was talking about stragity for getting votes......
47% are in the tank for Obama (they want more from the governemnt).........

I personally believe he had the balls to be a great president.


Obama talks about "sharing the wealth" or "spredding the wealth" .........to any of you really understand what he's saying?

by mtndawg on 18 September 2012 - 14:09

No Romney was talking about how 47% of the country are worthless, entitled trash.  That isn't a good "stragity".  




GSDNewbie

by GSDNewbie on 18 September 2012 - 14:09

I do not understand how anyone thinks Obama will keep promises a second term in office after not keeping them in the first. I do not care who gets the presidency as long as it is not him. If you think he is not about making money for himself and his friends by using his office, then you did not pay attention to the acts he committed while in office. The first time around he promised everything to the ghettos while talking bad about them behind their backs and this time he is using the geriatric squad to vote for him. He got smarter in that plan and I commend his move :) I will await the results of his "promises" to the medicare ridden and desperate and see if they get the same shaft the poor got for supporting him in his first election. I go by results and actions by the candidate when they are running for a second term and he has shown me that I do not want to keep him. There are many things I do not like about Romney either and he probably is not so much a better person, but I do know he has not been given a chance to prove himself and I find Obama sorely lacking as a leader for our country. I say no to another term for someone who has proven what he is and what he does is not what he promised and who has benefitted from his presidency while the nations people struggle to feed their families. If Romney proves to be as bad or worse I would say the same of him as well. Track records do not change and Obamas in the wrong lane as far as I am concerned. None of them are sweet and innocent or they would not have gotten to where they are. Neither of them are honest about what they say about the other either. I am not army of Romney, but rather anti Obama. I have serious doubts about Romney in office but I KNOW I hate Obama in office and the job he has done. 

by Seppi on 18 September 2012 - 14:09

Obama is keeping that 47% from finding a job because he has no idea how to solve the economy. I know I'm not better of today then 4 years ago. I would rather have a man that knows how to correct the economy then having a bullshit artist in charge.

by joanro on 18 September 2012 - 14:09

Sitasmom, how would Romney know what the 47 percent he's denouncing want? He is so out of touch and unconcerned with ANYONE who isn't wealthy and in his pocket that he is ineffectual as a candidate, and would be the worst thing to happen to this country in roll of pres.

Keith Grossman

by Keith Grossman on 18 September 2012 - 15:09

"I am not army of Romney, but rather anti Obama. I have serious doubts about Romney in office but I KNOW I hate Obama in office and the job he has done."

That's because people like you believe whatever Fox news feeds you.  Obama actually has done many of the things he said he would and is commonly credited for not having done things that he never said he would.  The POTUS has a limited amount of power; perhaps you should learn how government works and look to place the blame where it belongs...on a Republican congress who thinks making Obama a one term president is more important than doing their job and whats best for the country.

by mtndawg on 18 September 2012 - 15:09

Seppi... What do you think that Obama should have done differently?  It's not like he can get much through with the right blocking his every move in an effort to make him look bad and lose reelection.  You call him a bullshit artist, can you honestly say that Romney is not a professional bullshit artist?  Not to lay blame on the Bush administration, but this country was in a terrible place economically when Obama took over. Where do you think we would be without the bailouts?  I think Obama has done a pretty good job with the hand he was dealt.

 





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top