True meaning of Gun Control ? - Page 16

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

BabyEagle4U

by BabyEagle4U on 09 January 2013 - 20:01


by Preston on 09 January 2013 - 20:01

America never had any valid reason to wage war against Iraq or Afghanistan.  The Taliban nearly eradicated opium
production in Afghanistan.  Yes they are radicals but so are the criminals that run our military drone program.
All these Mideast wars are proven to be illegal, unprovoked, undeclared, and unConstitutional.  No one can
give any valid reason America is fighting them.  Nazis were hung at Nuremberg for this type of behavior. 
We have no legal right to be there and our leaders responsible are Int'l war criminals and mass murderers like
the Nazis.  Besides they did 911 as most are now realizing.

America is in Afghanistan ONLY for the opium, that's right to traffick in drugs.  Geraldo Rivera discovered this and
did his best to get the truth out. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXTZKlnL0U0

by zdog on 09 January 2013 - 21:01

 

 


Gun control will help because it is entirely logical and necessary.  No one writing the Constitution or the Bill of Rights could have imagined the power and destructiveness in what is available as personal firepower, as it exists today. They could not imagine that it would be used and turned against their own children sitting in a classroom in their town.

 

I'm sure people used guns against other people "back in the day" as well.  They didn't have to imagine, they lived it too.  People haven't changed a whole lot.  They also were aware of advances of their time and from earlier times, just as we're aware things will be different 100 year from now too.  They also witness and imagined the power and destructiveness a gov't or invading power could have over a populace with no means to defend themselves.  That is the reason it is part of the bill of rights.  They knew exactly what they were doing.  


Felloffher

by Felloffher on 09 January 2013 - 21:01

The Taliban are a bunch of thugs. They want control and power. What do you think they want? 

Sounds a lot like the US regime doesn't it? 150,000 dead civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan all under false pretense. Would it be justifiable if other nations decided to occupy  the US for being a bunch of thugs? Would you feel the same way if it was 150,000 American's being murdered? 

 

BabyEagle4U

by BabyEagle4U on 09 January 2013 - 21:01

Ahhh that's 1.5 million dead not 150,000.  What Smile About 35,000 US soldier, alliance and contractors.

by beetree on 09 January 2013 - 22:01

LOL, don't even. I just have to recall an image of a sky blue burqua and the woman who was stoned to death, wearing it.

Felloffher

by Felloffher on 09 January 2013 - 22:01

BE,

 Where did you get your stats? All I can find from numerous sources are estimates between 150,000 - 160,000 dead and 870,000 injured.

Felloffher

by Felloffher on 09 January 2013 - 22:01

LOL, don't even. I just have to recall an image of a sky blue burqua and the woman who was stoned to death, wearing it.

Why is it funny? There was a time when men in white hoods hung black men from trees, would this have been justification for an occupation of the US based on moral superiority?

BabyEagle4U

by BabyEagle4U on 09 January 2013 - 23:01

You have to do the math yourself Felloffher then get it varified by FOIA. Go year by year - gunshot wounds, impact of a car bombs, aerial bombardments, result of accidents/friendly fire and other blast/ordnances.

Go to the Post Invasion website pull the years - then go to the UN Population Division and pull the numbers - THEN construct your letter of conclusion and send for a confirmation request via Freedom Of Information Act. Any one website will not have the totals - they publish year by year in hopes the reader doesn't add them all up. Roll eyes

by beetree on 09 January 2013 - 23:01

That LOL was a smirk. So sorry. 

This has been hashed and rehashed. Let's do this simple. Yes, we never found WMD. That doesn't mean they never existed, it means we never found them. And, really, I do agee, we wouldn't have invaded I am sure, if a couple of airplanes hadn't found their way barreling into the World Trade Center Buildings. Of course, you will just deny that happened too. I certainly know mistakes were made. 

So, since you guys have all the answers, what exactly would you do now to fix this problem, as you see it? Please be detailed, I am very curious, I want to see if my suspicions on your answers to fix the world are even close.





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top