Ex-LAPD rampage... - Page 15

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by beetree on 09 February 2013 - 13:02

KTF

So, let us suppose there is something "Rotten in Denmark".  Does this make the alleged, wronged killer deserving of hero status for his choices? Seems a very odd way of choosing hero's, if that is where all the sympathy lies. Certainly not my ideal.



GSD Admin (admin)

by GSD Admin on 09 February 2013 - 14:02

Poor Dorner so misunderstood. lol. I am sure there is a conspiracy here someplace if we all concentrate and try hard enough we can probably come up with something. Maybe it is mind kontrol? Maybe it is secret Nazi's? Maybe it is gun control? Maybe a false flag attack.  LMAO.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2013/02/dorner-had-history-of-complaints-against-fellow-lapd-officers.html

BabyEagle4U

by BabyEagle4U on 09 February 2013 - 15:02

The police chief he mentioned in his manifesto retired in 2002. Dorner joined the police in 2002. He didn't know the police chief very well, if at all, hardly long enough to develop a grudge as police chief. But if you read further down the manifesto ..

That police chief (Captain's rank) became the lawyer and represented Dohner at his disciplinary hearing in which he was fired. He blamed him for not suppressing and/or introducing evidence that would have proven Dohner correct. I think that's where his original grudge is with the police chief.


BabyEagle4U

by BabyEagle4U on 09 February 2013 - 17:02

This guy is somewhere where he can monitor the internets and cable TV !! He's not on that mountain !!

From his manifesto:

The attacks will stop when the department states the truth about my innocence, PUBLICLY!!! I will not accept any type of currency/goods in exchange for the attacks to stop, nor do i want it. I want my name back, period. There is no negotiation. I am not the state department who states they do not negotiate with terrorist, because anybody with a Secret or TS/SCI has seen IIR's on SIPR and knows that the US state department always negotiates by using CF countries or independent sovereign/neutral country to mediate and compromising.


BabyEagle4U

by BabyEagle4U on 09 February 2013 - 17:02

From his manifesto:

I am here to change and make policy. The culture of LAPD versus the community and honest/good officers needs to and will change. I am here to correct and calibrate your morale compasses to true north.


Omg Smile

BabyEagle4U

by BabyEagle4U on 09 February 2013 - 17:02

This guy is on the move !!! LAPD isn't his only  target !!! 

From his manifesto:

Those of  you who "go along to get along" have no backbone and destroy the foundation of courage. You are the enablers of those who are guilty of misconduct. You are just as guilty as those who break the code of ethics and oath you swore.

I will utilize OSINT to discover your residences, spouses workplaces, and children's schools. IMINT to coordinate and plan attacks on your fixed locations. Its amazing whats on NIPR. HUMINT will be utilized to collect personal schedules of targets. I never had the opportunity to have a family of my own, I'm terminating yours.



BabyEagle4U

by BabyEagle4U on 09 February 2013 - 17:02

From his manifesto:

Whatever pre-planned responses you have established for a scenario like me, shelve it. Whatever contingency plan you have, shelve it. Whatever tertiary plan you've created, shelve it. I am a walking exigent circumstance with no OFF or reset button. JRIC, DOJ, LASD, FBI and other local LE can’t assist and should not involve themselves in a matter that does not concern them. For all other agencies, do not involve yourself in this capture or recovery of me. Look at the big picture of the situation. They (LAPD) created the situation. I will harm no outside agency unless it is a deadly force/IDOL situation. With today's budgeting and fiscal mess, you guys can not afford lose several officers to IOD or KIA/EOW. Plus, other officers should not have to take on the additional duties and responsibilities of dead officers. Think about their families, outside agencies, Chiefs/Directors.

Outside agencies and individual officers on patrol. If you recognize my vehicle, and confirm it is my vehicle thru a dmv/want warrant check. It behoves you to respond to dispatch that your query was for information purposes only. If you proceed with a traffic stop or attempt to notify other officers of my location or for backup you will not live to see the medal of valor you were hoping to receive for your actions. Think before you attempt to intervene. You will not survive. Your family will receive that medal of valor posthumously. It will gather dust on the fireplace mantel for years. Then one day, it will go in a shoe box with other memories. Your mother will lose a son or daughter. Your significant other will be left alone, but they will find someone else to fill your void in the future and make them just as happy. Your children, if you have them, will call someone else mommy or daddy. Don't be selfish. Your vest is only a level II or IIIA, think about it.
 

Confused Smile



BabyEagle4U

by BabyEagle4U on 09 February 2013 - 17:02

From his manifesto:

No amount of IMINT, MASINT, and ELINT assist you in capturing me. I am off the grid. You better use your feet, tongue and every available DOD/ NON-DOD HUMINT agency, contractor to find me. I know your route to and from home, and your division. I know your significant others routine, your children's best friends and recess. I know Your Sancha's gym hours and routine. I assure you that the casualty rate will be high. Because of that, no one will remember your name. You will merely be a DR# and "that guy" who was KIA/EOW or long term IOD/light duty in the kit room. This is exactly why "station 500" was created. Unfortunately, orphanages will be making a comeback in the 21st century.
 

Confused Smile


BabyEagle4U

by BabyEagle4U on 09 February 2013 - 17:02

I'm having a hard time believing he actually wrote 1/2 the stuff past line 132 and line 134 starts a whole new writing style mentality.






 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top