Geocentrism and - Page 12

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Carlin

by Carlin on 19 April 2014 - 20:04

I got it the first time around. I'm good with the unicorns.


GSDtravels

by GSDtravels on 19 April 2014 - 20:04

Exactly beetree, you don't want a conversation.  Funny how you never quite address what's said, you ridicule and dance around it like you're just so above it.  Funny stuff indeed.


by beetree on 19 April 2014 - 21:04

Wrong again. You won't ante up and I am not your average dumbass patsy to YOUR game. 

Answer the back questions, and catch up. Otherwise enjoy your affirmations with your cohorts. Boring, boring, boring.

Do tell, what is it that was so revolutionary in thinking that would bring Shtal screaming to his knees? Start with that one..

 

I am thinking it was just an excuse for something, and I won't embarrass you further. Simply because I have no need or desire to do that.

You can't talk without defining every other word. That is your limitation, not mine. I already told you... BORING.BORING. BORING.

 


by beetree on 19 April 2014 - 22:04

Tap, tap, tap. Funny how you never come back with substance. I haven't ridiculed, where is that? I am sick of your lies. You might want to start backing up some of those.


by beetree on 19 April 2014 - 22:04

Degree?  >>>>>>>>>>>> Who knows, only the shadow knows for sure! School of hard knocks, isn't it. Why so reluctant to admit it? Be proud, and strong! It makes you what you are today. Some will find your story inspirational, I am sure.

 

Shtal, surely, you must remember when you were threatened to be on your knees? Begging Travels to release you from her LOGIC to end all Gods!

I knew it. You won't start with your promises to explain!  Must be a HUGE relief to you to lie and sidestep. And I won't be playing until. Quid Pro Quo ? That one is still fresh in my memory! Sheep  Need a nudge?  CLARICE????

 


by beetree on 19 April 2014 - 22:04

FInd ONE DECEPTION from me, prove it. POST IT,

Or, STFU


Shtal

by Shtal on 19 April 2014 - 23:04

Beetree, I try not to think about the past lol

Shtal

by Shtal on 20 April 2014 - 23:04

GSD_Admin wrote: I know more faith, right? You folks sure have a lot of faith in illogical things but some of you want to talk logic like you own it, but then revert to illogical thoughts when trying to explain things that don't add up.

 

Of course you know your faith Admin, right? You sure have a lot of faith in illogical things by your definition. Could God use evolution to create the universe? But of course that depends on what you mean by “God.” Muslims believe in God, they certainly have different God than I do. Mormons believe in God, when they say heavenly father, they are praying to Adam, so what do you mean by God? Or in other thread you said you believe in God.

 

The “god” that would use the process like evolution would be cruel, wasteful and retarded/deceitful; it is NOT the God of the Bible, that’s for sure. It is not in the character of the God to use evil mean process like evolution, were bazillions animals have to die in order for things to improve, God is merciful; evolution is cruel - it’s NOT merciful, and the weakest is destroyed in evolution, NOT protected.

 

Jacque Monod said: “Natural selection is the blindest and most cruel way of evolving new species, and more complex organisms. The struggle for life and elimination of the weakest is a horrible process, against which our whole modern ethics revolts. An ideal society is a non-selective, where the weak is protected; which is exactly the reverse of the so-called natural law. Jacque said: I am surprised that a Christian would defend the idea that this is the process which God setup to have evolution.”

 

I am surprise too that anybody would say God used evolution, what kind God do GSDAdmin have anyway? His mean, that’s for sure.

 

Philosopher David Hull said: “Whatever the God implied by evolutionary theory and the data of natural history may be, he is not the Protestant God of waste not, want not. He is not even the awful God portrayed in the book of Job. The God of Galapagos is careless, he is wasteful, his indifferent, and he is almost diabolical.

 

This is NOT the God of the Bible that I would have to agree… “He is also not a loving God who cares about his productions”.

 

Charles Darwin in his Book said: “thus from the war of nature, from famine and death, the most exalted object was capable of conceiving the production of higher animals follows.”

 

See in evolution billions of things have to die in order to make a process work, one animal evolves little better than the rest, and the rest of them have to die or the new improved genes are swamp back into the gene code, they are lost.

 

But there are people like GSDAdmin who accept theistic evolution. The Bible says God’s ways are perfect; he made it right the first time so I do NOT believe God would you use evolution to get us here. For several reasons; I think GSDAdmin is talking about different God; this is NOT the character God of the Bible. The God of the Bible does NOT do things that way; Bible says he made everything by his word and it was perfect, and made all in six days, the Bible is real clear he rested the seventh day. And he finished his work from the foundation of the world, so the Bible clearly teaches six days of creation and rested the seventh day. And the Bible says very clearly man brought death into the world if GSDAdmin God is true then death brought man into the world or death was here before man arrived and the Bible says clearly man brought death into the world. And the Bible says remain in God’s image, so if original created man was some kind of animal you know that slowly evolved, then what is God look like? Is he baboon? And fourth thing to consider GSDAdmin, I think it is retarded God can’t make right first time and he is NOT worthy of worship - that’s for sure…And certainly number four, nullifies the need of death of Christ and fifth the most importantly there is no evidence for evolution anyway, so why should you take perfectly good Bible which was never been proven wrong and compromise with stupid theory that was never been proven right.

 

Everything that is about evolution is backwards to the Bible, every single thing, nothing matches.

 

Bible says: (Plants before Sun) vs. (Evolution says Sun before plants)

Bible says: (Marine mammals before land mammals) vs. (Evolution says Land mammals before marine mammals)

Bible says: (Birds before reptiles) vs. (Evolution says Reptiles before birds)

Bible says: Atmosphere between two layers of water) vs. (Evolution says Atmosphere above water)

Bible says: (Man brought death into the world) vs. (Evolution says Death brought man into the world)

Bible says: (God created man) vs. (Evolution says Man created God)

 

Does evolution matches Bible? Absolutely NOT, it is a heresy to teach God used evolution and a heresy is something is against clear teaching of scripture. And I think there are people who are heretics today like GSDAdmin.


by vk4gsd on 21 April 2014 - 03:04

Shtal normal people don't consider quoting people that agree with you evidence.


nature does not care if you don't like how it works in fact nature does not have an opinion in a secular world view.... it just is, too bad if it contradicts yr bible....just means bible is wrong.

if you want actual evidence of bible god there should be a pile of dead babies god killed when he drowned the world. get serious shtal get some evidence not more quotes.

piles of dead babies under a few feet of silt somewhere

Shtal

by Shtal on 21 April 2014 - 05:04

VK4 wrote: just means bible is wrong.

 

To Be Honest I think I am sticking with what Carlin said, your opinion of my faith VK4 is fairly close in significance to something my dog s*** in the yard this morning.






 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top