This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Two Moons on 09 January 2013 - 18:01
So is the killing of innocent children by our government with drone strikes claiming to be fighting terrorists.
Who do you suppose created and trained these terrorists?
Who do you suppose created and trained these terrorists?
by Blitzen on 09 January 2013 - 18:01
The ban to prevent all of what? Are you talking about the assault weapons ban? Couldn't you just have said that? Now that you've mentioned it, do you think that assault weapons should be available to anyone who would qualify for let's say a pistol? No additional background checks or a longer waiting period? I expect you must know a number of owners of assault weapons or those who desire one, so could you PLEASE tell me what they will or do use them for? No YouTubes please.
by Blitzen on 09 January 2013 - 18:01
Show me real proof that is happening, Moons. So far all I have seen is rhetoric from bloggers, and yes, youtubes.
by Ninja181 on 09 January 2013 - 18:01
Show me real proof that is happening,
Get off your lazy ass and look it up. I'm not here to serve you.
Eric Holder has admitted it. Please wake up.
Get off your lazy ass and look it up. I'm not here to serve you.
Eric Holder has admitted it. Please wake up.
by Blitzen on 09 January 2013 - 18:01
Excuse me? Get off my lazy ass and look it up. Maybe you should verify the crap you post on here before you post it?
http://openchannel.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/09/19/13966068-investigation-finds-no-evidence-ag-eric-holder-knew-of-fast-and-furious-gun-running-sting?lite
http://openchannel.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/09/19/13966068-investigation-finds-no-evidence-ag-eric-holder-knew-of-fast-and-furious-gun-running-sting?lite
by Two Moons on 09 January 2013 - 18:01
The ATF and individual states all have laws in place, and the main concern has always been concealed weapons not long guns.
Yes, I would say anyone who qualifies should be able to own whatever they like within the existing laws.
They can use them for any lawful activity, but the most important use might very well be fighting tyranny, that's what the Second amendment is all about in the first place.
It has nothing to do with hunting or target practice, it's not a game.
Yes, I would say anyone who qualifies should be able to own whatever they like within the existing laws.
They can use them for any lawful activity, but the most important use might very well be fighting tyranny, that's what the Second amendment is all about in the first place.
It has nothing to do with hunting or target practice, it's not a game.
by Two Moons on 09 January 2013 - 18:01
Oh yeah, none of them knew anything about Iran Contra either.
by BabyEagle4U on 09 January 2013 - 19:01
by Blitzen on 09 January 2013 - 19:01
BTW what do drones even have to do with gun control?
by Two Moons on 09 January 2013 - 19:01
Thank you BabyEagle,
of course some will say this is not real fact either.
Ya can't fix the Nine.
of course some will say this is not real fact either.
Ya can't fix the Nine.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top