
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by rtdmmcintyre on 08 October 2014 - 02:10
Dr. Philip K. Russell, a virologist who oversaw Ebola research while heading the U.S. Army's Medical Research and Development Command, and who later led the government's massive stockpiling of smallpox vaccine after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, also said much was still to be learned. "Being dogmatic is, I think, ill-advised, because there are too many unknowns here."
Dr. Russel was just one of the contributors. So it isn't just some Dr.s. I never said you said never (lol) That statement I made just adding to Dr. Russel's statement about not being dogatic as well as that things with all viruses change as they go from person to person they mutate. With each mutation no one knows what it will do. There fore the never say never wasn't directed to you but rather to what some Dr.s or as you say potential quacks said. I think I am beginning to get you GSD. I think you would be fun to have around. I would enjoy spending an evening face to face with you. I would enjoy to debate almost anything with you.

by GSD Admin on 08 October 2014 - 05:10
Reggie,
I am actually a very funny, loving, intelligent, caring, humble and shy person. When people I work with need advice I am one of the first people they talk to. The last place I worked I thought about opening a counseling office because I had so many of my co-workers asking for advice, wanting to BS and debate issues. I can be hard especially when someone is hard at me. Treat me well and you get back what you give. Treat me bad and you get back bad.
When I show people what I put up with here they shake their head and ask me what I get paid, I LOL and tell them nothing I do it because I was asked to by a nice man named Oli. I generally don't take this place to heart as I know this is the internet and people are people. BUT, I give what I get and I don't need to take shit. I will for so long and then that is it.
The owner does not want this forum over run with conservative non-sense. Hence, my stand against most things conservative. In Iceland, it is very liberal and even the most conservative politicians are like our liberals.

by GSD Lineage on 08 October 2014 - 08:10
Ebola could now spread to dogs? Could a canine vaccine be the key?
http://www.aol.com/article/2014/10/08/ebolas-victims-may-include-dog-in-spain/20974372/?icid=maing-grid7%7Cmain5%7Cdl2%7Csec1_lnk2%26pLid%3D542165
Ebola's victims may include a dog named Excalibur. Officials in Madrid got a court order to euthanize the pet of a Spanish nursing assistant with Ebola because of the chance the animal might spread the disease.
This is what the Harvard people needed ... people who could pay for a vaccine! Pet owners!

by Mountain Lion on 08 October 2014 - 13:10

by Mountain Lion on 08 October 2014 - 15:10
Texas Ebola patient dead.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/ebola-crisis-leaves-dallas-a-city-on-edge/ar-BB8aB3r

by yellowrose of Texas on 08 October 2014 - 15:10
I knew when Rick Perry could not and would not say on late tv last night when ask what is the condition of the Dallas man, that he was most likely not gonna make it or already had passed,]
THE government is trying hard to shadow all this
YR

by Hundmutter on 08 October 2014 - 19:10
Reuters does have it now. TOD 10 to 8 am Wednesday. RIP Mr Duncan.
by joanro on 08 October 2014 - 19:10

by Mountain Lion on 08 October 2014 - 22:10
Here we go!
A Dallas County Sheriff's Deputy who had contact with the vicitim now in hospital with Ebola symptoms:
http://dfw.cbslocal.com/?lead=frisco-patient-exhibiting-ebola-symptoms

by GSD Admin on 09 October 2014 - 05:10
False alarm?
Here is some information for you guys about Ebola, its chances of mutating and its airborne potential. How it would probably already be spread around the world if airborne.
http://theconversation.com/should-we-be-worried-about-ebola-becoming-airborne-32502
Suggestions the Ebola virus could “mutate” into a form that is transmissible by the respiratory route are speculative, and the likelihood of it happening are low. Nonetheless, the idea appears to have captured public attention to the extent that the World Health Organization recently made public statements about there being no threat the virus was airborne.
The current Ebola virus outbreak shows a similar pattern of spread and disease as past such outbreaks, but its emergence in previously unaffected cities and countries has increased mortality and media interest.
Like most emerging human viruses, Ebola is of animal origin: in this case, fruit bats. The method of human-human spread of this virus is clear; it’s via contaminated body fluids, be it blood, vomit, faeces or urine. The viral load in these fluids is enormous.
Ebola is not spread through respiratory transmission, which happens when people can be infected through inhalation or direct contact with the eyes, nose, or mouth from virus present in large droplets or smaller airborne particles.
Small airborne particles are the most efficient method for community and hospital spread of any infection, as demonstrated by outbreaks of measles, varicella (chickenpox), or even the now-eradicated smallpox.
Larger droplets from coughing or sneezing is the main method for spread of influenza and related viruses. For a virus to spread like this, a patient with respiratory symptoms generally has to be within one or two metres of the uninfected person.
Transmission of respiratory viruses can also occur by direct contact with the nose, mouth or eyes from contaminated hands or surfaces. If respiratory transmission became the dominant mode of community spread of Ebola, presumably following mutations in the Ebola genome, it would “up the ante” in terms of risk the virus poses.
Like many RNA viruses, the Ebola genome changes quickly. But there’s no evidence of respiratory transmission in the current or previous Ebola community outbreaks, and the genetic variability of the virus is as expected.
The “slowness” of spread in the current Ebola outbreak is against respiratory transmission being a major factor: the 2009 pandemic influenza virus, spread by respiratory droplets, had become worldwide in a comparable timeframe.
The reasons why this epidemic is continuing are multiple. Ebola outbreaks have not occurred before in this part of Africa, meaning there’s limited local medical, public health and laboratory experience in managing the disease.
The early stages of infection are similar to the other common local endemic diseases, such as malaria, diarrhoea and influenza. Inadequate hospital and public health infrastructure increases these clinical difficulties.
This is exacerbated by cases appearing in highly populated urban areas, local cultural practices, such as handling of the dead before burial, and patient care outside the medical system, regional insecurity and suspicion of outsiders.
These factors make it difficult to remove infected cases from situations that allow transmission to others, and to provide the best advice to the community on infection control measures.
And poverty is clearly the main amplifier of the Ebola virus' spread.
Although difficult to prove, aerosols generated by medical procedures may contribute to health-care worker infection in the context of poor use of personnel protective equipment. But once established in humans, viruses do not generally change their mode of transmission even though they may change in virulence.
This doesn’t alter the importance of infection-control measures needed to control the outbreak, especially in the health-care setting. Appropriate mask and personal protective equipment use, with training of health-care personnel, is a crucial part of these procedures.
There are no antiviral agents for the Ebola virus, although virus-specific antibody preparations and new drugs have been proposed and are in trial. Vaccine development has progressed although the interest by the profit-driven industry has been limited.
But there are reasons for delays in vaccine development apart from the likely low financial return. The remoteness of the problem, the rarity of the disease, and technical issues in working with the live virus have also contributed.
In the short term, what’s needed most to combat the epidemic is provision of quality infection control practices, and research to fast-track antiviral drugs and vaccines. In the longer term, repair or creation of satisfactory health-care systems (in the context of the alleviation of poverty) in the developing world will minimise the impact of such outbreaks.
Opinions freely given in the general media without supporting evidence risk diversion from the core requirements for controlling this outbreak. These requirements centre on immediate and significant medical, technical and supportive assistance to the affected countries, including clear infection control advice for their health-care systems and general population
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top