
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by bartolo on 31 August 2007 - 23:08
Somebody konws how can I see the male bitework list?. Thank you.
by j-lo on 01 September 2007 - 06:09

by Petros on 01 September 2007 - 07:09
In the results' page there are some entries that are not filled in.
What does this mean?
The dog did not participate or something else is going on?
Thanks in advance
by Spinerau on 01 September 2007 - 10:09
I think not participate.
What happen with Zamp Thermodos, seems he doesn´t participate, Winner Assaut failed, same Zidan Grabfeldgau,
But Naxos, Negus, Digger good.
Tiras Roten Feld OK, Wilson Schnuckenweide OK,
Holtkamper Hof team everybody OK, Ilbo, Idol, Odín OK
Pakros OK, Dux 4 Flores OK, Vegas OK, Greif von der Karl May-Hole OK
first place by his persistence in BSZS participation Orbit Huhnegrab, but there are 30 better producers than him, he doesn´t deserve the Sieger first place, NO WAY at all, verym, very better producers, Pakros, specially females, Dux in males wooow!! Idol both Femalkes and males, Idol for me is the best producer, We miss this time Janos, but his son Jumbo was OK in bitework, for me he will be in the first 20
Kalli, I hope continue Erasmus line.
Jasmin, very good, Pania very good, my favorites.
Strong bones from Zamp sons and daughters are not commun, Pania has it
Males from Zamp Strong boned........... please let me know which males do you think are very strong boned from Zamp in this Siegerschau
More in a few hours.
by pastoralemao on 01 September 2007 - 10:09
winner did not participate

by Dawn G. Bonome on 01 September 2007 - 12:09
Does anyone know why Winner Assaut did not participate? Was he there at all, and then pulled at the last minute?
Dawn
by flanders1 on 01 September 2007 - 16:09
Teejay von Wilhendorf is listed as "nicht genugend". Translated using one of the internet dictionaries as "not forceful enough". Does this mean failed because of weak bitework?
by Louise M. Penery on 02 September 2007 - 01:09
"nicht genugend" means insufficient (not sufficient)--the polar opposite of TSB pronounced.
Usually, NG implies that the dog did not engage the helper initially or that he failed to re-engage after slipping off (due to a poor grip) or bouncing off the sleeve (due to a poor catch or targeting).
A dog may receive a rating of TSB "present" (not pronounced--but, still, better than NG--due to a weak grip or lack of confidence on the guarding) even if he outs on command and performs the free heeling exercise without fault.
He may also fail by refusing to out and still receive a TSB pronounced rating.
If the dog fails the free heeling after 3 attempts, the perfomance test is terminated without an actual evaluation of the bitework--the dog is out of control.
by flanders1 on 02 September 2007 - 02:09
thanks for the clarification.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top