breeders - Page 2

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by trexshep on 29 January 2007 - 21:01

In keeping with brief posts. I will quote from Random House's dictionary for more generalized definitions. Partnership -the state or condition of being a partner, participation, association, joint interest Black's Law Dictionary is more specific and even goes so far as quote the Law in most states. Partnership-"a business owned by two or more persons that is not organized as a corporation." and "As an association of two or more persons to carry on, AS CO-OWNERS, a business for profit." They quote the Uniform Partnership Act, Statute 6 (1). I guess, Tina5's interpretation was right and you were wrong. I also think Tina5 tried to point out that TREXSHEP wrote the post, not someone named Frank Tate. Thats twice you have admittedly publicly posted hearsay of a L i b e l o u s nature and I thought that wasnt allowed.

by trexshep on 29 January 2007 - 21:01

Hearsay - "Evidence not proceeding from the personal knowledge of the witness, but from the mere repetition of what he has hear others say.... The very nature of the evidence shows its weakness, and, as such, hearsay evidence is generally inadmissable..." now for the benefit an you and some others I've seen use bullying type tactics on this medium, I suggest you get a copy of Fighting Slander for Business Third Edition. You see, if any person owns a corporation and you Libel or slander the way they do business you could find your self involved in a major suit. Considering some of the things I have seen written here regarding some of the breeders I've mentioned in my earlier post there were many libelous things said. Judge for yourselves. Mr. Black generously describes LIBEL - A method of defamation expressed by print, writing, pictures or signs. In its most general sense, any publication that is injurious to the reputation of another. Accusation in writing or printing against the character of a person which affects his reputation, in that it intends to hold him up to ridicule. contempt, shame,disgrace,...to induce an evil opinion of him in the minds of right thinking persons to make him an object of reproach... or to deprive him of friendly intercourse in society. Almost any language which upon its face which has a natural tendency to injure a mans reputation, either generally or with regard to his occupation." Hmmm, God of War, I think your statements have crossed the line since your intent was obvious while your evidence self admittedly was nothing more than hearsay. Anyway this was for Tina5, I approach your comments regarding my post in a bit.

by Odin on 29 January 2007 - 22:01

Get a grip Trex, Odin is perhaps one of the most influential Studs of West German Show lines, seems as though you have a little too much time on your hands. As far as your little dissertation regarding libel please remember that we live in a FREE Democratic society and freedom of speech is protected in this country. If you or your friends don't like it tuff crapola, get over it or go ahead and sue me. I hear that if you play certain recordings backwards you can hear hidden messages, why don't you go take your meds and listen for those messages, perhaps you can report back with what you've found. Oh and by the way here's another law suit for you, I think your a total asshole, now you can file 2 law suits moron! :-)

by trexshep on 29 January 2007 - 23:01

Most of what I write about I get from show catalogs, web sites and first hand (not hearsay) knowledge from training and dog shows. I even go to Germany 2 or 3 times a year. Anyone on this bulletin board can go to Phoenixgsd.org and see what dogs Frank Tate has for themselves. As you said, but apparantly didn't mean was to let people judge for themselves what he owns and breeds. I responded to a post where a man asked about Long Island breeders, I named two. I answered his question without maligning any of the 6 breeders I mentioned there. I even suggested they speak to the owner of empire land the former partner of Phoenix. They traveled, were seen and showed dogs they co-owned at two sieger shows, according to the catalogs posted at the WDA website. I myself judge a breeder/owner by the quality of dogs they publicly show whether it be a by product of what they bought or what they bred. Who cares! They are the owner of record. To me there is nothing more pathetic to see a person whose dogs are always running at the back of a pack month after month, year after year. Worse, while writing on these lists they lay claim to having knowledge. Its not the opinion of a person or what his friends say about his dogs, its what the judges have to say. There is a big difference in a dog placing fourth in a class of 40 than in a class of 4. There is a big difference in a dog placing V 25 at the German sieger show than one placing V 75 or V 125 even if you and half of the List disagree with the judge and like the V 75 dog better. Judges offer expert opinion and are paid to give it. A layman's opinion from someone whose dogs never win is meaningless, worthless or both.

by trexshep on 30 January 2007 - 00:01

Get a grip Trex, Odin is perhaps one of the most influential Studs of West German Show lines, seems as though you have a little too much time on your hands. HMMM, THEN I'M RESPONDING TO A DEAD DOG THAT TYPES? As far as your little dissertation regarding libel please remember that we live in a FREE Democratic society and freedom of speech is protected in this country. HAHAHA SO DOES THE RIGHT FOR ME TO SWING AND WAVE MY ARMS ABOUT MY BODY, BUT IT ENDS IF ONE OF MY HANDS ACCIDENTLY HITS SOMEONE. YOUR UNDERSTANDING OF THE LAWS IN THE USA ARE UMMM SOMEWHAT OBSOLETE. If you or your friends don't like it tuff crapola, get over it or go ahead and sue me. GOSH, NOW THAT I SPOKE NICELY ABOUT A BUNCH OF WINNING BREEDERS THEY ARE SUDDENLY MY FRIENDS. WELL, A PERSON COULD DO A LOT WORSE. I hear that if you play certain recordings backwards you can hear hidden messages, why don't you go take your meds and listen for those messages, perhaps you can report back with what you've found. DATING YOURSELF A BIT NOW ARENT YOU? IS THAT THE ONE THAT SUPPOSEDLY SAID, "JOHN IS DEAD"? Oh and by the way here's another law suit for you, I think your a total asshole, now you can file 2 law suits moron! :-) YOUR THINKING PROCESSES ARE OBVIOUS TO ALL NOW AND YOUR LACK OF AN EXTENSIVE VOCABULARY BECOMES MORE APPARENT WITH EACH POST. DIDNT I READ SOMEWHERE WHEN A PERSON HAS TO REVERT TO VULGARITY ITS AN ADMISSION OF DEFEAT? WHY NOT TALK ABOUT DOGS SINCE HOPEFULLY ITS AT LEAST THE ONE COMMON GROUND WE CAN HOPEFULLY AGREE ON.

by Haus Simpkins on 30 January 2007 - 12:01

thise two would probably be fine but they both specialize in show line GSD's if that is was you want. I deal with a lot of old line Working lines if that is what you want shoot me an e-mail steve@haussimpkins.com





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top