
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by GSD Admin on 22 April 2013 - 03:04
I believe him to be a citizen with every right afforded under the law. Sad to see an officer not believe in his rights. Makes ya wonder.
I also see that the FBI, local police and politicians saying there is no imminent danger but an internet cop agreeing with the US atty. Doesn't shock me in the least bit.
I also see that the FBI, local police and politicians saying there is no imminent danger but an internet cop agreeing with the US atty. Doesn't shock me in the least bit.

by Slamdunc on 22 April 2013 - 03:04
I think the US atty will be prosecuting the case, who do you recommend we listen too? Ohh, my bad lets all take advice for the internet experts. LOL You do have extensive training and experience with Miranda, so I now defer to you.

by Hundmutter on 22 April 2013 - 03:04
Could be wrong but I'd guess this is a red herring, the guy probably
has at least a broad idea of what his rights amount to. US legal
practices as they relate to terrorism offenses, remembering the
suspect is first and foremost a human being , raise a lot of questions
internationally (yes, OK so do the UK's); let's hope that he does get a
fair trial, exploring all possibilities including the one he had nothing to
do with the bombing. Providing that happens (and one hopes is made
a matter of PUBLIC record in its entirety) this is beyond the matter of
whether he was Mirandized or not ...
I am sure if it became a technical issue at Trial the lawyers will sort it
out then (!), rather than it being argued one way or t'other on the 'Net
If he is shown to be guilty, given the above caveat, of course the USA
would be justified in throwing the book @ him - would that include the
death penalty in this case / area ? [ For once, that is something I would
find difficult to oppose, given the circumstances.]
has at least a broad idea of what his rights amount to. US legal
practices as they relate to terrorism offenses, remembering the
suspect is first and foremost a human being , raise a lot of questions
internationally (yes, OK so do the UK's); let's hope that he does get a
fair trial, exploring all possibilities including the one he had nothing to
do with the bombing. Providing that happens (and one hopes is made
a matter of PUBLIC record in its entirety) this is beyond the matter of
whether he was Mirandized or not ...
I am sure if it became a technical issue at Trial the lawyers will sort it
out then (!), rather than it being argued one way or t'other on the 'Net

If he is shown to be guilty, given the above caveat, of course the USA
would be justified in throwing the book @ him - would that include the
death penalty in this case / area ? [ For once, that is something I would
find difficult to oppose, given the circumstances.]

by Two Moons on 22 April 2013 - 03:04
Moons.

by GSD Admin on 22 April 2013 - 03:04
I still feel the guy deserves to be innocent until proven guilty by a jury or judge and not some internet cop.

by Slamdunc on 22 April 2013 - 03:04
LMAO!!!! Really???????

by GSD Admin on 22 April 2013 - 03:04
Yep, you of all people should support the justice system and its proper use under the law.

by Slamdunc on 22 April 2013 - 03:04
Ummm, I do and realize what the law is and not just state nonsense on forums. Never mind, you are way off.

by Two Moons on 22 April 2013 - 04:04
As far as I'm concerned it can all burn to the ground.

by GSD Lineage on 22 April 2013 - 04:04
He (Suspect 2) is writing, (Communicating this way now). He can't speak as he was shot (Possibly Self inflicted) from inner mouth to back of neck. (plus he has other injuries). The strange part is that they (Chechnya) are supposed to be enemies of Russia not the US. That is why Russia asked that the older brother be interrogated and looked into while the US granted them asylum when they applied for refugee status as Muslim Chechens. But the really confusing part is that at the older brother was born in Soviet Russia and neither one ever lived in Chechnya.
Will see how it plays out.
Will see how it plays out.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top