This is a placeholder text
Group text
by GSD Admin on 14 January 2013 - 01:01
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
What is not to agree with?
Should we allow missile launchers, nuclear warheads, chemical weapons? After all these are arms also. What about tanks and jets?
When I read the 2nd amendment where are these well regulated militias? Where is the line drawn? Are you folks good with the average person owning the above weapons? I mean after all we need to protect ourselves from a government who may take over. Communism is taking over our government.
The sky is falling. geez.Honestly, all these conspiracies and government takeovers sounds like a bunch of paranoid people who I would question whether or not are competent to even own guns.
by Two Moons on 14 January 2013 - 01:01
The right of the people, not some people, all Americans.
by BabyEagle4U on 14 January 2013 - 01:01
by Two Moons on 14 January 2013 - 01:01
by BabyEagle4U on 14 January 2013 - 01:01
Ohh well.
by GSD Admin on 14 January 2013 - 01:01
Where is this well regulated militia???
by Two Moons on 14 January 2013 - 01:01
Either way, you still don't understand what is at stake, it's not school kids.
Sad but true.
It's not Indians either.
by Two Moons on 14 January 2013 - 01:01
Your fellow Americans.
by GSD Admin on 14 January 2013 - 01:01
And yes name calling to support an arguement. Name calling of admins and the site owner. But it is okay cause it is just Moons and his time of the month. The sky is falling Moons. geez.
That is not regulated. OMG.
by Two Moons on 14 January 2013 - 01:01
I already told you my thoughts on Alex Jones.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top