Game Changer! - Page 18

Rotfl ^ I'll take a looksee.

Per hellery pic-- looks like she's forming ffffff. As in; "FFuk you sheeple ! Hahaha. I'm WINNING!!! "

Give me TJMaxx over someone trying to sell bigotry and hate any day of the week. The sad part is many republicans are buying the hate. Still waiting for one proposal that Trump has put forth. And nothing from the Trump supporters, crickets. Crickets also on how a Christian could support a pro-choice candidate. The death spiral of the republican party.

 

But the second thing I noticed this past week was even more significant in the story of the GOP’s unraveling.

Two columns in the National Review, a standard-bearer of elite conservative thought, took after the white working-class and impoverished supporters of Donald Trump, saying essentially that they were to blame for their own economic conditions.

“The truth about these dysfunctional, downscale communities is that they deserve to die. Economically, they are negative assets. Morally, they are indefensible,” wrote Kevin Williamson, a National Review correspondent, about places in remote upstate New York and eastern Kentucky.

So, does that mean you gave Hillary $5 dollars? Those must be the same crickets I heard when I asked what you did NOT like about Hillary!

Speaking of fashionista's... there is something of tradition going on here with Hillary's style choices! Did you know her father was in the Drapery business and made designs for them, too? Now it all makes sense! Those ... coat covering things she loves to wear, have a real sense of black-out curtain charm, and really, it carries quite a tradition with it, too!

  

This one should be good for St. Patricks Day...   .

 

The thing is I don't support Hillary at the moment. But I will support her over trump. And I will continue to say we are better off with a known quantity than an unknown bigot. Who changes his spots with the wind.

Let's just say that the known quality has shown they too, can "change their spots with the wind". So, you know that for certain and that is preferable to someone you claim is *"intolerant toward those holding different opinions". And in the next breath (or topic or post) you are castigating the entire populace of Christians, because in your view, if they aren't very good Christian's, you can't tolerate them calling themselves Christians. And probably, they deserve to be hated for not meeting your standards, because of course then they are even worse than someone who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions, because claiming Christrian beliefs can only mean someone must conform to the standard of Jesus, which we all know is perfection. Clearly an unobtainable goal, so "poof". Instant moral high ground. That is kind of laughable if it wasn't so, damn intolerant.

Wow. That takes a good deal of pretzel bending to get into that shape of mind!

*Dictionary definition

Also, I should ask, unknown, as in how? For someone who has such amazing stats for earned media, we can hardly call Trump an "unknown". More accurately, it is a non-establishment known that is making you uneasy because that makes a comfortable prediction accuracy, not in your favor. I'm sure that is a dependable "known".

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/16/upshot/measuring-donald-trumps-mammoth-advantage-in-free-media.html?_r=0

Looks like when Hillary needs a cash infusion, nothing beats fundraising in CT. 

Admission starts at $2,700 per person. There is also a $5,400 price tier that includes a photo with Clinton and a VIP reception option for those who bundle at least $10,000 in donations.

No stumping to the little people.

There are no public events or campaign rallies on Clinton’s schedule while she’s in Connecticut.

Clinton leads the entire presidential field in money raised in Connecticut, with a haul of more than $1.8 million. Most of that has been mined from Fairfield County, including the Gold Coast locales of Greenwich, Stamford and Westport.

Former State Democratic Chairwoman Nancy DiNardo said neither Clinton nor her supporters should take their foot off the gas.

“I would advise them not to make any assumptions about Connecticut,” DiNardo said. “Connecticut people want to hear from the candidates just like every other state.”

Truly, it is always a nice feeling to be appreciated for something. And I know the Clinton couple just can't help that people want to pay at least a quarter of a million dollars to hear them make a speech. So, really, this is a bargain basement pricing opportunity! One, that I'm afraid, I'm just going to have to take a pass on. 

http://www.ctpost.com/local/article/After-big-wins-Hillary-Clinton-coming-to-Conn-6892849.php

http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/05/politics/hillary-clinton-bill-clinton-paid-speeches/

Bee, you do realize that Trump is only loaning his campaign the money to operate and somewhere down the line he is going to ask for a reimbursement of those monies, right?

 

BTW, the beat goes on as we the Americans look like shit to the rest of the world. http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/16/world/china-donald-trump/index.html

Yes, I am fully aware of the astute business decision of Trump's loan to his own campaign. However, if you tally the separate candidate donations to date, which he isn't asking for but only accepting if offered, there is just no comparison.

He can cover the difference, clearly by his nonchalance in the matter. Not so with Hillary. She has no intentions of covering her campaign expenses with any personal ones. And it isn't like she can't spare her own $5 dollars, you know!

I'll have to read your link later for a comment. I got a nice St. Patty's day dinner with company planned, and it is time to vacuum up the dog hair!

Admin, your link validates what I've been saying about trump... He is no different than Hitler and all the rest of the world tyrants throughout history...with tthe exception that he already has his castle.