The support of Janice Bartmess--DDR-DSH :-)~ - Page 8

I know, right?  Some of us also copied some of her most outrageous quotes into PMs, so there's a record.  Guess she didn't bank on that, plus she actually missed a few choice remarks of hers when she erased them.  Pesky, pesky  little track record.......

Here's a really good thread! In this one, BARTMESS supports NONA! Together they try to pin cat abuse on sp.

http://www.pedigreedatabase.com/german_shepherd_dog/bulletins.read?mnr=421635

"It's a REALLY poor choice of words, coming from someone who claims to be so much against animal abuse. I hope to God that SP didn't really KILL a cat. It's just not the kind of thing you JOKE about, if you really like animals. It trivializes their mis-treatment. Dead cat jokes are nothing new, but they are offensive to cat lovers. "

That quote is from Janice.  She is really something else.  Talk about balls.

Whoa.  Nona I know you were upset with Sock Puppet, but can you not see that back then, when Janice Bartmess was in the midst of flooding this board with her AR threads, etc., to accuse Sock Puppet of being "ANOTHER ANIMAL ABUSER" was way out of line, and certainly gave Janice the feeling you supported her and gave her fuel for her fire?  It's really bad because regardless of whether or not you like Sock Puppet, he was the one working the hardest to get her off this board, as well as was assisting to find out if she was in the midst of currently abusing animals, and trying to put a stop to it.

Maybe it's really time to admit that maybe, just maybe,  Sock Puppet is not the monster you were led to believe?  Start again?

Red Sable that quote is bone chilling.  I have gone back and re-read some of her posts, but I keep stopping because they actually make me physically ill.

I cannot read those diatribes. I try, but usually my mind wanders off after about 3 sentences. It's hard to focus when you know it's all garbage and lies.

Sue, who do you think LED nona to her conclusions about Sock?

I could be wrong, but I honestly believe that when Nona began posting on this board she stepped into the middle of something she didn't fully understand, and unfortunately took the word of Maggie, who has now been shown (track record)  to be someone who has a penchant for  shit stirring, rewriting history to garner sympathy, as well as to position herself in a much better light, than that shown by the cold, hard truth.

What's your take on it, VM?

Red Sable understands that she was naive to think Bartmess had redeemed herself.  These serial animal collectors/abusers are like child molesters in that the vast majority of them simplay cannot be fixed, no matter what the prison shrink industry tries to tell us.  To Red Sable's credit, she realizes that  that now, and there is no need for further self-flagellation.

The troll and certain associates, on the other hand, could care less that Bartmess was caught again abusing animals with the added feature  of being caught this time with her poor mother lying incoherent in her own wastes.  That's why we are offered a revisionist history - or, in the case of the troll, no history at all in the form of serial post deletion and the insertion of her loathesome self as some kind of victim in all this.  

In the end there are at least two sociopaths involved here, with the only real difference between them the lack of a filter restraining the behavior of the one presently behind bars.    

Yes, I did say that Sock puppet killed the kitty.....That was copied from his own comment.....However, I did not do anything more wrong by coping that and twisting the meaning of that post than he did to me....If its wrong for one to do, than its wrong for all......

Way back when all this started between SP and I, I  think was over an ad that was posted and he accused me of being the one that submitted the comment abou that ad........He just assumed it was me because that  person the ad was about lives about 50 miles from me......He accused me of doing it because of competition.....Well little did SP know that woman he claims he spoke to and he claims she told him all kinds of things, happened to be a good friend of mine......She also said she never spoke to, or communicated with him in any way......That is when I lost respect for SP for accusing me and lying about it in the very beginning......That is what set the stage for our long standing, understanding of each other...

I have tried to ignore him even as recent as today...But as you can see he had the need to address me once again, when nothing I said pertained to him AT ALL...Why not leave me alone...Personally, I think he just like to try and get a rise out of me...That use to work, but it doesn't work anymore....

No Sue, I will not say anything I don't feel in my heart....Sorry, at least that how I feel at this time....