Game Changer! - Page 36

Thinking his information sources are as limited as you describe when it is a genius for classic rhetoric. Read the link for more detail.

I didn't understand....'Thinking his information sources are as limited as you describe when it is a genius for classic rhetoric. '

But listen to how many times he admits he gets his info from TV and he even said 'I only know what's on the internet!' TV and internet is his reference for information about anything not connected to his realestate.
He even tried to alibi his spoken misinformation on Time mag, saying he '..read it in the Time so blame them if I'm wrong.' Not very adult, forget presidential.

So, you have no problem with someone invading your space and grabbing you? I must say truthfully that I can't understand a woman who supports Trump. Time after time after time he has disparaged woman and you guys support him. I am thinking it goes to the way you have been treated by men growing up. After all there are woman who like to be chocked and have their hair pulled during sex. Woman who support Trump either have an esteem problem or like being treated poorly by rich powerful men. Trump brings zero to the table and most people admit that what he says will never be followed up on IF he should become president. But yet out the other side of their mouths they say he is anti-establishment. SMH.

@GSD There is a serious misunderstanding in how you are reading my posts concerning the unfolding drama of the current political primary situation as I, and perhaps others make new comments, each day. Can't really say I speak for anyone else, but myself.

I am attempting to look at what is happening with the Trump campaign with an open mind, ever since it started to become clear that he was knocking out the establishment Republican's, left and right. If you weren't trying to make my comments personally stick to me, IRL, so you can gain some kind of moral upper ground that would be a clear bell clanger, end of match, how can I not vote for Hillary, now(!) — moment, then you might detect objectivity in the presentation of my posts in what is happening with the Donald Trump campaign. I do admit that it might lead me to appear to present in the manner of "devil's advocate".

I have repeatedly said, I would never have thought he could get this far, I can't believe half of what comes out of his mouth, yet, none of this apparently matters! I think the latest link I posted re: his "truthful hyperbole" makes much of this disconnect, much clearer for me on what is driving his success. Here is the link again: http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2016/03/28/3762742/trump-rhetoric-2/ 

The area where I have stated I am not being objective is in the support of Hillary. If all things were predictable with the old guard status quo Republican's, at this point I would seek to support Kaisch. However, my pragmatic side just doesn't think he will persevere and get the delegates needed.

Did you read any of the links I provided today? Did you read how much Trump's children are respected with their level of eduction and personal ethics and business success in China? Does that sound like kids who grew up to witness their mother being dragged by the hair and choked as a matter of course by their father? No, it doesn't. I have heard plenty of sexist, stupid comments by otherwise decent men, and my choice then is to attempt an empathetic education as to how their remarks are hurtful, or if that fails, not be involved with their conversations in the future.

Read the rhetoric link! It uses excerpts from his 1987 book, The Art of the Deal. Puts lots of his wackier remarks into perspective. Is it good? Or bad? The point that is fascinating me, is that neither of those judgments seem to matter! Truly remarkable what is happening. (And I am not personally involved in one tiny bit of it!)

Bee, you are more or less saying that you will support him if your guy doesn't get in and for the life of me - I don't get it. I understand why a lot of people support him. I just can't for the life me understand why you would and yes if a liberal candidate was that bad I probably would cross the divide and vote for a candidate on the other side even if I really didn't care for them. Main reason would be to stop a monster/bad actor which in this case fits.

NO I AM NOT. I promised I would not TELL ANY ONE here, how I plan to vote. And that is my official stance, then and still, now.

I am purely enjoying the speculation and sometimes thoughtful debate and differing views as this unpredictable situation unfolds.

I actually understand your horror. I am pretty much powerless to do anything about it. I prefer to try and understand how we got here, that is about all that is left for me.

What amazes me is how many people believe that success in realestate equates to qualifying for potus....if that premise is true, then being a successful car salesman qualifies for potus.

But your arguments and statements aren't reflective of your intentions. And anyone reading this would think you are somewhat of a supporter. Whether that is mistaken or not it is how you have come across in all these pages. There is no doubt Trump would be bad for America and anyone who thinks differently is clearly not really playing with a full deck.

Well, I am a bit of an enigma, I suppose! I think it is mostly clear that I have conservative leanings. How that will translate on voting day, I just do not know. I have not made up my mind!

I am not even sure if Trump gets elected, how it will pan out, to tell you the truth. I have alluded to certain other scenarios that do appear to go against the previously known grain of what is normally expected of the USA. If I put on my "what if" hat, and think as objectively as I can, then, maybe there is something else, that will work better for America. Just suppose, if you want to try it with me, what would happen if we weren't so predictable to some of these more dangerous countries? What would happen if we stopped sending money to countries that have a more robust economy than our own? What would happen if we let the Arab/Muslim countries all alone to have their civil wars, since that is what they really want?

Sometimes, maybe the idea of being placated and sought out starts to sound better than apologizing and giving stuff away to those with no appreciation.

The 'giving stuff away' is bribery.
Civil war, yes let 'em have at it. But to assume that would exclude us from their desire to create carnage here is naive.

BTW, have you watched 'only the dead' yet? I'm going to watch dvr today. I started to watch yesterday, and
then a friend came over for dog training day.