This is a placeholder text
Group text
by BabyEagle4U on 15 March 2011 - 04:03
OMG Whateva. Go thump the hate thread.
by Felloffher on 15 March 2011 - 05:03
"Well according to your logic, there's nothing to prove God or scientific. So ya, round and round is your proof. Makes sense now. Diminutive box you live in."
You're correct according to my logic nothing is proven, but that doesn't mean there's nothing to prove. Until there is indisputable proof of how we came to exist (I doubt it will happen), I will keep an open mind and look at things subjectively. I'm actually kind of puzzled how you figure my views are narrow and simple? I'm not the one holding on to an archaic religion and dismissing all other views.
You're correct according to my logic nothing is proven, but that doesn't mean there's nothing to prove. Until there is indisputable proof of how we came to exist (I doubt it will happen), I will keep an open mind and look at things subjectively. I'm actually kind of puzzled how you figure my views are narrow and simple? I'm not the one holding on to an archaic religion and dismissing all other views.
by BabyEagle4U on 15 March 2011 - 13:03
Felloffher, your being objective not subjective with your posts before that last. (JMO) Your stuck on three dimensions of space and one dimension of time. LMAO
Seriously, it's only round and round if you dismiss the Bible along with particle physics, relativity, physical principles, photosynthesis, engineering, irreducible complexity and even inert uniformity for that matter to name a few. It's you who creates the circular argument. Those binary stars, solar flares are real, also matter mixing with anti-matter in Star Trek is real physics.
Just saying.
Soooo, if you have no care or idea what universe your living in, how can you object to everything as a possible truth by way of Biblical, scientific, physic etc ?
Your in denial me thinks.
Seriously, it's only round and round if you dismiss the Bible along with particle physics, relativity, physical principles, photosynthesis, engineering, irreducible complexity and even inert uniformity for that matter to name a few. It's you who creates the circular argument. Those binary stars, solar flares are real, also matter mixing with anti-matter in Star Trek is real physics.
Just saying.
Soooo, if you have no care or idea what universe your living in, how can you object to everything as a possible truth by way of Biblical, scientific, physic etc ?
Your in denial me thinks.
by Felloffher on 15 March 2011 - 15:03
BabyEagle,
If you want to worship a god that doesn't exist and wait for this fake Messiah to rescue you from the earth by all means have at it.
I only deny religion as being truth, let's stay within the context of the discussion. Just because science hasn't proved how we came to exist, it doesn't mean that I automaticly dispute every scientific discovery. I can live and eventually die in peace without knowing or having any understanding of where we came from. Hold on tight to your crutch if it makes living and explaining everything easier, but realize some people don't need to have all the answers to questions that may be well beyond our comprehension.
If you want to worship a god that doesn't exist and wait for this fake Messiah to rescue you from the earth by all means have at it.
I only deny religion as being truth, let's stay within the context of the discussion. Just because science hasn't proved how we came to exist, it doesn't mean that I automaticly dispute every scientific discovery. I can live and eventually die in peace without knowing or having any understanding of where we came from. Hold on tight to your crutch if it makes living and explaining everything easier, but realize some people don't need to have all the answers to questions that may be well beyond our comprehension. by BabyEagle4U on 15 March 2011 - 18:03
Felloffher, you don't know what I worship your pointing fingers in a selfish way for what eva reason. I could worship purple n yellow striped petunias and alphabet soup for all you know.
You totally ruined a thread based on selfishness and denial. You insulted epistemology, ontology and the value of theory. Great job though. Have a good one.
You totally ruined a thread based on selfishness and denial. You insulted epistemology, ontology and the value of theory. Great job though. Have a good one.
by devnull on 15 March 2011 - 19:03
To say that a dog forum member insulted such subject matter is to bring great insult to Descartes and all those great thinkers who succeeded him. WTF is wrong with you? Take your pretty little self and go campaign for Ron "i'm all talk but can't walk the walk" Paul.
by Felloffher on 15 March 2011 - 19:03
How is it that I'm in denial?
by BabyEagle4U on 15 March 2011 - 19:03
Awww this is the OT section. I wouldn't have said what I said if Felloffher would have attempted to support their position. They didn't. Dead end thoughts support nothing. Descartes huh .... LOL
by BabyEagle4U on 15 March 2011 - 19:03
What eva, you two can go round and round. Until you support your position regarding the OP .. have a fun spin.
by devnull on 15 March 2011 - 19:03
What good has religion and the concept of God or a god or gods brought? Nothing but tyranny. God is for the weak minded. An excuse to continue to steal oxygen from real people. LMAO, it says a lot when the Holy Roman Church finally decides to apologize in 1992 for persecuting Galileo.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top