I like Clint Eastwood but... - Page 2

I'm sure that the Civil War and Old West generation would look at Eastwood and think, "what a pussy. He only played a cowboy."

"Pussy generation" as opposed to the good old days?  When children with learning disabilities were called lazy, children with cognitive/intellectual disorders were called retards or dummies, were beating your children bloody was acceptable, where wives could be beaten, Jim Crow laws, and the list goes on.........

No Pussy generation as society generally not being able to deal with even mild adversity on their own without help of oppressive, statist government. Society where pioneer "can do" spirit is lost and where instead soft quivering society is demanding help from a nanny state.

Uh, Prager, not sure where you are seeing that......

everywhere. And it is sad and disappointing to watch it. 

Guess you see what you want to see Prager.  I prefer to see something different, and I don't believe what media choses to present.

Point being, Mindhunt, that you CAN see the examples you prefer. I don't think Hans sees anything that isn't inside his own head. He is certainly incapable of acknowledging different views and different circumstances when addressing other posters here !

Yes, MLK was a pussy. Instead of marching on DC and insisting that the state address the issue of civil rights, he should have encouraged blacks to take up arms and fight, kill and die to force America to acknowledge their rights. The guy had no pioneer spirit.

The same with those gays who want to marry. Why are they asking that the state help them? They should just demand those marriage licenses at gunpoint. It worked for the pioneers when it came to the Indians.

ROFLMAO

noitsyou. LOL Are you actually comparing MLK to pussy generation of today? No I am not talking about MLK that is your sophistry. I am talking about people who can not make decision about their own life and demand nanny state to support them. But since you dragged MLK here, unlike you, MLK promoted personal responsibility. I am talking about MLKs qotes like this one:
If a man is called to be a streetsweeper, he should sweep streets even as Michelangelo painted, or Beethoven composed music, or Shakespeare wrote poetry. He should sweep streets so well that all the hosts of heaven and earth will pause to say, here lived a great streetsweeper who did his job well.
I talk about MLK who said

I submit to you that if a man has not discovered something that he will die for, he isn’t fit to live.

And who said

The time is always right to do what’s right.

There is nothing pussy in these quotes and there is no similarity in it  in comparison to what we see it today. Most liberals have no clue what MLK stood for. He stud for equity and not for affirmative action.  Martin Luther King, in my view, was a conservative, because he stood up for, belief in the content of your character and not of color of the skin. 
Where now in comparison to MLK jr we have the generation of selfish sniveling pussies liberal voting themselves more and more free "cell phones". In my estimate such voting equals theft. And that is why I have problem with it and not just because what Margaret Thatcher pragmatically said : “The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.” I have problem with it on moral level too, simply because such demands if backed by force are immoral . IMO people should help each other voluntarily . At any time we are forced to help others where such demands are backed up by force of jack booted thugs with guns we are acting like fascists. I know that due to poor level of education here, such concept of voluntary help, even though if it worked for centuries here in US - the most charitable country - is foreign and not discussed too often. And that in my opinion is a problem.