Latest pedigree comments in the database

His titles are: Irl Dr Ch -74/-78, Irl Nat Ch -78
Pedigree: http://oi64.tinypic.com/iz2fm1.jpg
Photo: http://oi63.tinypic.com/wl96y1.jpg

Her pedigree: http://oi66.tinypic.com/ncfmds.jpg

Her pedigree: http://oi68.tinypic.com/169f3m0.jpg

Also Irl Nat Ch 1985.
Photo of her: http://oi63.tinypic.com/2iw0xvk.jpg
Her pedigree: http://oi63.tinypic.com/1zfn2bp.jpg

Dam: Anne (ISDS 101542), her sire: Int Brace Ch Craig (ISDS 72737), her dam: Kojo (ISDS 91047)
Kojo's pedigree: http://oi65.tinypic.com/10crw3q.jpg

All titles: Int Farm Ch -28/-30, Int Br Ch -29/-31/-32, Scot Nat Ch -30, Scot Br Ch -32
Also photo of him: http://oi64.tinypic.com/70uekz.jpg

Sire: http://www.pedigreedatabase.com/border_collie/dog.html?id=1596592-hope-d-russell
Dam: Hazel (ISDS 158100), whose father Vic ISDS128240 (http://www.pedigreedatabase.com/border_collie/dog.html?id=1728881-vic), and dam Int Sup Ch Dot ISDS127467 (http://www.pedigreedatabase.com/border_collie/dog.html?id=833395-dot---isds-127467)

Scot Dr Ch 1998
Scot Team Member 1996

Eng Nat Ch 1948

Who's removing pictures..... I own the dog ... I put her pedigree in ...

Memorial Video of Fieldstone Tweed

Uploaded on Jun 30, 2008 by Christine Koval

 

I believe Jess's registration number is incorrect. It should be ISDS 37142. 

4xHPJ, BOB, Youth Clubwinner, Res.Junior Best in Show, Crufts Qualfication, CAC, BOB

Ladd was neutered due to sterility, deafness and suspected PRA in the line.

What a beautiful dog! I own one of his great-granddaughters, Tiki. (Marquee Glowing Tiki Torch)

You should not remove pictures of ancestors

Harriot Roy 218222 is not a registered carrier of CEA. His father Vic
Morris' Mac 183767 has produced a pup suffering from CEA which makes Mac
a suspected carrier of CEA. If Mac is a carrier then Harriot Roy has a
50% probability of also being a carrier. You can not tell this by an
opthalmic test (vet looking into his eyes). Such an opthalmic test is
compulsory I think in the UK before a dog can be used to breed from and
also before running in the big UK trials. You can only tell that he
isn't a carrier by doing a genetic test (for instance by Optigen in the
USA).

People easily get confused by the statement "he was eye tested" thinking
that he then cannot be a carrier. But if it only was an ophthalmic test,
then he can be a carrier and he can produce children affected by CEA.
This holds for both Mac 183767 and Roy 218222. Where Mac meanwhile has
produced a CEA suffering pup so he is a carrier unless the vet made a
mistake. By the way this could be the case because a CEA carrying dog on
average produces 1 pup suffering CEA on every 100 pups he produces. Mac
produced 350 pups so should have in the order of 3 CEA suffering
children. But he only has one. So it is possible that this single CEA
pup is just a misinterpretation of the vet.

The child of Vic Morris' Mac 183767 that suffered CEA was born in March
1995: Katie 220095. She was probably diagnosed having CEA in 1997. After
1997 Vic Morris' Mac didn't sire any litters.

You can only be sure that a dog isn't a carrier by doing a genetic test.
If I know that a dog was geneticly tested clear, then it will show on
the pedigrees that I compile by a green "e" (older pedigree) or "en"
(CEA-normal on newer pedigrees). If it was geneticly tested to be a
carrier, or proven so because having CEA suffering children, then it
will be shown as a red "e" in the pedigrees.

So if you like to have certainty for Harriot Roy 218222, you should have
him geneticly tested.
Even if Roy gets tested CEA-normal (no carrier) it doesn't tell anything
about the status of his father Mac. Mac could still be a carrier.

I admit that this is complex stuff, but I still hope it helps.

Kind regards,

Teun van den Dool
www.bcdb.info

This dog is already registered in the database as McCallums Boss (note space between two words)