
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Prager on 02 June 2014 - 20:06
I am not pretending that i know hidden meaning of someone's statement . Joan I think you are stretching Paul's meaning a bit. There is nothing top be misconstrued. The sentence and the thought is quite clear and absolute. It would be good if PG would tell us what he meant. Maybe we could learn something. Here is his thought in it's entirety. :
Solid nerve = confidence
Weak nerve = insecure
"Dogs that are 100% confident never see a threat thus have no reason bite. Weak nerve or insecure dogs will ether hide from all threat or sneak up behind or bite when cornered. They are ensuring they do not get hurt. You can take a weaker nerved dog with lots of drive and teach them to mask fear by biting.
by joanro on 02 June 2014 - 22:06
Btw, what's your point?
by offdalip on 02 June 2014 - 23:06
<<<<<<>>>>>>
Offlip, if your dog doesn't bite and is submissive, and not aggreessive towards people , then you don't have the issue the op has. The dog park is not the place for all dogs.
<<<<<<

by Prager on 03 June 2014 - 01:06
Joanro:"I read the post as an explanation to op's dogs' behavior in that a 100% confident dog never sees a threat WHERE THERE IS NONE as in people walking across the yard, as op stated, who are being bitten by their Mali. But a "weak nerved= insecure dog", does see a threat where there is none and might bite, motivated by fear.
And I agree with that 100%."
Your explanation of what OP meant is confusing to me. So according to your point, you agree 100% that if stranger walks into dog's territory ( "across the yard" where the dog resides) then the dog, somehow should be able to determine that the intruder means no harm and poses no threat and not to be aggressive?
Prager Hans
by joanro on 03 June 2014 - 03:06
If you are so confused, why don't you go back and reread, carefully, instead of paraphrasing.
BTW, Absolutely, a dog should have the ability to discern a threat or a not, whether the person (child or adult) are walking a cross his yard or the parking lot at Wallyworld. At least my dogs can...... can't yours?

by Prager on 03 June 2014 - 04:06
I have a vendetta? Against whom? Well Excuuuuuuuuuse moi , that I have the audacity to ask a question when I do not understand your statement. You are really reaching now. And I am not paragraphing anything . This is a direct quote from your text :
100% confident dog never sees a threat WHERE THERE IS NONE as in people walking across the yard,
I will not paraphrase and you can explain your direct quote.. Or you can answer my question.
Here is my question. How come that " 100% confident dog does never see a threat WHERE THERE IS NONE as in people walking across the yard. " The people walking across the yard of a dog are not suppose to be seen by 100% sound dog as a threat? Why not?
by joanro on 03 June 2014 - 04:06
Not every person is a threat, where I live. An eighty year old friend coming to visit is not a threat, and is not viewed as such by my dogs.
If it was as you seem to be alluding to, that every person is a threat and dogs need no discernment, everyone will need a cat to protect innocent children from being dragged to the ground and shaken like a rag doll.

by Prager on 03 June 2014 - 04:06
Look Pray, this is very simple. Dogs are territorial animals. That so far they accepted strangers entering thair territory was a fluke which should not be expected. Their territoriality was sedated or inhibited by the fact that tranquility of the friendly environment was never violated and nothing negative have ever happened to them in their yard. They have seen people walking by from day one and all was peachy - ducky. But to expect such behavior from 2 dogs, where one being Malinois who are genetically very territorial and willing to back it up with bite and the other being collie small mix which are usually very alert and also genetically very territorial and even so rarely biting they are watchfully - alarm barking a lot. And then something happened . Tranquility was violently interrupted and the age of innocence ended. The dogs awakened into what ever their genetics predisposition tells them to naturally do. Protect their territory. Do not worry about weak nerves / strong nerves gobbledygook. THAT IS WHAT DOGS DO!!! They protect their territory! And these dogs indeed showed us that is in their genes too, in genes of a SOUND DOG is strong program in their brain to protect their territory. Only a numbnuts of a dog is not genetically territorial. It's a matter of survival reinforcerd for thousands of generations . Territorial protection and warning is one ( if not the only) of the major reasons why wolf was domesticated into dog. Pray,..... congratulations. You have 2 normal dogs.
Now as I WILL PARAPHRASE Clint Eastwood. : It is OK to get people bitten ,...as long as your dogs bite the right people . So be careful and manage your dogs in a way that innocent stay unmolested.
Prager Hans
by joanro on 03 June 2014 - 04:06
And that's why I suggested to the o p to put their dogs behind a fence. They have two unstable dogs who are causing a problem....simple, put up a fence and people don't get bitten. Lack of containment is the main cause for dogs to be killed. Put a fence up. Not real complicated or confusing.

by Prager on 03 June 2014 - 04:06
Joan. To a sound, mature, healthy, herding dog, every not familiar person which enters a territory of such dog who is not under supervision and leadership control of his owner may be and usually is, if the dog is not brain dead or degenerated or inhibited down by repetitiveness of the friendly people walking by( as was the OP case) , perceived by a dog as a threat to his territory. And that leads to the aggression. That is unless the dog is Lassy or Rin Tin Tin or overly friendly Labrador retriever or such . To perpetuate a notion that sound, especially herding dog can be kept in unfenced front yard without supervision and that such act is safe is irresponsible and dangerous in many different ways.
Prager Hans
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top