I am sorry for MY Bad Language and Behavior - Page 5

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

tristatek9

by tristatek9 on 17 June 2006 - 13:06

ROTTIE "Look at volume 30, #4, July - August Schutzhund USA, page 25. All results are posted in the magazine, they don't post the BH, OB, or AD results on the website. This was his last attempt at a national event, but the dog failed because of gunfire outside the trial grounds. Lukin was a real police dog that Tim trained as a pup and then got back due to handler hardness as an adult. He only had the dog back for three weeks before the trial." THIS DOG YOU SPOKE OF WAS TRAINED BY ME AND I GOT HIM BACK AND TIM PURCHASED HIM FROM ME!

grimmdog

by grimmdog on 17 June 2006 - 13:06

Master Trainer Timothy Helser, yes I remember the threatening email you sent me. It was after a woman contacted me for training. She stated she had determined not to train with you based on things she had heard about your dealings with others and a "feeling deep in her stomach" she had when speaking to you on the phone that came off as dishonest and BS driven. She asked if I knew you. I confirmed with her that I in fact did not care for you either and described to her the things that I knew of factually occuring. You contacted me by phone and asked why I would do that, and that you just wanted to "move on." (Move on is that nice little term you use when you've done something bad, dishonest, or just plain dumb, and you don't want people to see it or be informed of it.) I told you clearly on the phone that I talked to her because I could do so without your approval because everything I said was true and could be supported, and that ultimately my opinion of you was that you "are a con man and a pathological liar, who is not what you claim to be, and that in my opinion you are bad for my breed, my sport, and my organization." I then reminded you to never call or contact me again. You in turn then contacted the woman previously mentioned, and became so irate and aggressive with her on the phone she reminded you she was armed, had a rather large son, and would seek an attorney if you ever contacted her again. It was then where you retreated to behind your computer keyboard, where you feel ten feet tall, and sent out the email to us threatening to sue us for slander should we ever tell anyone our experiences with you. You then contacted my training director the next day, and I overheard him tell you almost verbatim the same "you are a liar" speech and to just go away. I find it amusing that someone accused of impersonating police officers likes to threaten people with the law. Seeing as how I'm a deputy sheriff, and have a lot of time in a courtroom and around the law, I seem to know that you don't have a clue what actually constitutes slander, and I know just what kind of dishonest and power driven person claims to *allegedly* be a police officer when they haven't earned that right. They rank right in there with people that claim to be National and World level competitors and "Master" dog trainers. Those people have earned their right to be called those, also. Don't get upset just because your web of deceit is being proven false here by members who collect information on you. Maybe you should just find another breed, or website. I think the GSD community is just too smart to standby and let you do this to them. So, make your attorney threats to someone who cares. I will never be threatened by you, to retain and keep quiet information that I know to be factually true, and standby silently while you continue to try and con people of who and what you are.

grimmdog

by grimmdog on 17 June 2006 - 13:06

I had posted apparently while Tristate was posting his. That is hilarious. While trying to backpeddle from being a fraud, he's caught in yet another lie. Rottie, if you are in fact a real person and not just another Helser aka that pops up only to defend him, where did you learn that info you posted? Did Tim tell you that? hahaha I should clarify I think it's hilarious he got CAUGHT. I don't find any humor in someone trying to pass other people's training and hard work off as theirs. But that seems to be a common occurence with Helser.

grimmdog

by grimmdog on 17 June 2006 - 13:06

"This was his last attempt at a national event..." What was the time before that? And does a failure on a BH constitute "an attempt at a National event" ????

by KÖNIGTUM on 17 June 2006 - 18:06

Error 500 'www.spd-k9.com' Unknown Host. huh????

grimmdog

by grimmdog on 17 June 2006 - 18:06

I hope it stays down.... but unfortunately he's probably just on there removing all the proven lies we pointed out and removing those videos of that "watch me break this dog's neck" helper work so later he can claim they were never there and we were all lying and picking on him.

by MikeRussell on 17 June 2006 - 19:06

The site isn't down.

grimmdog

by grimmdog on 17 June 2006 - 20:06

OK, I went to it right after Konigtum mentioned it and it wouldn't come up for me either, but I see it's up now. ??

by LaPorte on 17 June 2006 - 23:06

REGARDING BHs at the AWDF...read carefully - this is taken from the AWDF site. The AWDF championship is an IPO3 championship. You can enter with an IPO1 or 2 for a 'team challenge' (breeds competing - best scores from the levels combined thru some process). Back to those national level BHs...Yes, I know this is from '06 - but I couldn't pull up the entry form from last year to copy and paste it. "2-10-06 Tracking 1-3 has been added to the event schedule as part of the separate trial to be judged by Al Govednik. The entry fee is $60. The event will be scheduled as time allows. An FH Team Challenge has been added to the event schedule. This is not part of the championship, but is part of the separate trial offered by the host club for BH. The entry fee is $60. Entries to these separate trial events may be sent using the same entry form." Note how clearly it is written that there is a separate trial offered by the host club for the BH, and that later TRs 1-3 and FHs were added. It even says "This is not part of the championship" It's a great way to get more people involved, and I applaud it. However, if someone entered a BH in Gadsden this year, they might have walked on the same grass as the IPO3 competitors, maybe even shared the same judge or audience, but it was very very clear that it was a different event. I do give credit to anyone who actually walks out there on the field to attempt a title - even a B - BUT to talk about a national level championship BH is laughable. Sorry. Also, to quote Helser "We could have pasted but something's came up when I was on the field that my dog did not like ( like someone shooting a gun across the street ) My dog is gun fire aggressive" What kind of neighborhood were you in at the championship?? Open fire during broad daylight? Plus, a dog that fails because of gun aggression would perhaps not be in the control of his handler? I don't really care too much what my dog likes or doesn't, he has to do his job, and in a BH that would be some basic obedience.

by grauerschaeferhund on 18 June 2006 - 01:06

La Porte, When I agreed withyou in an earlier post, I did not realize you were bashing Tim. My agreeing with you,was referred to LuvCzechDogz and Mike Russel.I am for one done with this site, other then looking up pedigrees!So long!





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top