
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by EuroShepherd on 22 February 2012 - 22:02
This is a tremendous victory for all dog owners in Ohio and for Pit Bull type dogs everywhere!
Gov. Kasich signed into a law a bill that changes the definition of dangerous dogs and specifically removes the pit bull from being declared automatically dangerous in Ohio. The law starts in about 90 days from now.
Ohio went from having one of the worst dangerous dog laws in the country to now having one of the best and most rational! (Ohio was the only state in the U.S to declare all pit bulls automatically vicious)
I do not own nor have I ever owned a pit type dog, but I feel like celebrating!
Plus, what is great about this law is it specifically does not punish dogs who were protecting their owners or their home from threat and criminals.
http://www.lifewithdogs.tv/2012/02/ohios-pit-bulls-freed-from-discrimination-with-passage-of-hb-14/
the new law itself
http://www.legislature.state.oh.us/bills.cfm?ID=129_HB_14
by BMartin on 22 February 2012 - 22:02
Isn't Ohio the state that allows anyone to own a tiger/chimp/whatever the hell you want, yet a put is deemed vicious from the get go?

by Ryanhaus on 23 February 2012 - 00:02

(not the dog>always the handler, live & let live)


by Jenni78 on 23 February 2012 - 01:02

by EuroShepherd on 23 February 2012 - 05:02
Jenna, I feel you, if I owned a pit I would have been scared to drive thru here too. But truthfully, Ohio has more pitbulls than any other breed. I believe the population of pit type dogs in Ohio is more than triple the next most popular breed. The law was that pits needed to be insured and were supposed to be muzzled when out in public and very securely housed at home. I never actually saw a muzzled pit anywhere except at a free pit bull obedience class where I was a volunteer trainer for pits in a rescue.
The main reason why I never considered pit bull ownership was because I didn't want to have the hassle of the old law. Now I feel I have the freedom to consider owning a pit in the future.

by alboe2009 on 24 February 2012 - 18:02

by oregontnt2007 on 24 February 2012 - 19:02
Not all dog breeds are bad, I know of a pitbull that will like you to death & is sweet as pie!
I wish there was a universal way to get home renters to rent to anybody with any breed or size
to have them get the yearly AKC Canine Good Citizen test to prove it is a good dog
We use the ATTS! They go farther then the ACK CGC.
NOT all dogs are bad I have learned it is bloodline as well as how they are raised.
More people need to be open minded on this breed, just as other breeds
they should be judged on their character not the breed. How sad :(

by windwalker18 on 26 February 2012 - 07:02

by DDRCzechFan on 26 February 2012 - 08:02
Truth be told, I've been bit by more cocky little rat terriers, and the like that have the spastic personalities, the only difference? When a small dog bites, there is little to no damage, but on the rare occasion that a bigger dog bites, the damage is usually apparent. It amazes me that people don't take small breed bite rates into consideration because of lack of apparent damage, yet a bite is a bite!
As a past Pitbull owner, it angers and saddens me that I used to have to lie to not only insurance companies but people who used to see my pitbull and I walking down the street, but as an owner, we do what we must to protect our babies. And that's what a majority of them are; big babies.
My pitbull was the biggest candy a$$ I've ever owned. But there's always gotta be one that has a $hity temperament to ruin it for the great ones. *sigh*
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top