This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Hundmutter on 30 March 2017 - 18:03
by susie on 30 March 2017 - 19:03
Tan points, saddle back, bi - color...?
Out of the picture for me it´s a ( nice ) sable.
There are terms for black and tan, sable, and black, as "allowed" in this breed,
there are terms for liver, blue, and white, as "not allowed",
everything else isn´t even mentioned.
I understand it´s "interesting", but the breed should define itself about working ability, FCI standard (including the allowed colors), and health.
People are breeding for "eye catchers" instead of dogs fitting to the standard ( I will stress it again: working ability, FCI standard, health ).
by Hundmutter on 30 March 2017 - 19:03
@Susie :
by joanro on 30 March 2017 - 20:03
Sometimes it turns into this:
by beetree on 30 March 2017 - 21:03
I don't fault the OP for their curiosity. They simply want to learn to call something they are seeing, correctly. Does it matter to the dog or it's abilities? Not a whit, but if we asked that same question to every post here, we might as well not have a board or anything to discuss.
Some people like the details, others the big picture. It is all good.
by GSDGenetics on 30 March 2017 - 23:03
http://www.lchr.org/a/28/96/photo.html
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top