Swearing by high intensity exercise. - Page 6

Reduce the amount of food intake for better results.

Min, I thought you said your dog was full DDR. Or is that a different dog?

Beetree..I am ok with the current results and diet volume. Kitkat What makes you think its a different dog... Its the same dog and she is full DDR. Here is her ped:

http://www.pedigreedatabase.com/german_shepherd_dog/dog.html?id=2255830-anna-vom-haus-landry

Examples of a couple of my dogs that get what I consider 'normal' excersise: 

No doubts as to what you like. Unfortunately, the musculature you claim from this batch of pictures, with its photo quality and angles isn't seeming to mesh. And certainly if you do manage to prove your dog isn't just fat, any extra muscle bulkiness isn't a desirable GSD physique for obvious and already stated reasons. You really need to provide a proper standing side view picture. That shouldn't be too hard to accomplish knowing your previously stated cerebral capabilities.

Bee, I take it you're addressing mithuna... '...previously stated cerebral capabilities.' was the tip-off. :-) 

Yes, Joan! Sorry if I wasn't clear enough about whom I was addressing. The quality and angles of your photos are also, far and way superior to any that Mithuna offers, as well. Not to mention that there isn't an ounce of fat to be seen on your dog in the photos. Very sleek and muscles as hard as steel, to my eyes.

I have already demonstrated that bulk and definition can exist simultaneously. See Jay Cutler who is only 5 feet 9 inches but he competes at 275 lbs with under 4% body fat. Call him fat.. Being a tad under 26" at the withers, it is not unreasonable for a dog to weigh a solid 90 lbs.

Instead of snide remarks show a why mass and definition cannot exist simultaneously..

 

Steroids = small balls

My remarks are impassively written and meant as truthful and personal observations. If you are reading into them something snideful, that is coming from your own sense of unfilled expectations. It is observed that you alone *support your contention as to the quality of proof that you rely on for your conclusions. I feel no need to prove anything to you as your past postings prove out a high probability that all sensible rebuttals will be ignored. I simply won't be bothered.

*Edited: Shawnicus the puppy-culler(killer) hopes he has something to add in your defense? That perhaps, gives you one supporter who is known not to support the GSD standard. Frankly, I can't get too impressed by that kind of supporter.