
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by mobjack on 26 July 2011 - 02:07
I'm wondering if Preson has been mindkontrolled.
by Preston on 26 July 2011 - 04:07
Mobjack, if you studied Bernays and wall street advertising you would realize to a certain extent all folks are mindkontrolled. The mass media dispense govtprepared talking points. If you are or were an information officer you would already know this. Being a military man would allow you to have some basic knowledge of psyops.
by Preston on 26 July 2011 - 05:07
Alboe, my view is that personalities and personal details should have no bearing on this forum. I participate in other forums where that is different. This forum has a long history that you are probably not aware of. Lots of control freaks attacking folks personally and trying to drive them off with bullying, stalking and personal attacks.
During my life I have had more than one graduate degree and more than one professional license. So what, each article I reference should be ignored or if interest is there, read and evaluated at face value without making attributions to me. And if I was a licensed psychologist among other things, so what. Oli doesn't require listing of credential or publications in order to post, nor should you.
I was asked to come here by several to see if I could figure it out. So I have seen the same process that I noticed years ago, and this relates to bullies or apparent bullies trying to control and beat folks down over posts that they don't like. Proper forum etiquette suggests just the opposite. There is an escalation process here which I am "mirroring", so that is what may be confusing you. Are my motives the same as those who make a bullying response and personal attacks i.e. venal, status seeking, selfish. No. Now I didn't start this process of escalation but I am interested in the the projections and attributions applied to me in response to my posts and I wil participate as long as the bullies and control freaks persist.
You say I am secretive, I disagree. I have laid out information which is available to most with some mild data retrieval which although was previously secret, top secret, above top secret or even SCI or Q, it is now public domain due to publications, public docs that have been declassified, and exposed by media coverage. So this information is available from open sources. But some bullies and control freaks read this information and find it incredulous or upsetting, so they take it personal and start bullying. As some police officers know, especially those in police intel, intel agencies worldwide spend billions each year on "open source intel" which is what I now specialize in. I am interested in learning as much as I can, and am always open to reading about differing opinions. New ideas can be evaluated without bullying.
This is not about me and you police officers should stop trying to make everything personal. I never accused any of you of being on steroids, of being thumpers, stone killers, or corrupt, nor did I exaggerate research findings on this. But some of you have accused me of a number of things, making armchair uniformed DXs, implying age related memory loss, etc., none of which are true. I have presented a range of docs, articles, public statements by others for you to evaluate on face value if you are interested and so choose. Just because I provide a reference does not mean I accept it 100% nor should you attribute that to me. If you don't like what I post don't read it. If you do read the references and get angry due to your own issues, blame them on the author or yourself, not me. If you disagree, fine, so what. Say so, but no need to make a personal attack on me or play games. I hope this answers your question Alboe. There is really no need for anger, bullying or personal accusations if folks see an article or a post they don't like or agree with. I say just move on and let it go or post your diagreement sensibly without bullying or attacks. But that's just my view, folks will do what they want anyway.
During my life I have had more than one graduate degree and more than one professional license. So what, each article I reference should be ignored or if interest is there, read and evaluated at face value without making attributions to me. And if I was a licensed psychologist among other things, so what. Oli doesn't require listing of credential or publications in order to post, nor should you.
I was asked to come here by several to see if I could figure it out. So I have seen the same process that I noticed years ago, and this relates to bullies or apparent bullies trying to control and beat folks down over posts that they don't like. Proper forum etiquette suggests just the opposite. There is an escalation process here which I am "mirroring", so that is what may be confusing you. Are my motives the same as those who make a bullying response and personal attacks i.e. venal, status seeking, selfish. No. Now I didn't start this process of escalation but I am interested in the the projections and attributions applied to me in response to my posts and I wil participate as long as the bullies and control freaks persist.
You say I am secretive, I disagree. I have laid out information which is available to most with some mild data retrieval which although was previously secret, top secret, above top secret or even SCI or Q, it is now public domain due to publications, public docs that have been declassified, and exposed by media coverage. So this information is available from open sources. But some bullies and control freaks read this information and find it incredulous or upsetting, so they take it personal and start bullying. As some police officers know, especially those in police intel, intel agencies worldwide spend billions each year on "open source intel" which is what I now specialize in. I am interested in learning as much as I can, and am always open to reading about differing opinions. New ideas can be evaluated without bullying.
This is not about me and you police officers should stop trying to make everything personal. I never accused any of you of being on steroids, of being thumpers, stone killers, or corrupt, nor did I exaggerate research findings on this. But some of you have accused me of a number of things, making armchair uniformed DXs, implying age related memory loss, etc., none of which are true. I have presented a range of docs, articles, public statements by others for you to evaluate on face value if you are interested and so choose. Just because I provide a reference does not mean I accept it 100% nor should you attribute that to me. If you don't like what I post don't read it. If you do read the references and get angry due to your own issues, blame them on the author or yourself, not me. If you disagree, fine, so what. Say so, but no need to make a personal attack on me or play games. I hope this answers your question Alboe. There is really no need for anger, bullying or personal accusations if folks see an article or a post they don't like or agree with. I say just move on and let it go or post your diagreement sensibly without bullying or attacks. But that's just my view, folks will do what they want anyway.

by Sock Puppet on 26 July 2011 - 05:07
Preston,
So, you have knowingly posted all this to bring out the bullies? Nice guy. And to focus on the cops of this forum. *shakes head*
Well you have fun talking to yourself.
Sweet dreams.
So, you have knowingly posted all this to bring out the bullies? Nice guy. And to focus on the cops of this forum. *shakes head*
Well you have fun talking to yourself.
Sweet dreams.

by Preston on 26 July 2011 - 06:07
"And to focus on the cops of this forum."
Nope, Sockpuppet, wrong again. Go back and re-read my post. You are misquoting me.
But what else could one expect from one using such a loaded call name?
Cheers.
Nope, Sockpuppet, wrong again. Go back and re-read my post. You are misquoting me.
But what else could one expect from one using such a loaded call name?
Cheers.

by Sock Puppet on 26 July 2011 - 06:07
You are one popular guy. BTW, I am talking about focusing your fun on the police officers of this site to prove some weird points.
6 out of 14 0'fers is not bad. Keep your chin up.
Yawn, Seriously you are boring us all, look at the damn numbers.
Police Gone Wild? - pages | 2| 3| 4| 5| 6| Preston 611 53
Was 911 a False Flag/Stand-Down "Inside Job"? Preston 70 4
Problems with the Banking System according to Sen. Bernie Sanders & others Preston 8 0
Fast and Furious Preston 148 5
Return of Mass Layoffs a Grim Sign for US Workers ? Preston 15 0
DU > Just how big a problem is it? Preston 28 0
Homeland Security film causes an outrage - pages | 2| 3| 4| Preston 388 36
Who really owns America's Debt ? Preston 43 1
Govts from around the world admit they plan & carry out false flag attacks Preston 27 0
TSA foibles - pages | 2| 3| Preston 431 26
Rep Ron Paul says it's time for the Feds to end prohibition of Marijuana - pages | 2| Preston 210 11
Phone tapping story by UK major news corporation is the tip of the iceberg? Preston 42 0
Home forclosure crisis Preston 73 0
It's the County Sheriffs job to stop abuse by Feds Preston 160 7
6 out of 14 0'fers is not bad. Keep your chin up.
Yawn, Seriously you are boring us all, look at the damn numbers.
Police Gone Wild? - pages | 2| 3| 4| 5| 6| Preston 611 53
Was 911 a False Flag/Stand-Down "Inside Job"? Preston 70 4
Problems with the Banking System according to Sen. Bernie Sanders & others Preston 8 0
Fast and Furious Preston 148 5
Return of Mass Layoffs a Grim Sign for US Workers ? Preston 15 0
DU > Just how big a problem is it? Preston 28 0
Homeland Security film causes an outrage - pages | 2| 3| 4| Preston 388 36
Who really owns America's Debt ? Preston 43 1
Govts from around the world admit they plan & carry out false flag attacks Preston 27 0
TSA foibles - pages | 2| 3| Preston 431 26
Rep Ron Paul says it's time for the Feds to end prohibition of Marijuana - pages | 2| Preston 210 11
Phone tapping story by UK major news corporation is the tip of the iceberg? Preston 42 0
Home forclosure crisis Preston 73 0
It's the County Sheriffs job to stop abuse by Feds Preston 160 7
by Preston on 26 July 2011 - 07:07
SockPuppet, I have no idea what your point is with yur last post. You state my "fun with police officers on this site"? What? Where do you come up with this? It's from the inside of your head not mine. If you are so bored with my posts, why waste the effort going to the work to post about it? Sorry, but you make no sense.
By the way, as you know, A sockpuppet is an online identity used for purposes of deception within an online community. Interesting that you would choose that as a call name.
By the way, as you know, A sockpuppet is an online identity used for purposes of deception within an online community. Interesting that you would choose that as a call name.

by ggturner on 26 July 2011 - 11:07
gg, again you stalk me with almost each post I make and continue to make personal attacks.
If I were "stalking" you, I'd comment on every one of your threads. You over-exaggerate.
I've noticed that you have a much harsher response to certain people. Very interesting.
If I were "stalking" you, I'd comment on every one of your threads. You over-exaggerate.
I've noticed that you have a much harsher response to certain people. Very interesting.

by Sock Puppet on 26 July 2011 - 15:07
4 points, oh great one.
1. You have thrown police officers under the bus to prove your bullying point. Which is pretty lame and is obviously not working. All that is working is you are driving people away from posting, since you started posting the numbers in this forum have fallen off a cliff, I am sure Oli loves you.
2. The post showing your posts and numbers clearly indicate that NO ONE IS READING YOUR BULLY CALLS AND EVEN LESS ARE RESPONDING.
3. My name was choosen because your racist friends would not stop calling people the n word and bashing Jews. Now if you would like I can list all the racists that you are friends with, but why should I you know and the long term members know exactly your support for the closet racists among us. So, oh great one the name is to deal with the racists and the political whacks who needed to take over a dog forum and practicially wipe out a mans hard work.
My last point to you oh great baiter one. Where were you when your friends were doing all these things? I see now your friends have invited you back. Lovely of them.
Well I hope you have a great day as you are not likely to get me to respond further, but you never know as it appears you are really good at baiting people and you just might get me to respond if you work real hard at it. Good luck.
1. You have thrown police officers under the bus to prove your bullying point. Which is pretty lame and is obviously not working. All that is working is you are driving people away from posting, since you started posting the numbers in this forum have fallen off a cliff, I am sure Oli loves you.
2. The post showing your posts and numbers clearly indicate that NO ONE IS READING YOUR BULLY CALLS AND EVEN LESS ARE RESPONDING.
3. My name was choosen because your racist friends would not stop calling people the n word and bashing Jews. Now if you would like I can list all the racists that you are friends with, but why should I you know and the long term members know exactly your support for the closet racists among us. So, oh great one the name is to deal with the racists and the political whacks who needed to take over a dog forum and practicially wipe out a mans hard work.
My last point to you oh great baiter one. Where were you when your friends were doing all these things? I see now your friends have invited you back. Lovely of them.
Well I hope you have a great day as you are not likely to get me to respond further, but you never know as it appears you are really good at baiting people and you just might get me to respond if you work real hard at it. Good luck.

by MAINLYMAX on 26 July 2011 - 16:07
Preston good video...but you have to many post going.
These are the rules of engagement ...If someone does not
return intelligent rebuttal and insults you. Return fire
by saying... eat shit and die. Get off my thread if you don't have a
a polite rebuttal. If that does not work push the abuse button.
Maybe it will go to the website manger.
I have a question...
What was the life expectancy for a second lieutenant
dropped into a hot LZ in Vietnam in 1968?
2 weeks
1 week
16 seconds.....
These are the rules of engagement ...If someone does not
return intelligent rebuttal and insults you. Return fire
by saying... eat shit and die. Get off my thread if you don't have a
a polite rebuttal. If that does not work push the abuse button.
Maybe it will go to the website manger.
I have a question...
What was the life expectancy for a second lieutenant
dropped into a hot LZ in Vietnam in 1968?
2 weeks
1 week
16 seconds.....
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top