Conservative Christian caught in compromising position. - Page 3

Oh like black and white, faithful and unfaithful, gay and straight, Democrat and Republican or Christian and atheist? Yes, labels are everywhere and used by all people. Bad bad labels.

No, I'm pretty sure Obama wouldn't be able to pull off running as a white dude.

Slick ran as a "Christian" as well, whatever that means.

Slick? lol, now now watch the labels. SMH.

I see this has you a little miffed and maybe you should write the authors of the news stories because I didn't write this stuff. The man is a MARRIED father of 5 and a self proclaimed conservative Christian caught in a back and forth spit swap and you see nothing wrong with this and instead want to try and what??????????????? Discredit the story because of Clinton? Because 2 wrongs make it right?  WTH?

Here we go, lol.

Go back and read your last post, and then go back and read all of mine. How you are getting from A to B in any of what you just said is remarkable. If I though I had to, I'd sort it out for you, but as it stands, I still believe you're not that stupid.

I reread your posts and half of them reference Clinton as if it makes it right. The story here is not about Clinton it is about Rep. Vance McAllister (R). Funny the lady he was caught kissing resigned but he hasn't, weird how the woman always takes the fall. Why doesn't Mr Hypocrite resign? Probably because he has so many people willing to say well he made a mistake and blah blah blah.

The guy has a wife of 16 years and he is obviously in some kind of relationship outside that marriage whether it be kissing buddies, bed buddies, love letter friends or whatever. It is wrong and instead of the Christians of this forum shaming this man you all would rather shame gays and any others you disagree with or bring up Bill Clinton.
 

It is wrong and instead of the Christians of this forum shaming this man you all would rather shame gays and any others you disagree with or bring up Bill Clinton.,

What "Christians of this forum ",,have shamed gays, while supporting the actions of this man??,,And I expect an answer?,,Give us all a name,,,,Or are you just running your mouth?,,,

admin - you're still way off base, likely because you wish to be. You are certainly free to take my comments in whatever fashion suits your purpose.

Shaming gays? Christians dare not open their mouths on the subject without being accused of shaming gays!

Look at what happened to Phil Robertson of Duck Dynasty! All he did was quote the Bibical position on gays, and they shut down his TV show!

Phil DOES NOT hate gays. He made that very plain: "I am a lover, not a hater."  He just believes that God's perfect will for humans is for a man to be with a woman. What's wrong with THAT?  There are probably a lot of people out there who think the same way, but have to remain silent on the subject, for fear of being accused of 'hating gays'!

I've worked with quite a few openly gay people over the years, and never had any problems with them. One of my best friends from High School eventually decided she was a lesbian. We still stayed in touch for a number of years, though she was living 3,000 miles away. She was still the same person I knew back in H.S. But that does NOT mean I'd consider having a sexual relationship with her!  Nor do I feel that same sex relationships are God's 'perfect will' for men and women! Does that make me a homophobe??   Well, I guess in SOME people's eyes it DOES!!

Whatever happened to freedom of speech? 

Any Christian who says gays do not have the right to marry. Don't you think it is shameful to not allow two people who are in love to marry whether they be man/woman, man/man or woman/woman? Do you think it is right to deny gays the same protections as straight people? The RIGHT to happiness, love and liberty?

No names need to be named, members have already drawn the proverbial line in the sand with past posts on this topic.

 I'm not sure how it works, but I want to be able to pick politicians that will do the best job for the people. There is always something, like they were a less good parent, friend or spouse, but... We also have those that were great family people and less great at their job, or those that said they would do one thing and then did the exact opposite.

So, who is in trouble for this one?

The object of this politician's passion?

The one that uploaded it?

The one who filmed persons without consent?

The one who turned the lights out?

The one/s who watched?

The world is so wierd. We will have to watch and see.