Frost Kennels--Bob Frost - Page 2

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Shawnicus

by Shawnicus on 06 September 2016 - 05:09

Frost kennels = substandard dogs and even worse trainers , overpriced and a scam .. I wouldn't do business with the guy .

Mystere

by Mystere on 06 September 2016 - 09:09

The protest has been going on for WEEKS, now. This is the largest assembly of multiple tribes since the Battle at Greasy Grass aka Little Bighorn aka Custer's Last Stand. (60 or more). Protesters are arriving on hirseback, cars, trucks and busses. Tribes are sending truck loads of supplies. One would think that the unprecedented assembly alone would be news-worthy. There appears to be media suppression going on. Not much else to expose the near black-out in the media.

vonissk

by vonissk on 06 September 2016 - 10:09

Yes there are 125 flags at the entrance to the camp now of tribes there or who have visited. There are native Hawaiins (sp), Philaphinos (sp) Maori and the Aztecs arrived I believe it was Friday or Saturday night. Aha so you know your history also!!! I don't think anyone had any idea it would turn out like this. You know there are tribes who don't get along with others and they are standing together. No politics, no your ancestors did this--just a lot of praying, sweats etc. and folks standing together. It is going to be quite an experience and I am so looking forward to it.
Yes I know the handler you speak of--she was a real piece of work.
What I know right now is that the judge went in yesterday and did some work and the Obama Administration got involved and has placed a restraining order against the company doing anything right now. They are having an emergency court today at 3 pm in DC. This was brought about by the dogs and pepper spray incidents. So we'll see has that goes. I don't know if you're aware but the pipeline was originally supposed to start north of Bismark but then the Gov decided that what if it busted and ruined their water supply!!!! So it was brought down because I mean after all who cares about those Siouxs anyway. That in itself violates the 1868 Ft. Laramie Treaty. And folks need to understand it is not just their water supply but if something goes wrong it is going to affect a hell of a lot more people than just the Indians.
Yes for some reason its not been much on the news. I've seen it on HLN. MSNBC and yesterday it made CNN. If it wasn't the age of cellphones, social media, etc. I don't know how much we would know that goes on. Our news station here had no clue but they do now cause I talked to them last night and they are very interested.
LOL If I find your friend I will give him a shoutout from you. My husband's first cousin is a photographer for the Sota (pronounced Show-ta) which is the tribal paper for the Sisseton Wahpeton Oyate--he is up there and I don't even know if I'll be able to find him!!! There are 1700-2000 people a day--during the week anyway. Reports have been up to 4000 on weekends. And more are going in.
Again thanks for the info and being straight up. I thought I might could come back to my "old stomping grounds" LOL and find out a little more. Have a great day.

Mystere

by Mystere on 06 September 2016 - 18:09

Yes, indigenous people from all over are making it to Sacred Stone Camp and/or sending supplies. It IS pretty fabulous to see tribes that have been antagonistic for generations come together. The Sioux and Cheyenne were always allies and had friendly ties to the Arapaho. Did you see the busses the Comanches showed up in? BIG touring busses with the Comanche Code Talkers painted on the sides.

The minimal media coverage is unbelievable. There almost MUST be suppression at work. Such an historic assemblage of trubes would be all over the news, if it "just" a huge pow wow or festival. But, because they are trying to protect their sacred land, water source, etc., there is damn-near a media black-out. I understood the first week--it was during the Olympics...and sports are always more important than "some people." 😢

Mystere

by Mystere on 06 September 2016 - 18:09

Fi


Mystere

by Mystere on 06 September 2016 - 18:09

Forgot to mention, the pipeline is also being protested in Iowa, because water at that end is in jeopardy, too. STILL not the media coverage you'd expect when little white-haired 80 year old women are being cuffed and arrested.


susie

by susie on 06 September 2016 - 19:09

I may sound naive, but who is the owner of the land they want to build the pipeline through?
In my understanding they need a permission in case it´s a private property?

Baerenfangs Erbe

by Baerenfangs Erbe on 06 September 2016 - 20:09

I believe they covered that in one of the news stories that they don't need permission? However, they need a permission to pass through federal land

Mystere

by Mystere on 06 September 2016 - 20:09

It is TRIBAL land with sacred artifacts and burial ground in one area, the tribe's water source is subject to contamination. The government, via the Corps of Engineers supported the tribe's petition for a temporary restraining order. The Army Corps of Engineers must approve construction, as it has jurisdiction over some of the non-tribal land. The tribes are sovereign, per the treaties forced 9n them generations ago. The Imp of the Perverse simply turnedsimply turned some of those the treaty rights to the tribes' advantage.

Mystere

by Mystere on 06 September 2016 - 20:09

Susie, for non-tribal lands, it does not always matter that it is private land. Eminent domain allows the government to pay and take it. Tribal land is SUPPOSED to not be subject to it, because the tribes are viewed as sovereign nations, per treaty. However, the Apache may dispute that, as McCain & Co. SOLD land the Apaches claim to a foreign -based company. But, what's another broken treaty?





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top