Social Media, What responsibility? - Page 2

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

MAINLYMAX

by MAINLYMAX on 12 August 2011 - 19:08

Moons....
Some times I go into a deep, deep trance and see
visions of the world, with an apocalyptic out come.
Or I just live to make Beetree miserable.
The two seem some how connected!

The first time I heard of Black helicopters was
about 30 years ago. I had the very same reaction
Beetree has today...This is a crazy rant and not
worthy of my time.....

.

Than about 3 years later an Army Colonel came forward with a very credible
tell of urban warfare training. Since than, I will read what ever information that
gets by the News media on New World Order..Pappy Bush gave everyone
a heart attack when he used the term New World Order, in his Address
to the nation. Like everyone was going to embrace the Idea of a NWO.






by beetree on 12 August 2011 - 20:08

I had a vision, too....



Ninja181

by Ninja181 on 12 August 2011 - 20:08

Is that THING obedience trained Beetree? LMAO

Ninja181

by Ninja181 on 12 August 2011 - 20:08

This might be an egg that rooster had something to due with.


Myracle

by Myracle on 12 August 2011 - 23:08

This:


The social media did not incite the violence, how could it.
Problem solving begins at the source.






 

Just look to the so-called "Arab Spring" to see why social media is a valid form of free speech, and note the reaction of the totalitarian regimes.  They attempted to block access to social media sites, or simply shut-down all access to the internet and mobile phones.

The people of England are reacting out of frustration and anger at a government that is becoming increasingly totalitarian and oppressive.
So what is the government's reaction?

Telling, isn't it?


Ironically, social media has been an integral part of the riot clean-up.


by beetree on 12 August 2011 - 23:08

Be nice or go home, Max=Jon Luc. You try my patience. Be a good ... eh, whatever you can manage... oui?

Mindhunt

by Mindhunt on 12 August 2011 - 23:08

Instead of stopping the flow of information, how about making people responsible for their own actions??? 

by beetree on 13 August 2011 - 00:08

How do you do that with a mob? I think that is my question. Social Media makes the mob scenario, right now. 

MAINLYMAX

by MAINLYMAX on 13 August 2011 - 02:08

Max=Max  Beetree =control the media.

Two Moons

by Two Moons on 13 August 2011 - 03:08

How do you do that with a mob?

In the UK since there are cameras everywhere, they simply identified them from their faces on the video recordings.

Again, you can't kill the messenger just because you didn't like the massage.

Mobs in our country have faced water cannon, mace, clubs, horse patrols and riot squads, rubber bullets and at Kent State real live rounds FMJ .308, via the National Guard.

And of course our beloved German Shepherds along with a few other breeds.

Again, what was being protested? 

Go back and read our recent history, things like ending a war, equal rights, abuse at the hands of authorities, discrimination.
I don't think I would have tried to stop any of that history, remember womens rights, the list goes on and on.
In some countries it's about freedom and the very right to exist.

No..... you don't stop information good or bad, who chooses?

We've had this conversation before.


Back to the source, why is the violent actually happening?
There's where you should concentrate your effort.

Moons.



 





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top