This is a placeholder text
Group text
by leeshideaway on 01 February 2011 - 23:02
by Jenni78 on 01 February 2011 - 23:02
I bred a 69 to a 64
by Jenni78 on 02 February 2011 - 00:02
Upon re-checking, I amend my statement:
I bred a 70 to a 65;-)
I bred a 70 to a 65;-)
by JudyK on 02 February 2011 - 00:02
Jimbeam Talka Marda is 63.
by Jenni78 on 02 February 2011 - 03:02
Would be interesting to see progeny of him vs. his littermates who have higher zw scores. I wonder what the numbers of litters are on each, AND how many have been tested by the SV. The issue in interpreting zw scores lies in the WHY behind the numbers...often they are misleading. If a litter has a low zw as pups, and then many are bred and some aren't, and the ones who are bred have much higher zw scores now, does that mean that the one who hasn't been bred (or whose progeny haven't been scored) has/produces better hips? Of course not; like anything else, zw scores are simply a piece of the puzzle. I pay close attention to them on old, well-established breeding animals, not quite so much on young dogs or imports whose progeny likely were not scored by SV.
I haven't done any research on Jim Beam, have no idea what his deal is. I'm just speaking generally.
I haven't done any research on Jim Beam, have no idea what his deal is. I'm just speaking generally.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top
