A "De-Barked" Dog??? - Page 6

When it has gone as far as someone argueing the correctnes of her/his undfouded theories etc it is not a substantial problem ,that does not occur until the person cannot grasp the fact that hi/she is wrong and instead tryes to deal with it through ,more or less,inventing or sometimes adressing other completely unrelated issues. Since several members of this board appares to interprit everything that is written as being directed at them I feel obliged to clearify that this is not directed at those who does not have this problem.If you think that it applies to you,well your possibly negative reaction have got nothing to do with me,you will simply have to deal with it yourself. Now some might think that eaven the problems mentioned above should not be discurraged since it would restrain the freedome of speach on the site. However the secundary problems that develop because of these are a far greater threat to this freedome since it creates an atmosphere that inhibit many members to feel free to speak their mind. Some have eaven started appologizing for their oppinions eaven before anyone has chiritisexe them. Laris- Since you apparently cannot find any examples to support your coments ,not eaven after all this time , I will just have to leave it at that. I advise you not to make statements that you can¿t support or stand behind. - I did not address you,but if you are a linguist you allready know this. - Since noone has chown any sustainable arguments regading the real subject , Dearked dogs , and since my points have now been so clearely prooven it appares that any further comments are redundant I have no other choice than to consider it to be over.

I must agree with you zoe. Certainly a subject that should be discussed further.