This is a placeholder text
Group text
by k9neiko on 18 July 2018 - 00:07
by Sheryl B on 18 July 2018 - 02:07
by Sheryl B on 18 July 2018 - 02:07
by hermansu on 18 July 2018 - 03:07
by jlb4yoda on 18 July 2018 - 04:07
by Hundmutter on 18 July 2018 - 07:07
I find something so unusual about this story that I am seeking clarification, please, I don't care who from.
The first puppy, which proved unsatisfactory, was not of particularly special breeding, right ? The replacement puppy offered is / would be of VA parentage. IME it would not be unusual at all for the breeder (in this case Megan / k9neiko), who is clearly using better stock animals these days, not to be ABLE* to produce a lesser-quality breeding (to exactly 'match' the first puppy); and would therefore have been - like many other breeders - wanting to charge something extra, over & above the orginal pup's price, ( + Shipping), on the 'better' pup. Because it is a probably better pup, in some respect(s). That seems pretty 'normal' practice. [I'm not commenting on the 'rights & wrongs' of it.]
Whether or not the amount of that price would be adjusted to take into account the presence or absence of any existing previous Contract or other agreements is a matter for the two parties to resolve, in any given case.
So why in these circumstances is the OP, northernshepherdlady, apparently expecting to be treated differently / exceptionally ? Can anyone come up with the answer ?
*certainly not have a litter on the off-chance someone would want one, replacement, pup from that litter ... most breeders move onward & upward, rather than go backward.
This seems to be a relevant question to ask, because whether or not there were problems with the condition the first puppy arrived in, the main question seems to be the puppy later turning out to be unsuitable for breeding. (Vet's reasons for this not given here - which I find interesting, in itself.)
by northernshepherdlady on 18 July 2018 - 12:07
by k9neiko on 18 July 2018 - 12:07
by k9neiko on 18 July 2018 - 13:07
by northernshepherdlady on 18 July 2018 - 13:07
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top