We got our AKC title and high in trial!

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by GSDtravels on 06 April 2010 - 17:04

Let this ship sink.

by MaggieMae on 06 April 2010 - 17:04

by Sock Puppet on 06 April 2010 - 17:04

Maggie Man,

Yeah your shit has finally hit bottom.

by beetree on 06 April 2010 - 19:04

Boy we had a nice walk! This weather is gorgeous, my dog just absolutely loves it. How about you? Gone on any walks with your dog, or why bother, ...... you have a kennel now, of course! Just joking around, you don't go too far from the computer, trolls never do.

I am a witty one! Thanks for noticing.

by MaggieMae on 06 April 2010 - 20:04

by wlpool on 06 April 2010 - 20:04

GSDtravels should check her facts STRAIGHT FROM THE SOURCE NEXT TIME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! His number was there for you to CHECK YOUR FACTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Added:
Okay, now that I have finished training, I can go a little slower. I sorry for posting this now I just honestly miss a lot of this trash.
GSDtravels likes to put this here so lets have it here so we know EXACTLY what I am talking about! WINDY WROTE:
I told him that I gave his number out to shut you up the last time. He wasn't very happy about it but he understood my problem with the situation.
This is a PRIME example of how people here fly off the handle and make bad or misinformed statements without even the courtesy of investigation. It was just ASSUMED that I had not previously and on many occasions spoken with Rey about the VERY topic of the dog as it pertained to the database and the contract. I say again for the folks on here that need to read things a few times to "see" it. It was just assumed that I had not previously spoken with him about the topic of Amelia. I told him MANY times that I may have to give out his phone number. On the third or fourth warning he requested that it be his cell hence it being his cell. He also said that I had a right to give it out but he did not have the obligation to be friendly and I agreed that was VERY FAIR. This was weeks before I had given it out and in response to all of the WHERE IS AMELIA crap that was floating around. Had you NOT PRESUMED and checked, you may have found this little nugget of information before you posted a WRONG post. BUT, I do understand that it is the norm here and if I am going to be here I am going to have to put up with such extremists. BUT, shame that this forum has to be such a nasty place to be in!

by GSDtravels on 06 April 2010 - 20:04

What facts do I need to check W? I put up the threads in question and it's there for all to see. Need to see them again? It's got nothing to do with calling this man, it's got EVERYTHING to do with you LYING! LOOK at what YOU said W. Then you deny, deny, deny, deny! I don't have to call anyone, here it is!

Top names in Handlers, conformation?
by wlpool on 23 March 2010 - 20:03

wlpool

Posts: 378
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 06:00 pm
Bazza,
You seem to jump the fence when it works for your "point"

www.pedigreedatabase.com/gsd/user_comments/593102.html

I didn't see any titles on this bitch when you praised the fact that she is bred.
Please, don't misunderstand I am not saying anything bad about the dog or the owner. I want to point out how bazza jumps the fence when he sees fit!

I told you what happen to Amelia. I gave her to a guy named Rey. He is a rancher, his number is 361-675-0196. I told him that I gave his number out to shut you up the last time. He wasn't very happy about it but he understood my problem with the situation. You want to know so damn bad call him, he owns her not me.

If I would have known RR used him, I NEVER would have used him. That ALONE would have told me the caliber of trainer he was. I was NOT impressed with her dogs, their training, or their condition.
W

by beetree on 06 April 2010 - 20:04

No, that would be you, because you can't describe a walk with your dog.

by GSDtravels on 06 April 2010 - 21:04

We got our AKC title and high in trial!
by wlpool on 05 April 2010 - 20:04

wlpool

Posts: 378
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 06:00 pm
Who said I didn't have permission? I will have you know that I explained the situation BEFORE POSTING and he COMPLETELY understood my problem!
Yet another lie from an anonymous person, hmmmmm.

by GSDtravels on 07 April 2010 - 14:04

Oh, how tricky of you Windy, to edit your post (your M.O.) above mine so that it wouldn't bump this to the top, once again. You are quoting yourself and then making the "jump" that I ASSUMED. I assumed nothing. I read, copie and pasted YOUR words. I didn't even make a comment, I inserted music. Now you are putting YOUR OWN words in bold to say they aren't what they are! Let's break this sentence down into simple terms that a grade school English student could understand:

I told him that I gave his number out to shut you up the last time. He wasn't very happy about it but he understood my problem with the situation.

"I told him (definition of TOLD - PAST tense and PAST participle of TELL - to relate in detail; to give utterance to; to make known; to inform ) that I gave (definition of GAVE - PAST of GIVE - to attribute in thought or utterance) his number out last time to shut you up."

TELLING someone that you DID something is NOT asking their permission beforehand. YOUR WORDS! YOU stated that you INFORMED him that you gave (past tense, already done) his number out. And you go further to state that he wasn't happy about it! You deny YOUR OWN WORDS, but I'm the one who's wrong when I made no furter comment?!?

I said before that "You are either not intelligent enough to understand third grade English, insane enough to expect that others believe things just because you say they're so, or so used to lying and getting away with it, you don't know what to do when actually caught." I now believe it's a combination of all three.

Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top

We got our AKC title and high in trial! - Page 22

Pedigree Database