
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by beetree on 20 August 2014 - 17:08
Hundmutter, I am familiar with the work. Certainly when one reads the Wiki review, there are detractors to her own understanding.
I am not too concerned about how Travels evaluates me, to tell you the truth. Think whatever you want.

by GSD Admin on 20 August 2014 - 17:08
The unitelligence of it all is amazing. People who are not BORN gay trying to fit their beliefs onto someone else, just unbelievable.
I thought God was about love and forgiveness and accepting others as they are. I thought America was about freedoms and the right to be happy and secure in your home.
Travels has it about as right as can be. I don't ever remember thinking man am I attracted to boys or girls, it is just something that happens.
BTW, there are to many gays to throw a blanket statement over this and say it is upbringing and imprinting, really think about those words. Imprinting someone to be gay. LMFAO.

by Ruger1 on 20 August 2014 - 17:08
Well Chaz,,Just like you to start a thread like this and disapear!! ,, Did your "female" friend convince you of your error yet?,,lol,,My guess is that she will~ in time,,,,,,
Here is a link (copy and paste) to help you out,,its worth your time promise!!,
http://www.ligonier.org/iphone/media/2596/?format=html
http://s3.amazonaws.com/ligonier-media/series/hom01/mp3/hom01m3i01.mp3
,
by beetree on 20 August 2014 - 17:08
I do not think you understand the concept as it is being implied, GSD Admin.
And that is the expected depth for this conversation. No disappointment there.
You usually like statistics, why not toss them out to back up what "too many" means when you use it?

by Hundmutter on 20 August 2014 - 17:08
Well Bee I'm not too bothered about what Travels thinks of you either; I'm just concerned
that my own opinion about you may nose-dive. And you didn't answer the question, did you.
LF I guess we'll just have to disagree about whether the research you experienced in your
job or that which is out in the public domain carries most weight.

by Hundmutter on 20 August 2014 - 18:08
RS Thousands ? LMFAO - "SO THERE"

by LadyFrost on 20 August 2014 - 18:08
I will completely agree to that Hundmutter....i have never been the one to go along with the masses....so, no surprise there. :)
by beetree on 20 August 2014 - 18:08
I am sorry you must wait, my child needs me at the moment. Come what may, I suppose.
by beetree on 20 August 2014 - 18:08
What did I think you meant by the "pinnacle of time" ? In context, I thought you might be saying
we have reached some kind of 'finished' (perfect ?) state; that evolution Stops Here. How about
YOU answer the question - or I'll start to think Travels was always right about you.
Thank you for your patience Hundmutter. To answer the question and your take on what it meant by my use, then, yes, you do have the right idea. More specifically, natural selection evolution as the driving force directing future generations.
Saying evolution via future generations' selection method doesn't matter, is what I hear from everyone. I think that outcome is impossible and it won't happen like that at all.

by Red Sable on 20 August 2014 - 20:08
You're right Hundmutter, silly me, unlike you I was being conservative. I'm sure its more like hundreds of thousands. it's a big ol' world out there.. :)
Here is just some of them.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top