The I hate bible thumpers thread. - Page 12

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by VomMarischal on 14 March 2011 - 17:03

LOL Mollyandjack. I hated that Q guy on Star Trek.

MaggieMae

by MaggieMae on 14 March 2011 - 17:03

Max -- as you may have already discovered --- if you don't agree with the "group think" on the Board, you are then called a Troll.   The people who use the term are attempting to justify their being here.   It is also used when "they" cannot disagree respectfully, nor articulate a truthful response; that is when they resort to DFTT and other such childish nonsense.   Transparent --

mollyandjack

by mollyandjack on 14 March 2011 - 17:03

The son of man thing is supposed to be a fulfillment of prior prophecy ( I think Daniel?? great, I get into a religion topic and am not at home with all my old books) ""one like a son of man who comes with the clouds of heaven" or something, but it's debatable as to its meaning.

The debate between son of man/son of god gets pretty complicated..


by VomMarischal on 14 March 2011 - 17:03

Yes it does get complicated. The whole point is that it's not as simple as some people would believe.

mollyandjack

by mollyandjack on 14 March 2011 - 17:03

exactly. plus, history is scary. we don't need no stinkin history.

by VomMarischal on 14 March 2011 - 17:03

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
You made me have a coughing fit....

Sock Puppet

by Sock Puppet on 14 March 2011 - 17:03

 Maggie,

You are nothing, but a liar. You have done absolutely nothing wrong here, because you went and took out all your posts. You probably had Oli put them all back so you could take out yours and all the others would be left.

The bad thing is you have no proof to dispute what you said. In other words you said whatever anyone can remember and you have no proof you did not say it, but the rest of us know what you said.

By taking out all/most of your old posts you screwed up because now anyone can say anything about what you have said in the past and you cannot disapprove it.

I read one of two of your posts totally agreeing with DDR and telling her how you would miss her, now prove you did not say those things. Do you still write her like you promised?

StrayPixels (admin)

by StrayPixels on 14 March 2011 - 17:03

Making a note.....no dog talk on OT topic threads...

Who thought that one up?


I did Max because there are 3 other forums for that.

by Donald Deluxe on 14 March 2011 - 17:03

"Oh oh oh..... I'll take the big popcorn and a Diet Coke.

MM defends MM vs "the Lawyers"

It is going to be a hit!

LMAO"

Sorry to disappoint, beetree, but I have to follow my own advice:

DFTT. 

MAINLYMAX

by MAINLYMAX on 14 March 2011 - 17:03

VM,
           911..just kidding


Molly and Jack'
The book of John....is not sugar coated and tells you all you will ever need to
know...But is a hard lessen...He was the revelator and Jesus loved him.

Some people like Mark or Matthew or Luke.....it is up to you to say ..
as Jesus said....Who am I ???





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top