This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Shtal on 30 April 2012 - 15:04
GSD,
I have some other links, this should modify your thinking unless you strongly believe just because they are educational website that they are right; and you can trust them with all of your heart, mind and soul.
The NASA article concerns the so-called "starlight problem" - i.e. how could light travel millions of light years across the universe, if the universe is only 6,000 years old. You will find answers in these two articles below:
http://www.creationtoday.org/how-could-light-travel-millions-of-years/
http://www.creationtoday.org/other-starlight-issues/
take care,
Sincerely Shtal.
I have some other links, this should modify your thinking unless you strongly believe just because they are educational website that they are right; and you can trust them with all of your heart, mind and soul.
The NASA article concerns the so-called "starlight problem" - i.e. how could light travel millions of light years across the universe, if the universe is only 6,000 years old. You will find answers in these two articles below:
http://www.creationtoday.org/how-could-light-travel-millions-of-years/
http://www.creationtoday.org/other-starlight-issues/
take care,
Sincerely Shtal.
by Shtal on 01 May 2012 - 02:05
GSD wrote: There is so much scientific data that disproves your theories.
Hi, can you clarify what you mean please.
Thanks.
Shtal.
Hi, can you clarify what you mean please.
Thanks.
Shtal.
by Two Moons on 01 May 2012 - 02:05
Are you talking to yourself now shtal?
by Shtal on 01 May 2012 - 03:05
lol, perhaps!!!
If GSD has a secret to the universe - maybe he can share more clearly to me.
Shtal.
If GSD has a secret to the universe - maybe he can share more clearly to me.
Shtal.
by Two Moons on 01 May 2012 - 03:05
Sthal,
you wouldn't except it even if he did.
To except any other answer you would have to except things beyond the pages of your book.
I don't think you could do that.
Moons.
you wouldn't except it even if he did.
To except any other answer you would have to except things beyond the pages of your book.
I don't think you could do that.
Moons.
by Shtal on 01 May 2012 - 04:05
Their is always differentness when somebody running a mouth or logically explaining what makes sense, I challenge him to prove scientifically but all he gave me just a theory what he believes. (I need some solid proof)
I don't think he has an answers.
Shtal.
I don't think he has an answers.
Shtal.
by Two Moons on 01 May 2012 - 04:05
Sthal,
you can't be serious.
Solid proof?
Give me a break.
Moons.
you can't be serious.
Solid proof?
Give me a break.
Moons.
by Shtal on 01 May 2012 - 04:05
If you don't have a solid proof then how can you scientifically disprove the Bible. (That is why I said he was running his mouth)
Shtal.
Shtal.
by Two Moons on 01 May 2012 - 04:05
Proof is lacking all round is it not.
Science is a work in progess with many mistakes and theory, religion is no better and to rely on science for proof of religion is folly.
You have faith that what you believe is true, science on the other hand does have a few actually proven facts.
I put little faith in either one myself.
If your looking for proof you've already had misgivings.
Science is a work in progess with many mistakes and theory, religion is no better and to rely on science for proof of religion is folly.
You have faith that what you believe is true, science on the other hand does have a few actually proven facts.
I put little faith in either one myself.
If your looking for proof you've already had misgivings.
by Shtal on 01 May 2012 - 04:05
Moons,
Thanks for being polite.
I call science is when you can touch/test, see and absorb; you can't really call evolution part of science since it is only just a theory.
Shtal.
Thanks for being polite.
I call science is when you can touch/test, see and absorb; you can't really call evolution part of science since it is only just a theory.
Shtal.
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top