Any news on the Bartmess case? - Page 2

Someone SAID on the thread that it was her. Nobody paid the slightest attention. It's obvious...and it's not like she can disguise her diarrhea of the keyboard and her Frankenstein ideas.

Hans isn't aware of it as he doesn't try and figure out who people are if they change/make up different screennames.

Knowing Hans, he wouldn't boot that person unless he was positive it was her. (proof)

Proof is easy as pie. Good old all American apple pie.

Well I hope Janice rots in hell for what she did to the dogs and her own mother. 

I am now exiting stage left, SP is history.

OMGTPRTISYA

There is absolutely NO question but that "PeleKiebitzmoor" is Janice Bartmess--exhibit A is the website to which the "exclusive, copyrighted photo" of Pele v Kiebitzmoor is linked, tailwag.com.  That's Janice's website--a web search on her name brings up this site:

http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/egsg/2398.htm

and if you scroll down to the 'Requests and Queries' section, you'll find a request from her, with a hyperlink to email her: sbaypetinn at guess where? Yep...tailwag.com.

Exhibit B: same search brings up this site:

http://sophie-capri.blogspot.com/2009_07_01_archive.html

and when you scroll down to the section entitled, "Senate Can Vote On Animal Rights Fanatic", you will find an article which was forwarded to the blogger from...dun-dun-DUN! This is what you see:
"On Wed, 7/22/09, Janice Bartmess <webmaster@tailwag.com> wrote:"

So there's no way around it.  PeleKiebitzmoor is the Bartmess Harpy's screen name on the AlpineK9 forums.  I have to believe the reason Hans has engaged with her in discussion is because he didn't realize who "PeleKiebitzmoor" represented, and now that he knows (someone has told him, yes?) he will cease to communicate with the animal- and elder-abusing creature as if she were a normal, ethical, moral human being with a conscience. Hans certainly seems like a decent fellow who would never knowingly have anything to do with such a vile person...

BTW, a web search does turn up some interesting things...it would seem that Janice has a tendency to leave messages of condolence when people lose a child and there's a guestbook on Legacy.com. I'm beginning to think she really belongs in a mental health facility, because it's hard to reconcile someone who is clearly quite intelligent and well-read, who reaches out to comfort strangers on the loss of a child, yet neglects her own mother along with the animals in her care.

You just cannot make this stuff up! Good job, Hexe and thank you.

Yes, good job Hexe. 

It appears she has only posted a few times on Hans' forum and hasn't posted lately on there.  I find it ironic to bash Hans on this forum when it was known for months who she was on the PDB and no one banned her.  It was very obvious on the PDB who she was and what she had done because of countless pages and threads notifying everyone who Janice Bartmess was.  Months went by and the users of the PDB desperately tried to get her banned in vain.  All the proof anyone needed on the PDB was laid out in black and white, so yes the proof is as easy as apple pie when posted everyday on this forum.

Yet, she came on the Alpine forum and with a new name and in a few posts was called out and appears to be gone. 

Nobody bashed Hans!

But yes, it sure was frustrating that certain no-longer-with-us members kept supporting Janice. Yet more evidence of their destructive nature.

First off Slamdunc, Bartmess was banned after moderators were given the power to ban people and second Oli did not know about DDR-DSH. So your insinuations that she was left to do as she pleased is way off base. Pretty hard to ban her when the system did not exist beyond Oli and to be blunt, Oli is not the banning type, but he will not stand in the way of mods banning any member who after repeated requests and admin actions still insists on causing problems.

What are you trying to say? Are you saying Oli knew she was an animal abuser and he left her or are you trying to say the mods should have banned her when there was no system in place to ban her? It is always nice in hindsight to second guess people and backseat moderate.

I second VM's point no one bashed Hans.

VM,
Yes, that was very frustrating.  There are people here who will support anyone just to be contrary or argumentative.  They really don't care about the facts or the cause they just jump in to stir up trouble. 

What's important is that Bartmess knows now that whenever she slithers out, people recognize and bust her for her own special psychosis. I wish some of the really ugly parts of the pdb arguing had stayed, so that Google would be full of it for YEARS. 

Another important thing is that nobody should get sucked into her Hitlerian thinking when they read posts like her long, interminably boring rant on Hans' site.