12 Things you should know about Paul Ryan - Page 34

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Preston on 25 August 2012 - 01:08

Admin makes a very important point here that is valid.  Let's face the facts, Bush1&2 were globalists that took the Republican party down a bad road.  Bush 1 was responsible for arming Iraq, setting up the Sante Fe cross drilling of Kuwait into Iraq and telling Saddam the US didn't care if he invaded Kuwait.  Bush 1 was deeply involved in the JFK assassination and was behind much of the illegal drug trafficking into the USA.  He like Clinton were globalists, but at least Clinton went off the reservation and transferred tax payments from the carribean to the US treasury, thus leaving the nation in fairly goood financial shape (that's why his fling with Monica was exposed, to induce him to stop it and he refused and took the flak).  Bush 2 allowed cheney and jcs to do 911 and sold out the USA with more illegal, unprovoked, unConstitutional, undeclared wars which were responsible for many American soldier deaths and horrible disabilities not to mention many, many innocent civilians killed and wounded too. These wars have ruined our military and bankrupted our country. Obaba has basically done nothing he promised to get out of these wars in 30 days and reverse the economic slide.

The bushes have been the worst presidents we have ever had and they don't call Obaba, bushlite for nothing inside the beltway.  He is continuing the policies of the bushes.  The bushes have basically trashed the republican party and clinton & obaba has trashed the demcratic party.  Clinton murdered all the women and children at waco and trashed the Constitution.  Basically since JFK was asassinated (our last real president) we have had criminals in the white house). Lots of republicans voted for JFK because he was so dynamic a speaker and really was trying to get our troops out of Vietnam. What was the final straw for him was signing a PDD to print US Greenbacks as real US moneey, which was not debt to be repaid with interest.  The int'l merchant banksters went crazy when he did this, just like when Abraham Lincoln did the same.

It looks like Romney has a fair chance to be elected and if that happens I only hope that he will follow the US Constitution and Bill of Rights and will get out of all these foreign wars immediately. I would rather see Ron Paul elected because of his long term very positive track record.  Hundreds of private eyes have been hired to scour his past and they cannot find anything--he is completely clean.  The same has not been true of the clintons or obaba.

by RPKonig on 25 August 2012 - 01:08

Thanks for sharing your feeeeeelings GSD admin

I'll go with Reagan......Stood up to Soviets, believed in all his heart in American exceptionlism.

As far as Obama.............

We never before elected a President who promised in advance to ruin our economy by forcing energy prices to skyrocket. "So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can," Obama said in an interview with the San Francisco Chronicle, "it's just that it will bankrupt them because they're going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that's being emitted." We've never elected a President whose answer to a looming recession was to take as much money from the job creators as can be grabbed and fork it over to those who caused the problem in the first place... while throwing the most expensive inauguration bash for himself the world has ever seen. And you thought those AIG executives who spent bailout money on fancy weekend getaways were bad? At least we didn't elect them President.

America had never elected a President who deliberately populated his cabinet with known criminals and people of questionable judgment. But here comes Obama, nominating a Treasury Secretary who refused to pay his taxes,  and an Attorney General who pardoned terrorists and those who did business with an enemy state. Why not put GM board member Erskine Bowles in charge of Transportation, or America-hating professor Ward Churchill in place as Secretary of Education? Dr. Kevorkian for Surgeon General?

This is the first time we've elected a President who promised to lose a war and treat enemies captured on the battlefield as though they were American citizens caught committing ordinary crimes. It's the first time we've elected a President who promised to take away any of our Constitutionally-protected rights. It's the first time America has elected a President whose only legislative accomplishments involved ensuring that children who manage to survive an abortion, don't.

Never before have we elected a President who campaigned on the basis of giving everything to everyone and solving all problems. We were never that naive. Either you Obama voters really believed he could deliver on all his conflicting promises, or didn't care how much he lied to the other guys as long as YOUR agenda item was taken care of. We never before elected a President because of his skin color, or because he could read a script well, or because he looked nice on camera and had a soothing voice. But now we have the American Idol President,  the "community organiser" who worked his way up through the Chicago political machine by hobnobbing with known terrorists and fiery anti-American radical preachers.

If enough big-government Democrats and, yes, big-government Republicans are replaced at both State and national levels in 2012, we may yet have a chance to stop this slide. But I'm afraid we have already passed the high point of America's greatness, and too many will settle for the immediate gratification of getting something for "nothing" to turn the country from its path. Entitlements has become a drug to which more and more people have become addicted to every day since 2008 until our next 2012 election.

America's election of an inexperienced, untested, far-Left candidate who made promises no one could deliver will be seen in the future either as an anomaly or the real beginning of America's decline. Whether that anomaly becomes the norm depends on us.


Thanks for being as good sport and reading,

Best of luck

by Preston on 25 August 2012 - 01:08

Yes, Reagan started a better course but was stopped short by bush1 ordered mkultra assassination attempt.  Most folks do not know what Reagan was doing that caused bush to react with such desperate measures. 

Reagan used secret agent Leo Wanta to bust out the soviets financially which was actually a huge and worthy achievement.

His down side was that when he was CA governor he got involved with some bad folks who conned him into basically releasing hundreds of handicapped, retarded and mentally ill loose in the streets to die (I don't think he understood the ramifications of what he was doing to cut social service costs. He also was conned by the VP over Iran Contra which was in reality arms out for drugs back in nicaragua and hostages released for illegal weapons for Iran.  Whern he found out about the huge volume of drugs brought into Mena Ark, he went ballistic and that's what set off the asassination attempt.  Overall I think reagan meant well but really wasn't sophisticated enough to control his CIA VP.

GSD Admin (admin)

by GSD Admin on 25 August 2012 - 01:08

Hey Preston,

Glad to see you posting again. I hope you will spread your knowledge around to all forums.

GSD Admin (admin)

by GSD Admin on 25 August 2012 - 02:08

RPK,

You are right we should just take away all entitlements including those living off any government money, including those who work for the military and it's contractors. Farms, screw'em who needs to eat.

Corporate welfare, tax loopholes for the rich, the elderly and those disabled.

RPK ever heard of compassion for those who have less and those who maybe are down on their luck through no fault of their own. It is called compassion and helping those with less. Those like YRs son who needs extra help to survive. You sir have the compassion of a black widow killing her mate.

Go ahead keep telling us how helping sick people with no insurance is a bad thing. Really a cold cold cold soul you posses?

by Preston on 25 August 2012 - 02:08

Again Admin makes very good points.  Basically the main reasons of govt are to serve the people, restrain the abusive from harming the weak, provide reasonable programs to help the unemployed get back on their feet and keep monopolies, provide help to the sick, elderly and seriously disabled, and pfrevent restraint of trade from occurring. All while providing a reasonable ability to defend (note the use of the word defend) against any foreign aggression on US shores (not abroad).  When the financial production and distribution system is corrupted as ours has become in the USA and now most of the free world through the debasement of money and glosablization via Nafta, Cafta, Gatt & Wto, industrial jobs are exported, int'l corporations profits rise and the economies of most western nations collapse.  Monopolies have developed in many areas.  So much inflation has occurred in health care that it is difficult for many folks to afford it anymore or buy health ins either.  Obab's plan is not solution, but I will lay it out as priovided by some of the top world's economists.

The first solution is to get the economy booming again through energy independence, re-activation of clean coal, use of tariffs to create "fair trade" instead of free trade, etc.  If I am sounding like a democrat, actually I am not.  But many years ago there were very few differences between both parties, democrats more for labor and repubs more for big business within limits, but all for rule of law and the US Constitution as the rule of the land, the final word (now it has been crushed by tyranny inside the beltway). Many problems evaporate with cheap and abundant energy, adequate roads, and lots of jobs and this is only possible with the re-industrialization of America and complete 100% discontinuance of foreign oil imports and cheap manufactured good from China and other third world countries.  As experts know the world is literally awash in oil and the oil companpies work hard to maintain their cartels and keep prices high. And they do this for a globalist agenda because their lesaders are in "the NWO club". 

There is so much oil available in US territory that gasoling could easily be $1.25 a gallon and diesel $.95 a gallon.  Plus the use of thorium reactors can be 100% safe, cheap and easily deployed. And cold fusion is very close to being ready for use as is the use of water powered engines operated via catalysts that breakdown water into combustible hydrogen or directly energizing fuel cell run by plain water. The oil companies and other large entities are denying us this technology because they are based on large interdepenedent cartels that are using massive oil revenues to asset strip western nations and globalize the world into a NWO system.  And last but not least, top fortune 500 CEO and large int'l corp CEO's pay in the USA has become insanely out of whack to reality, occuring no where else in the world.  This is all due to lack of competition and lack of enforcement of anti-trust laws. America is the wealthiest nationstate in the world and if we stopped all the asset stripping by the offshore based globalidss, created a sound money system (NOT based on debt notes but eal money) and reindustrialized America, there could be plenty of good paying jobs for all.  Our Fonding Fthaers licensed corporations for one year at a time only and never wished them to have the rights of persons which they now have gained.

We must stop wasting over 1/3 our budget on illegal, unConstitutional, unprovoked, wars which were started for mere war profiteering. I haven't run into many Americans, democrat or republican who don't agree with these basic ideas. Entitlements and welfare are not needed to any great extent if there are plenty of good jobs and these can easily be created through common sense changes we all want. The vast majority of folks on welfare assistance would prefer to have a good paying job. Even disabled folks can work out of their homes part or full time via computer in many cases if the jobs were made avaiable by a booming economy.

GSD Admin (admin)

by GSD Admin on 25 August 2012 - 03:08

The problem Prestion those jobs are out there, they are just in other countries. Place a call to most company call centers and those jobs are in another country, great but how is that helping here? Cheaper prices? I doubt it. More profits, you be the judge.

PRK,

The Bush era taxes cuts created how many millions of jobs?

by RPKonig on 25 August 2012 - 03:08


Judge my compassion on what I can do to make others learn to help themselves.
 



Look at YOUR (Obama's) OWS 99%ers
. With no thought given to sanitation, food distribution, medical issues or sleeping arrangements they swarm in parks and sit on sidewalks bemoaning the fact that the gravy train ends at 18, or 21. Or maybe 26. Or ever. They've always been cared for by others, and on the cusp of adulthood, they have no idea how to become adults. They demand that someone feed them, take them to the bathroom, entertain them and tuck them in at night. At the age of two, that's cute. At twenty-two, it's pathetic. And yet Democrats, including the President, encourage them -- encourage dependence on government and envy of the rich. A dependent population is a biddable population.

They want banks abolished and free education guaranteed because many of them will soon graduate (or have recently done so) with no idea how to get a job so they can pay the student loans they owe. Perhaps if we had forced them to take classes in Business Administration or Accounting instead of majoring in Angry Women's Studies and Medieval French Poetry, they would.

The protesters want borders abolished because they want others to come cut their lawns, cook their food, wash their dishes and make their beds. They don't even realise that illegals take menial jobs because they can't get any other kind, not because they have a racial predilection for landscaping and vacuuming.

They want a guaranteed "living wage," free housing and free health care, even for the unemployed. With no idea how to earn an honest buck, a government-mandated check is the only way they'll be able to survive in a real world they've never been trained to face. They can't understand that someone has to provide all those things, either directly or through paying taxes. A collectivist system, under which people are forced to work for the benefit of others, has had many labels: fascism, communism, totalitarianism, even slavery. These protesters (including you GSD admin)have never been taught that charity only has moral value when it's voluntary.

 


GSD Admin (admin)

by GSD Admin on 25 August 2012 - 03:08

Wow.




Everyone wants a free rider because you can live like a king on disability, social security, unemployment and welfare. Everyone wants this bad, you seriously have the wrong impression of the down and out. You might want to get out more and see the real USA a little more. I am done here you have a real twisted sense of what is real and what you make up.

by RPKonig on 25 August 2012 - 03:08

Apparently you have never been taught that charity only has moral value when it's voluntary.

Sleep on it.





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top