Game Changer! - Page 12

Bee, of course you were being sarcastic.

And yes, I do have realistic vision.

Bee, your insults are so redundant and predictable.

Trumpetista is in dinky hickory, nc with his side kick krispy creem... They have an over rehearsed infomercial going on with an audience of about fifty dumbass kids rooten and applauding in response to the appropriate prompters being lit up.
What a joke.

@GSD Here it comes. The big spin. Please, what is disturbing you more than what you say is disturbing me? What is "Perfect just perfect."?

Money? How so? Now you are really stretching out on a limb. Where in the world is this coming from?

 

@Joan, you are blip. I can't take you seriously. 
 

Trump vs Putin is serious. You just aren't able to understand..

Speaking of your man, Putin, he pulled his troops out of Syria according to MSNBC.

Trump seems to tap into a core of anger and that anger is usually directed at non-white minorities.  I will never vote for him, I think he will do great harm to this country.  You can't run a country like a business, especially by someone with questionable business practices and four bankruptcies.  He is proud of the fact that he does not use diplomacy and I would like to see him shout "get him outta here" to Putin's or some other world leader's face.  Sheesh, I am thinking Hilary rather than this angry buffoon.

Beetree, I am finding it difficult to reconcile the fact that someone as intelligent as you is voting for this dangerous malignant narcissist if the other option is Hilary.....

@Joan— You can't help saying something idiotic, can you.

VK –
It’s difficult to address you here because while I am familiar with the trash being fed to our own, I have no idea what the daily and weekly cycles contain over your way. Likewise, I am not at all familiar with how your cultural mores inform the way you all process, or would process that garbage.
The argument is convoluted to the point where we’ve gone from accusing a candidate (and by proxy, his supporters, including protected groups) as racists, and then somehow suggesting without any substantiation whatsoever that the only pretense under which one might support that candidate would be if they also were also racist. To give you an idea how deep runs the abortion of logic within run-of-the-mill political discourse in the US, it is now evidently acceptable to make incendiary (and incomplete) claims against individuals not only without sound reasoning but all the while trying to shift the burden of proof.
What I will say is although I am not even close to hearing all of Trumps speeches in context or no, nothing I have heard is any sort of indictment that he is racist. I know how it could be taken as such if convenient, particularly considering the fact that he won’t pander by clarifying or backing off of his abrasive remarks. I suspect this is so because part of his strategy seems to be coming off as the “I’m sick of political correctness” infecting every facet of US society. Regardless, The fact is there are numerous minorities who support him (many high profile who know him personally) who would likely testify otherwise. The racist narrative is one 4 years in the making, a disgusting attempt to galvanize the black post-Barry era black vote at the cost of more than a few American lives. The last thing I will say on the matter of race is by the methods and standards adhered to by the “journalists” and their minions, it would be just as easy to label Hillary Clinton as such. Yes, really.
I have no interest in systematically dissecting what has been said by the slobs behind news desks or pieced together by their producers. Suffice to say to that I would not be the first or best by long shot –the information is readily available. Beyond that, I’m not going to go out of my way to defend a man that I differ with on so many issues, just plain do not care for, and would never vote for if we did not find ourselves without a more viable option.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-35807689You can't keep up, bee.

Mindhunt, you like everyone else is assuming what even I don't know. I am entitled to my poor opinion of Hillary, in my view she has earned it. Voting is private. I promise everyone here, I will never tell anyone here how I end up voting.

I want a discussion of the current events as they are unfolding. I find that interesting but mostly, everyone else here is only looking for someone to demonize.

Truly, mind blowing to me.

If you ask me, no way would Trump treat Putin like those protesters/disrupters. That would be a disaster as he's fond of saying. He's a deal maker, after all. That seems so basic to me, I wonder why it isn't so obvious to everyone else! Except that there are political agenda's being adhered to. It makes no sense to me any other way.

Just because I can say what I think might happen in such a situation is no guarantee that I think he's the best choice for President. I wrote the other post, and called it, IMPOSSIBLE CHOICES. But that once again gets lost on everyone here, for the umpteenth time. I am not the one with an agenda, I can promise you that!

I enjoy discussing the possibilities as they evolve from the probabilities. Why is that so hard for everyone? Don't people like to discuss and debate because it is stimulating to the mind? I save my sarcasm for those asking for it, however, when it comes down to inane jabs as their own contributions.