
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by OnyxGSD on 04 December 2011 - 16:12
Betty,
Introductions, titles, status is not entirely relevant or necessary to disclose, as it just didn't sit well to be addressed as 'girl', personal preference. It seems that many, new users have recently joined various sites in an attempt to voice their opinions, share information, propose alternative outcomes, etc., that's part of the purpose in forming groups. It's clear that those raising questions are quickly singled out, again, expected when a group is conversing.
Respectfully yours.
Introductions, titles, status is not entirely relevant or necessary to disclose, as it just didn't sit well to be addressed as 'girl', personal preference. It seems that many, new users have recently joined various sites in an attempt to voice their opinions, share information, propose alternative outcomes, etc., that's part of the purpose in forming groups. It's clear that those raising questions are quickly singled out, again, expected when a group is conversing.
Respectfully yours.

by OnyxGSD on 04 December 2011 - 16:12
Jenni,
Have you read the accusations listed throughout the police report?
Have you read the accusations listed throughout the police report?
by Dobermannman on 04 December 2011 - 16:12
Working Dogz writes:
I think it's wise to wait for the official necropsy/toxicology results to come in.
For those of you that seem to be of firm belief that the dog got hit by a truck/semi, have you actually contacted Al to ask him for a clear and concise breakdown of that morning?
Why not go to the source?
I know we did.
>So anybody that believes the Police report and Necropsy and what they see on the TV reports
>should contact Al for an explanation (clear and concises breakdown)?
>Are you a stranger who just called and said "what's up Al?" or did you already know him?
Betty wrote:
If your desire to be addressed in a manner that shows respect for your senior status, perhaps you should compose an introductory post? I only scanned your prior posts (wasn't too difficult since you just joined and had only posted to this thread) but I did not see anything that indicated age or experience.
Personally I don't care if you do or not but it does appear to be important to you.
>Betty
>Reread the posts Red Sable addressesd OnyxGSD as OnyxGIRL
>Onyx GSD's reply was obviously a response to being called GIRL
Thomas Barriano
Dubheasa Germania (11/05/99-08/11/08) SchH III M R Brevet AKC WD III AWD 1 STP 1 CD WAC TT
Ascomannis Jago (06/20/03) SchH III AKC WD III AWD I TT WAC
Belatucadrus (08/14/05) DS BH TT MR I
Flannchadh von der Bavarianburg (5/21/08) BH STP I
I think it's wise to wait for the official necropsy/toxicology results to come in.
For those of you that seem to be of firm belief that the dog got hit by a truck/semi, have you actually contacted Al to ask him for a clear and concise breakdown of that morning?
Why not go to the source?
I know we did.
>So anybody that believes the Police report and Necropsy and what they see on the TV reports
>should contact Al for an explanation (clear and concises breakdown)?
>Are you a stranger who just called and said "what's up Al?" or did you already know him?
Betty wrote:
If your desire to be addressed in a manner that shows respect for your senior status, perhaps you should compose an introductory post? I only scanned your prior posts (wasn't too difficult since you just joined and had only posted to this thread) but I did not see anything that indicated age or experience.
Personally I don't care if you do or not but it does appear to be important to you.
>Betty
>Reread the posts Red Sable addressesd OnyxGSD as OnyxGIRL
>Onyx GSD's reply was obviously a response to being called GIRL
Thomas Barriano
Dubheasa Germania (11/05/99-08/11/08) SchH III M R Brevet AKC WD III AWD 1 STP 1 CD WAC TT
Ascomannis Jago (06/20/03) SchH III AKC WD III AWD I TT WAC
Belatucadrus (08/14/05) DS BH TT MR I
Flannchadh von der Bavarianburg (5/21/08) BH STP I
by Dobermannman on 04 December 2011 - 16:12
NO Jen "Ms Bitch" Williams, the search has been for the person (s) that stole and murdered Hex NOT
for information. I'm not interested in what Red Sable meant or what you think whe meant. I know what she said
and she said
"If he swerved to hit it, of course that is a different story."
which to anyone with a forth grade education opens the possibility of another what if instead of dealing with the facts in the police report and necropsy
Thomas Barriano
for information. I'm not interested in what Red Sable meant or what you think whe meant. I know what she said
and she said
"If he swerved to hit it, of course that is a different story."
which to anyone with a forth grade education opens the possibility of another what if instead of dealing with the facts in the police report and necropsy
Thomas Barriano
by Betty on 04 December 2011 - 16:12
For goodness sakes, big fricken deal Thomas. Onyxgirl is actually a common handle on several boards and it could of just been an error. Certainly did not call for a schoolmarmish lecture on etiquette.
The entire thing is just silly.
Ironically, initially I really leaned to the assumption that chances were Hex just wandered off like dogs do at times. After seeing the attempts to discredit the investigation, paint any emotional or financial supporter as a hysterical patsy, and what I see as a concentrated effort to shut down the investigation it really does beg the question "why"
If there is nothing to hide or fear let the investigation run it's course as deemed appropriate by the people paying for it.
The entire thing is just silly.
Ironically, initially I really leaned to the assumption that chances were Hex just wandered off like dogs do at times. After seeing the attempts to discredit the investigation, paint any emotional or financial supporter as a hysterical patsy, and what I see as a concentrated effort to shut down the investigation it really does beg the question "why"
If there is nothing to hide or fear let the investigation run it's course as deemed appropriate by the people paying for it.

by GSD Admin on 04 December 2011 - 16:12
Do you mean FOURTH grade education?
Onyxgirl is also a member here, could be a simple mistake.
Onyxgirl is also a member here, could be a simple mistake.

by OnyxGSD on 04 December 2011 - 16:12
Hello All,
I apologize for stealing the attention away from the true topic, in my reference to the username error, no hurt feelings here.
Many people have made insightful and responsible comments throughout these forums and I hope that continues and name calling subsides.
I apologize for stealing the attention away from the true topic, in my reference to the username error, no hurt feelings here.
Many people have made insightful and responsible comments throughout these forums and I hope that continues and name calling subsides.
by Dobermannman on 04 December 2011 - 17:12
Yes FOURTH grade
Might have been a simple oversight, in which case there was no need for any comments from Betty
about "school marmish lecturers" etc. OnyxGSD made a simple request not to be addressed as "girl"
There are a LOT of people that demand everyone follow rules that they themselves ignore,
Thomas Barriano
Might have been a simple oversight, in which case there was no need for any comments from Betty
about "school marmish lecturers" etc. OnyxGSD made a simple request not to be addressed as "girl"
There are a LOT of people that demand everyone follow rules that they themselves ignore,
Thomas Barriano
by Betty on 04 December 2011 - 17:12
Thomas, you really seem to have a need to moderate this thread.
Og's comment to RS was probably not called for.
My comment on her comment was probably not called for.
Your comment on my comment on her comment was probably not called for.
And the beat goes on......... LOL
But really, is it that important to you?
Og's comment to RS was probably not called for.
My comment on her comment was probably not called for.
Your comment on my comment on her comment was probably not called for.
And the beat goes on......... LOL
But really, is it that important to you?
by Dobermannman on 04 December 2011 - 17:12
Betty writes
The entire thing is just silly.
Ironically, initially I really leaned to the assumption that chances were Hex just wandered off like dogs do at times. After seeing the attempts to discredit the investigation, paint any emotional or financial supporter as a hysterical patsy, and what I see as a concentrated effort to shut down the investigation it really does beg the question "why"
>Gee Betty "hysterical patsy" a little melodramatic and paranoid?
>What "concentrated effort to shut down the (private) "investigation"?
>More and more people are just saying read the OFFICIAL reports, listen to the TV interviews.
>So now saying, "look at the facts means" there must be some ulterior motive and "we're" trying to hide
>something?...............................SILLY doesn't begin to describe the refusal to accept the obvious :-(
Thomas
The entire thing is just silly.
Ironically, initially I really leaned to the assumption that chances were Hex just wandered off like dogs do at times. After seeing the attempts to discredit the investigation, paint any emotional or financial supporter as a hysterical patsy, and what I see as a concentrated effort to shut down the investigation it really does beg the question "why"
>Gee Betty "hysterical patsy" a little melodramatic and paranoid?
>What "concentrated effort to shut down the (private) "investigation"?
>More and more people are just saying read the OFFICIAL reports, listen to the TV interviews.
>So now saying, "look at the facts means" there must be some ulterior motive and "we're" trying to hide
>something?...............................SILLY doesn't begin to describe the refusal to accept the obvious :-(
Thomas
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top