
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by gagsd4 on 06 October 2011 - 00:10
by Blitzen on 06 October 2011 - 00:10
Normal x normal = 100% normal
Normal x carrier = 50% normal, 50% carrier
Normal x at risk = 100% carrier
Carrier x carrier = 25% normal, 50% carrier, 25% at risk
Carrier x at risk = 50% carrier, 50% at risk
At risk x at risk = 100% at risk
These are only approximations based on many more puppies than we would normally see in one litter, so the percentages in any individual litter may deviate from the norm. Carrier x normal could produce all carriers or all normals. It's like tossing a coin 100 times; in the end one would expect 50 heads, 50 tails, but the first 5, 10, even 15 tosses could have been all heads (or all tails). The one fact you can count on - at risk x at risk will always produce 100% at risk and normal x normal 100% normals.
What to do with the dogs that test at risk? If they are breed worthy, they can still be bred with the expected results above. Using only normals will eliminate the gene in 3 generations and will not produce anymore at risks. Each puppy will need to be DNA tested and only the normals retained for breeding. This is probably not a big deal for most GSD breeders since most puppies go to pet homes anyway and it won't matter to a buyer who doesn't want to breed the dog if it is a carrier or a clear. I assume most sell their pets with non-breeding contracts and/or limited registration.
by Blitzen on 06 October 2011 - 00:10
by Czech DDR Lover on 06 October 2011 - 02:10
Dogs who test as carrier/clear will not get the disease.
Dogs who are carrier/carrier may also not show symptoms of the disease, and may die from something totally unrelated without ever showing signs of the disease.
Dogs who have been afflicted with the disease have been confirmed that their DNA has two carrier/carrier DM genes.
At risk dogs for getting the disease (carrier/carrier) can also produce offspring who are CARRIERS ONLY (carrier/clear), when mated to dogs who are Clear/Clear. These offspring will not get the disease nor show any symptoms of the disease.
The true benefit of this test is to know what you are breeding FROM, and what you are breeding TO.
Even excellent breed worthy representations of the breed who may test as carrier/carrier should not AUTOMATICALLY be eleminated from the gene breeding pool...but they SHOULD only be mated to Clear Clear mates. It would then be possible to eventually continue future breedings from this lineage with the prospect of breeding this mutated DM gene OUT. If you don't test at all, you can see how easy it would be to be breeding pairs who are carrier/carrier, without ever knowing since they may not be manifesting any symptoms of the disease during their early breeding years.
by Czech DDR Lover on 06 October 2011 - 02:10
If you have an at risk dog (Carrier/Carrier), even this dog if bred to a Clear /Clear will only, at the worst case scenario, produce Carrier /Clear puppies, (which the whole litter will be) and who will not be at risk for getting the disease.
Pups from these litters will be, at worst, ONLY carriers (carrier/clear).
Litters which result from a carrier/carrier parent with a clear/clear parent would ALL be carrier/clear pups 100%, and even these pups, when bred in the future only with clear/clear mates can go on to produce clear offspring in the future, although testing would be required within each litter to determine who is clear/ clear and who is clear/ carrier. Breeders can choose to keep back only their clear/clear pups, and continue on with this lineage using only the clear clear offspring. By testing litters of carrier pups and keeping back for your breeding programs ONLY those pups who test clear/clear, you will then eventually only produce clear offspring and nothing else.
by waleed on 06 October 2011 - 02:10
thank you
by Czech DDR Lover on 06 October 2011 - 03:10
by Blitzen on 06 October 2011 - 03:10

by BlackthornGSD on 06 October 2011 - 05:10
It's still worthwhile to test for, but it's only snagging part of the problem--at least at this point.

by GSDguy08 on 06 October 2011 - 12:10
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top