Retraction - Page 14

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Myracle

by Myracle on 07 September 2010 - 03:09

Hey Maggie,
Well, after being asked by many dozens of people to completely verify the details about SP, I went through my logs, 2 months worth and did not find him using the security holes I find nor his alleged abuse.
 
The "Dozens" of people Oli is referring to are the people who objected to SP being accused of meddling with the site, which prompted him to review the evidence, rather than simply trust the email allegations.
Nowhere does he state he received complaints from dozens of people about SP meddling with the site.
He received dozens of complaints in SP's defense.

Your misinterpretation of Oli's words does nothing to strengthen your argument.

Read it again.
Shift into your better comprehension mode.



MAINLYMAX

by MAINLYMAX on 07 September 2010 - 03:09

Oli,
        Do people in Iceland act like this, or is just California?
I have a suggestion...You don't have to make up your mind right away.


Fly into California for a week, and spent a couple 2  days at the
 Sock Puppet house hold, and than Me, you ,Ozzy Osborn and Mudwick
hit the City by the Bay. After that you will at least have a foundation to begin
to resolve some of these issues. Than you can stop
in Indiana and see Moons, Whatch the corn grow.... Just kidding Moons,.. you take Oli
out and show him how they burn it up in Indiana.

Sock Puppet

by Sock Puppet on 07 September 2010 - 03:09

Maggie,

I know the details, please be quiet you are really making a fool of yourself. 

Do you honestly believe I did not have my ass covered. 

Please be careful what you say further.

LOL

SP

Ruger1

by Ruger1 on 07 September 2010 - 03:09

              Oli,....Thank you for addressing the forum and clearing up the confusion...

               SP...I will sleep better tonight ....I know you will too....

                                                                                     Ruger1

by VomMarischal on 07 September 2010 - 03:09

One more freaking JOYOUS thing!

NONA WENT BACK AND FIXED ALL HER NASTY LANGUAGE!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!


Dear me, that is absolutely precious!

I ain't fixing mine. Why? I'm not ashamed of one thing I have said to you, Rutavehaus GSD's. I stand by the language I used in reference to you because you are gutter garbage. You DESERVE that language. You think I use it every day in every situation? NO. Just when it is most appropriate, and HONEY, it is appropriate here right here and now.


DDR-DSH

by DDR-DSH on 07 September 2010 - 03:09

Well, Mudwick, you are entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your free speech. These things I do not contest.
I actually respect YOUR rights, even if you do not respect mine.
Fact: I had a struggling / failed kennel business, now eleven years ago.
Fact: I kept all my agreements with the court, as per agreement.
Fact: I took a plea, and yes, technically that is an admission of guilt and technically it is a conviction. However, in my own defense, I am still free to tell MY side of it, if I like. I would rather let it be.. But, I feel that I am being put on the spot continually, even baited, to make comment on this incident, and I usually refrain, especially to specious questions and accusations. I made no gag agreements. I would RATHER have put this behind me and go on with my life (which I should have a right to do), but it is OTHER people who are repeatedly shoving this all in my face, and I believe that their intent is malicious, to cause harm. I FEEL as if I am being harrassed, and perception is one legal condition which must be met to allow a the sufferer to file a complaint. To be more specific, I believe that the posting of an old address (at which I no longer reside, for many years), is inivitation / solicitation of harrassment. I asked the man who now lives there if anything was out of the ordinary, and he said that someone had entered the property. THAT is what I am talking about. HE may be able to file charges, too, if anyone makes a false complaint, and yes.. that is a crime.
You may FEEL certain things and have certain opinions, i.e. that "animal abusers" should wear a scarlet letter on their foreheads or be tracked, harrassed, deinied the right to make a living or gain useful employment and even to have anything to do with animals or children.. You are welcome to your opinion, and you are welcome to your free speech. But, this is NOT the law. The law is the law and not per your opinion. And, you are not allowed to hunt, stalk, harrass, bully, humiliate, defame and otherwise menace someone, just because you do not like them or agree with them. You cannot do that which is not legal, for any cause.
There was absolutely nothing in my agreement with the court that I should never own animals, again. If you do not rsspect the decision of the court, then YOU are the one who is out of line.
It is ancient history. Let it go. I am no longer in the dog business. If you feel that you are compelled to work on social problems, then there are plenty of them needing attention. There is no merit or validity in harrassing anyone, and there are laws on the books regarding cyber bullying.


Sock Puppet

by Sock Puppet on 07 September 2010 - 03:09

Ruger thank you.

These people ruined my weekend but I knew the truth would come through.

The others well......

SP

by Donald Deluxe on 07 September 2010 - 03:09

Mudwick, stop whatever it is you are doing in life and go to law school.  My profession desperately needs more clear-headed individuals these days.

by VomMarischal on 07 September 2010 - 03:09

DDR DSH, JANICE BARTMESS, CONVICTED ANIMAL ABUSER, BATSHIT CRAZY 

nonacona60

by nonacona60 on 07 September 2010 - 03:09

Retraction
by mudwick on 07 September 2010 - 03:09

mudwick

mudwick

Posts: 553
Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2010 11:52 pm
nona,
Those are called ad hominem arguments, and are one of the most common logical fallacies.
AKA- attack the person because you cannot dispute their argument.


So thats the reason incorrect spelling and incorrect grammar use is always pointed out....Or perhaps, the the way sock puppet made up different ways to write our kennel name..... Perhaps that is why VM is now talking about my kennel and what I do, which she knows nothing about.....But since she mentioned my kennel,  why does't she talk about her kennel and what she does in her backyard..Gotta wonder about ignorant idiots like that....






 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top