
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by allaboutthedawgs on 15 January 2007 - 02:01
Over the years I've gotten a couple rescue dogs. Mutts, not german shepherds. And about ten years ago my daughter and I would go and clean cages at the local rescue two or three days a month when some one didn't show up. The only german shepherds I saw there were mildly nuerotic. Maybe they were poorly bred or maybe they just never got the proper chances to develop healthily. As I write this I realize most of the other breeds were dopped off because owners just didn't want to put in the effort. Also, I have heard of people who were willing to try turning around so called nuerotic dogs. So maybe they weren't really unsound at all, just reacting to their past.
So, it's seems people are saying that there's pet quality as in not top performance pups in a litter and then just poor quality dogs having pups. And aiming for no higher than pet quality is what produces the latter?
Maligator,
I didn't cut and paste that to be rude. Just to say I liked the easy going and approachable tone of your post. I realize your statement didn't include poorly bred dogs. Mostly I just wanted a definition of poorly bred vs. pet quality well bred.

by animules on 15 January 2007 - 03:01
by Cassidy Kay on 15 January 2007 - 03:01

by allaboutthedawgs on 15 January 2007 - 03:01
Ok, I think I've finally gotten it. Thanks to everyone for sticking it out.
Dawg
by PJDogs on 15 January 2007 - 16:01
by valentine2 on 15 January 2007 - 21:01

by sueincc on 15 January 2007 - 21:01
by EchoMeadows on 15 January 2007 - 21:01
by valentine2 on 15 January 2007 - 21:01

by sueincc on 15 January 2007 - 22:01
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top