This coming from the religious right. - Page 20

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by beetree on 14 April 2016 - 15:04

@GSD Admin. Good thing I never do that!

GSD Admin (admin)

by GSD Admin on 14 April 2016 - 16:04

Well patting yourself on the back is great and all but the better test is when others pat you on the back.

by beetree on 14 April 2016 - 16:04

@GSD. You won't want to know my reply to that! So, sex talk it is!

Or, none. Later 'Gaters!

GSD Admin (admin)

by GSD Admin on 14 April 2016 - 16:04

Okay, do you think a groin massage is okay to give to a teenager? Say on the swim team.

by beetree on 14 April 2016 - 18:04

@GSD

I need clarification. Please let me know which situation listed below, applies. Then I'll do my best to answer, if applicable.

1. This is a rhetorical question and you don't expect an answer.

2. You agree with some past stated group thinking: that I am Momster of the Year.

3. You want to see if you can provoke me to a snark answer.

4. You want a serious answer.


Hundmutter

by Hundmutter on 14 April 2016 - 20:04

Is it true what I hear, that there is a big Wall
being built right around the White House,
to make sure Enema can't get in ?

mrdarcy (admin)

by mrdarcy on 14 April 2016 - 20:04

lol,lol.

GSD Admin (admin)

by GSD Admin on 15 April 2016 - 04:04

None of the above, just a smart ass

GSD Admin (admin)

by GSD Admin on 15 April 2016 - 06:04

Bee, haven't I told you about a million times you take me way to seriously in OT. Honestly, I do not hold many grudges in real life, I have always been the type to not get to butt hurt over what is said to me. It really takes a lot to even get me mad especially in an OT forum. I think one time in all these years you had me mad at you. Remember my chat melt down. I do. I was mad that day.

GSDtravels

by GSDtravels on 15 April 2016 - 10:04

Someone doesn't understand that it's not the sex acts that are the issue, that it's the hypocrisy of the Republicans who want to be involved with making laws denying equal citizens the pursuit of happiness and judging the sex acts that are "acceptable" to anyone not directly participating in said consensual acts. When you are enacting laws that directly affect freedom of the general population, you should be thrown in jail if you're ever found to be participating in the same behavior that you would deny to others. I can't think of any time I've heard any politician, other than a Republican, telling us that they are going to legislate sex acts of any kind. Can you?






 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top