
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by beetree on 14 April 2016 - 15:04

by GSD Admin on 14 April 2016 - 16:04
by beetree on 14 April 2016 - 16:04
Or, none. Later 'Gaters!

by GSD Admin on 14 April 2016 - 16:04
by beetree on 14 April 2016 - 18:04
I need clarification. Please let me know which situation listed below, applies. Then I'll do my best to answer, if applicable.
1. This is a rhetorical question and you don't expect an answer.
2. You agree with some past stated group thinking: that I am Momster of the Year.
3. You want to see if you can provoke me to a snark answer.
4. You want a serious answer.

by Hundmutter on 14 April 2016 - 20:04
being built right around the White House,
to make sure Enema can't get in ?

by mrdarcy on 14 April 2016 - 20:04

by GSD Admin on 15 April 2016 - 04:04

by GSD Admin on 15 April 2016 - 06:04

by GSDtravels on 15 April 2016 - 10:04
Someone doesn't understand that it's not the sex acts that are the issue, that it's the hypocrisy of the Republicans who want to be involved with making laws denying equal citizens the pursuit of happiness and judging the sex acts that are "acceptable" to anyone not directly participating in said consensual acts. When you are enacting laws that directly affect freedom of the general population, you should be thrown in jail if you're ever found to be participating in the same behavior that you would deny to others. I can't think of any time I've heard any politician, other than a Republican, telling us that they are going to legislate sex acts of any kind. Can you?
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top