
This is a placeholder text
Group text
by Noitsyou on 27 October 2016 - 01:10
@Prager, you really are funny. Name calling? I didn't call anyone names. Oh, the sycophant crybabies at your forum? That was stating a fact. No, you accusing someone of name calling is irony at its finest as you allowed the posters at your forum, and you joined in as well, to violate your rules (hmmm, and you accuse Clinton of not following rules) and call me some rather nasty things. But it's OK for the following reasons:
1. You are emotionally weak and can't stand the idea that someone who is better informed, better educated and smarter than you (let's not even get into how much better looking I am than you) can also out argue you. You like to use philosophical terms, although not always correctly, and see yourself as some guru sharing his vast knowledge with the great unwashed. Too bad I spoil your party with facts all too often.
2. I know that you would never be brave or stupid enough to say those things to my face. All you could do is get your forum cultists to pile on me, which didn't work since it was more amusing to me than annoying, it certainly wasn't hurtful. So you had to resort to banning me to keep the babies from crying all over their keyboards and to make yourself look like the big man. If you can't handle words on the internet then I doubt you are much of a man in person.
But let's get to your post about me not disproving your post. If you were the philosophical genius you claim then you would know that I am under no obligation to prove a negative. A Youtube comment is not an acceptable source for facts. A smart guy like you should know that. See, when you claim something is the real story it's up to you to prove it's real. I know that is the reverse of how things work under communism. Thank god my ancestors created this country for you to escape to but it seems like some habits are hard to break.
It makes sense that you would worship Trump as if he were some white knight since Trump is an authoritarian who doesn't believe in the Constitution. He even wants libel laws changed. I guess I shouldn't expect someone who didn't grow up with certain freedoms and never fought for those freedoms himself, or had ancestors that fought for those freedoms, would respect and cherish them as much as someone who grew up with them and whose ancestors fought to create and preserve them. You can take the man out of the communist country but you can't take the commie out of the man.
And no, you are not getting to me. Remember you banned me so it would seem that I got to you. Don't forget one of the last PMs you sent me over there in which you said a lot of nasty and hateful things, like some teenage girl who was angry with the boy who broke up with her. You didn't even have the courage to post it for everyone to see. In fact, I bet the only reason you post here is because of me. It's a safe space for you to be made to look foolish without the gang over at your forum witnessing it. No Prager, I got to you and still do. But you keep trying. You know what the definition of insanity is?
P.S. No one will read or even be able to read that wall of text you copied and pasted. I doubt you even read it.

by GSD Admin on 27 October 2016 - 15:10

by Prager on 28 October 2016 - 18:10
You said that I did not present proof. Well it can not be more proven then if you get it from the horses mouth. Here you go. Enjoy.

by Prager on 28 October 2016 - 18:10
by Noitsyou on 28 October 2016 - 19:10
Oh, your "proof" doesn't prove the story in your first post to be true. I think you forgot what your original post stated. Stick to preaching to the dolts at your forum who are too dumb to see your non sequiturs and ignoratio elenchi.

by Prager on 29 October 2016 - 02:10

by Prager on 29 October 2016 - 02:10
"The Fair Wages and Healthy Families Act"
This comes down to whether you believe a business owner owns a business or the government owns a business. If you own your own business, then you get to set the wages. Vote NO on government mandated wage levels.
If you believe government has legitimate power to make things "fair," or to set prices where it believes a market should be set, vote YES to force business owners to pay their employees (prices would rise to $12 per hour in 2020).
A YES vote will require employers of certain private businesses to pay employees a minimum wage that rises in four steps until 2020 to $12 per hour. A NO vote leaves the market as it is now.
The bill also requires 40 hours annual “earned paid sick time” for employees of large employers (24 hours for those of small employers); time accrues at one hour earned for every 30 hours worked, with conditions and other time off benefits.
NOTE: The proposal includes some coercion from the unions. Employees are exempt if they expressly waive the benefits under "collective bargaining agreements." In other words, you are encouraged to unionize to get excused from the requirements. It's dirty pool, just thought you should know.

by GSD Admin on 29 October 2016 - 04:10

by Red Sable on 29 October 2016 - 13:10
George Orwell
You speak the truth prager, something these people on here don't want to hear.
God bless you.

by GSD Admin on 29 October 2016 - 15:10
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top