STOLEN DOG - ILLINOIS USA - Page 51

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by sunshine on 18 December 2011 - 06:12

. . . LOL






 

by jax_spader on 18 December 2011 - 09:12

I am addressing miss sunshine

Yours is a very self rightous post and anything but sunshine. 

First off, I don't think I have seen one post by Al Govednik,  AND all that I have seen from Marcia on the facebook pages is where she is thanking people for their support. 

So, since you have not heard one word from the Govedniks how do you know that they are not suffering from regrets???  How can you salt their wounds at this point without feeling like a very mean person?


While you're pointing that finger at the Govedniks how many are pointing back at you?  And I would sure like to know what they are saying.

I know, I know, it takes all kinds but I was

Just Wondering,


PS:
The Govedniks live on a farmette and you just don't see many farmettes in Illinois "fenced".  AND perhaps those that took HEX were waiting by one of the buildings far away from the house or by the tall and very full pine trees on the East side of the house boardering the property.  PERHAPS HEX never went to the road. Perhaps he was never "on" the road. 
gee whizzzzzzzzzzzzz 




M_Asbury

by M_Asbury on 18 December 2011 - 10:12


**

by Dobermannman on 18 December 2011 - 13:12

NickySheltie,
If anyone believes you ever were an Assistant DA or you're "in court all day" based on the spelling, grammar and style of your recent flood of rants? Probably is smoking some of the same Meth that Hex got into.

Hexe,

Anyone can read the Sheriffs report for themselves and come to their own conclusions. Your conclusions are NOT supported by what is actually in the report. You are guessing on why the case is CLOSED. Suggesting that the Sheriffs Office is corrupt or incompetent instead of that Al ihas made inconsistant and inaccurate statements to the Sheriff and news media is an insult to everyone in Law Enforcement.

I repeat my request for ONE person to actually post "my name is John Smith and I personally looked
exactly where Hex was found and he wasn't there a week earlier" just ONE!
A dozen anonymous trolls and sock puppets repeating the same thiing doesn't make it the TRUTH


A positive test for Meth is totally meaningless if you're not told what type of tests were done and the amount and type of "meth" found and where.


Thomas Barriano

by Nickysheltie on 18 December 2011 - 14:12

Hey Jax, Did u hear something? ? I could have sworn I heard something going BLABLABLABLABLABLA

by Nickysheltie on 18 December 2011 - 14:12

Thank You Thomas. A real good laugh is always a great way to start day.

Jenni78

by Jenni78 on 18 December 2011 - 14:12

Sunshine, seriously? 

You sound like a pet rescue application- judgmental, uninformed, and quite callous.

Nicky, even if what you say is "true," your manner of delivery is so juvenile that you are casting doubt on the veracity of it.


Red Sable

by Red Sable on 18 December 2011 - 14:12

"I would not give him a dog of mine without one."

Sunshine, who's to say he'd want a dog of yours?  A little presumptuous aren't we?

Thomas, you seem awfully confident the dog was hit by a vehicle, you'd almost think it was yours.

This thread has gotten ridiculous.  Why don't we all just wait until the final results come in, then which ever side, can say 'I told you so'  16,000 times over and over again.




Chaz Reinhold

by Chaz Reinhold on 18 December 2011 - 14:12

Little Nicky? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=78I281pzcRA&feature=youtube_gdata_player

mewoodjr

by mewoodjr on 18 December 2011 - 15:12

Hexe - very good post.

Why are some intent on beliving one opinion of a reffering vet or report over a preliminary report of meth in the tox screen of Hex? Because they choose to believe some information while discounting the other information. OMG it's a Conspircy! Again it is your opinion, you have a right to that opinion so state your opinion and let it be. Let others have their own opinion.

The family has been counseled to disclose only certain information. Let us not forget who chose to file for and post the police report. I suppose they didn't have an alternative motive? Even a police agency will not tell all the details of a case or death until all results come in. The sheriffs in this case have the right to open or close or re-open a case anytime they choose. Doesn't mean once its closed it closed for good. New information can always come forward. There are a lot of people interested in this and some people are vested in this investigation. The family by morale obligation felt the need to share somthing with the people. You can call it right or wrong. I personally know that the family is acting in good faith. They lost a dear part of their family, and they deserve answers. Does anyone deserve to deny them this?

As for the Govedniks property. They are almost a mile from the Interstate on a county road. They live on a farmette less than 20 acres. They live surrounded by Corn/Bean fields. Nearest neighbor is almost 1/2 mile away. They have a kennel building where the some of the dogs live, Hex was in the house as much as he was in the kennel. So when you ask why did they not have a fence... They live in the country no one has a fence over a property bigger than an acre.

So much of this is a mystery and yet the family has a right to search for answers. They lost a part of their family, They and They alone deserve answers. The rest of everyone... well lets just say that it's none of our damn business, you are not the one who lost a family member. I believe strongly in two things: 1. Treat people as you would want to be treated. 2. Karma is a "female dog".
 
Michael








 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top