
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by momosgarage on 10 June 2011 - 19:06
Thats exaclty what I meant by quality control with the CGC. I have seen many CGC tests where the dog is in a long down, while other dogs are clearly working within a distance I would consider distracting. Like I said taking a CGC with a real AKC judge during "show and go" is not the same as taking it in a sterile Petsmart or Petco retail location with a fly by night CGC evaluator.

by VKGSDs on 10 June 2011 - 20:06
But, the CGC is not comparable, nor do I think it is meant to be.

by Psycht on 10 June 2011 - 20:06
Honestly,Thats exaclty what I meant by quality control with the CGC. I have seen many CGC tests where the dog is in a long down, while other dogs are clearly working within a distance I would consider distracting. Like I said taking a CGC with a real AKC judge during "show and go" is not the same as taking it in a sterile Petsmart or Petco retail location with a fly by night CGC evaluator.
I still do not think they are comparable. Perhaps it is comparable with the traffic portion of the BH but certainly nowhere close to comparable with the obedience portion. The average time the obedience working portion takes is approximately 5-6 minutes so you are roughly double the requirements of the CGC seperation exercise plus the dog does not even have to maintain a position for the supervised seperation in the CGC. Add on the moving sit, down, the recall, and the lengthy heeling and the BH is a whole other ballpark altogether. Yes, there are some CGC evaluators that are more stringent than others but even the most stringent CGC evaluator cannot make the CGC on par with the BH in my opinion. Just my opinion though :-)

by steve1 on 10 June 2011 - 21:06
Steve1

by VKGSDs on 10 June 2011 - 21:06

by VKGSDs on 10 June 2011 - 21:06
by pinkbitesleeve on 11 June 2011 - 00:06
Petco uses whatever space they have available. Be it dock space in the back where they receive their stock, or floor space where they move some things for the duration of the class. They "contract" their trainers, often converting them from regular associates: they'll pay for your training (not sure about the certification, you might just have to do that one on your own, though the fee isn't much, so it wouldn't surprise me if they did pay just so they could offer the Good Citizen course), but then you have to work for them exclusively for a certain amount of time.

by steve1 on 11 June 2011 - 05:06
Many thanks for that, i would think they must have a similar thing in General dog clubs over here, However it is all good training for the dog and owner better than a owner doing nothing with there dogs, and you see that every day. For me there is nothing worse than seeing a dog drag the owner all over the place.
Being me i have to tell the Guy or woman and my usual words are Loose Leash, Loose Leash, but some never know what you are talking about.
Regards one says SCH 3 dogs acting up on such a course . i have never seen problems here
Only a week week Yesterday evening three Guys trained there Dogs on the work field as usual one on a down two working, time was pressing on and usually it is only two dogs, After they finished the Obedience they then walked the Dogs off leash all three up the field and down stopped at a sit. all walked on two gave the Command to Down one to Sit. the dogs were 6 yards apart
The Handlers walked up about 40 paces and turned, stood there for a few seconds
One Called his dog from the Down, the Dog went, The Guy whose dog was sitting walked back to his dog and then came back to the first two Guys with his dog at heel.
When he and his Dog were facing the Dog that was still a Down the Handler called his dog to come to him,. That is what they do at times over here It is a bit of Fun and teaches the Dogs to stay Put until called. You Guys want to try it as it breaks the usual pattern of training.
Steve1

by Jyl on 12 June 2011 - 07:06
http://www.akc.org/events/cgc/training_testing.cfm

by EKvonEarnhardt on 13 June 2011 - 01:06
As a CGC trainer and tester with AKC since 2007 I personally know this first hand.
The CGC test is a way to get pet people involved with their pets. It is a very simple/basic training and testing be to "fun" for the new owner. Basically to get them hooked so they will go with the next class of Rally. Yes, all dogs should be able to pass this, as it was designed for a "PET" and owner. Having a stranger groom your dog is to be the same if you took it to a groomer (most pet people do this) the other part is having the front feet picked up (like clipping nails in real life) Checking the ears (like having a vet check the ears) simple things that a vet would do in real life
Going out for a walk on a loose leash (not being pulled) encounters with strangers, other dogs, noises, all of what a Pet owner will come across in a park setting.
Simple obedience from sit, down and recall all things a owner should train their dog to do. Yes, everything is done on a leash. this is no way advance obedience (like the BH) and the last thing is leaving your dog with a stranger. This is to see if your dog has seperation issues but also if in a emergy or at the vet, someone has to hold your dog for what ever reason will the dog flip out?
Again everything a pet owner would come across.
Now the BH is a route, it is not real life persay in a everyday setting. But it is way more demanding and more time and training is needed. It is harder and more rewarding then a CGC (IMPO) as you know you worked your butt off getting that passing score (if done right).
For me anyone wanting to do "something" with their dog is better then nothing. but there is no comparison between these two IMPO
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top