
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by mentayflor on 02 February 2012 - 13:02
THE MAJOR WANT TO KILL THE POOR DOGGIES AGAIN!!!!!!
SPY IS CHEAPER AND EFFICIENT, WHERE DOGS ARE KILLED THERE ARE OVERPOPULATION
(JANUARY 2012)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L55hkQqYhI4&feature=share

by Sunsilver on 02 February 2012 - 14:02
She finally rescued a year-old boxer/GSD mix from a shelter over 100 miles away. They named him Skippy, and he's a wonderful pet.
So, let's hear it for spaying and neutering! It does work.

by starrchar on 02 February 2012 - 17:02
by Blitzen on 02 February 2012 - 17:02
Way to go, Two Moons. You never disappoint.

by Two Moons on 02 February 2012 - 18:02
you try to equate animals with humans that's simply idiotic.
10 puppies, odds are they did not all live the great life you envisioned, but it made (you) feel good so that's what really matters.
Point made.
Starr,
No animal would have a chance?
My philosophy is quite simple, I am responsible for all animals great and small, for their sake and not my own.
I think people are misguided by propagandists such as Peta and their own selfishness.
Try this,
go deep into the interior of Mexico, a small town without tourism, and get yourself arrested, put yourself into that system.
You will just barely get a taste of what an animal goes through in the shelter system.
Add to that the fear and real smell of death to top it all off.
Walk in anothers footsteps, leave your emotions at the door.
Try to understand the animals you think your protecting.
Stop changing your post starr.
Anyway,
I'm done with it.
Moons.

by starrchar on 02 February 2012 - 19:02
Again, your logic makes no sense to me. What goes on in Mexican prison system is something I have no control over and it will not dictate what I choose to do here in the USA to help either animals or humans. Also, I have seen enough of the animal shelter system here to know that getting them out of there as soon as possible is the best thing for those animals that are adoptable. But, you seem to think killing them is better?
As I said, we will have to agree to disagree.
I am done discussing this with you also. There is no point and it is a waste of my time. As Blitzen, said, you never fail to dissapoint.
Char

by starrchar on 02 February 2012 - 21:02
"Stop changing your post starr." |
I was rushing when I originally typed it. I just wanted to clarify my statement. Why does that bother you?

by Abby Normal on 03 February 2012 - 00:02
you try to equate animals with humans that's simply idiotic.
10 puppies, odds are they did not all live the great life you envisioned, but it made (you) feel good so that's what really matters.
Point made.
Actually Moons I did not equate animals with humans, I was pointing out that the logic principle of the analogy by Starrcharr was the same. 10 puppies rehomed - odds are they did not all live the great life? 10 puppies sold by breeders same odds?
Maybe then you are in fact advocating the PETA approach, if you are saying that most animals cannot be guaranteed a great life. I will tell you this, which someone said to me yesterday, that getting a rescue dog was much harder than simply going and buying a dog from a breeder! This was following a 2 hr interview with me for a puppy. No, it doesn't always apply, many breeders are very discerning, but so are many 'shelters' or 'rescue centres' as we call them in the UK. The point is we try. If you don't try you have accepted defeat. Don't produce any more dogs at all in case they end up in a shelter or are badly treated. Embrace PETA and all it stands for.
by Blitzen on 03 February 2012 - 03:02

by mentayflor on 03 February 2012 - 14:02
http://video.google.es/videoplay?docid=-1042852316039528789&pr=goog-sl#
Is the same with cats (no in Argentina)...
http://www.animalpeoplenews.org/IMPORTANT_MATS/tnrFeral03.html
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top