
This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Jenni78 on 30 March 2011 - 17:03
This looks like a case of just the way the dog is built being considered incorrect, per OFA. They want to see skinny little necks and golf ball round heads (I'm exaggerating some) or else they say "remodeling." Now, how is it "re" modeling if the dog was born that way? That's simply the way the hips are formed, to me. Looks like a heavier boned dog than many others; these seem to get the worst ratings because they don't fit OFA's "ideal."
I have one like this, but much more extreme in bone and less defined in head/neck. No changes from 24mos to 7 years, except they're even tighter than they were. OFA still won't admit that it's just the way the dog is built (massive bone). Oh well. Hope this dog fares better. I would send them to the SV and not bother w/OFA if she were mine.
GSDNewbie, if you look closely, that leg is pulled in a little too far. Picture it in the right place.
by crhuerta on 30 March 2011 - 18:03
Jenni....I agree, I'd send them to the SV. (*my first choice for xrays anyway).

by BlackthornGSD on 30 March 2011 - 19:03

by Jenni78 on 30 March 2011 - 20:03

by Ramage on 30 March 2011 - 20:03

by BlackthornGSD on 30 March 2011 - 20:03

by GSDNewbie on 30 March 2011 - 20:03
by B.Andersen on 31 March 2011 - 04:03
by dbeden01 on 31 March 2011 - 04:03
These hips will pass and are working sound if they do not change with age; personally would rate them “fair”
JMO
Daniela
by Louise M. Penery on 31 March 2011 - 06:03
Contact information Disclaimer Privacy Statement Copyright Information Terms of Service Cookie policy ↑ Back to top