Haughmill Kennels - Page 5

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by scots1 on 26 July 2010 - 08:07

Everyone is actually obsessed.... Well done Haughmill for all this attention! Im awfly jelous!

Haughmill does not need to prove anything to you lot!! Read what you want, say what you want!! At the end of the day, their dogs are looked after, healthy, fed and warm.   Unlike some places that you read up about.  So lay off and go rant at people who batter their pets, starve them etc. i bet you all dont even sponser a dog!???! Yous are all too interested in this and whats happening in the ring or on adverts!! Get out of eachothers ar*eholes and get onto Sponser a Dog.com and put ure money to good use!

Snapper get a grip u!! That will be the last time u call us Vile!!!

Bazza your writing is getting bigger! Do you really think making your font larger we will take you more seriously?? Na!

I didnt know that Haughmills last buisness went down the pan?? MUM, DAD WHAT BUISNESS?? YOU NEVER TOLD ME!!!! BAZZA KNOWS MORE THAN ME??? OH DEAR! PARENTS I THINK WE NEED A CHAT lolololololol

FAO Watcher. - you have just appeard and YOU havent got the story right!  You wrote -
          "even tried to register them in your own names and your trying to say it was a mistake and the KC said you could"
If you read the artical, or even spoken to both parties you will know that Haughmill tried to register the dogs online for quickness...how could you do that by mistake?? And IF you did speak to both parties, you will have obviously read the KC letter stating that they could??!!! Have you read that?? It even says on the Article on Our Dogs that this letter was shown.
  Whats your priorities with your kennels??? im sure Money is one of them!

Frank I am not involved with the breed at all (just want to state that).. I am on here 1. Seeing what people are writing about my family  2. Enjoying the banter because it gets me away from my everyday life. Unlike some of these folk...this is their life, and i bet they only have 2 dogs between them! The same amount of brain cells!

Bye bye for now! Love to all!



 


Haughmill

by Haughmill on 26 July 2010 - 10:07

I am not easily roused to anger - I prefer the more mature emotions like love and pity. I am afraid, however, that I have no love for any of you .... which only leaves pity!

As Carolyne's Mum and Mother-in-law  to Alasdair, I am proud of ALL my family - and DO NOT BOTHER TO COMMENT ON THAT -  this is my first and LAST involvement in this slanderous (YES!  slanderous!) fiasco.    Actually, I am now angry at myself for having been roused to comment and therefore drawn into it.

Unless you can have the courage of your own convictions and actually NAME YOURSELVES. and accept Carolyne's challenge   ....................   then your claims are spurious !!!

I did not intend to comment on any of your specific - and may I say questionable- remarks.   However, I feel so strongly about your whole "campaign"   ...  and that is what this is ...  at least until you find someone more interesting to attack  ...  BUT I must set you right on one of your issues     Carolyne and Alasdair were not "chased out of Beagles" as you so slanderously put it.  In fact for many years they were  the Scottish Officers for Beagle Welfare and rescued many hounds placing them in good "forever" homes.   They  reluctantly CHOSE to come out of  Beagles and leave the show world due to Carolyne's developing illness, from which she is still recovering. 

You have made me do something I have never done before.  I am 77 years old and have never written on a Forum.   This has been forced on me after seeing  my daughter being slowly crushed.     SHAME ON YOU !

The dogs are the love of Carolyne's life and they, and our very close-knit family, have put her on the road to recovery.
LONG LIVE HAUGHMILL !

As Carolyne has done on many occasions I now invite you to come out  into the open and name yourselves -
Why are you afraid to do this?   

I KNOW Carolyne and Ali - I have to say I think I know one of you - and am grateful I know no more!    I am so sorry for the next person you get your teeth into.    (Let's hope that by that time you will have matured enough to get your facts right before starting on another witchhunt!)

OVER and definitely OUT  !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Margaret Cook

funky munky

by funky munky on 26 July 2010 - 10:07

I no longer use this site haven't been here for some time and had no intention of ever using it again, nut feel compelled to speak. After several emails alerting me to this thread, I could not believe what I was told.
I was involved in the last Haughmill saga, and see nothing has changed from that time.
Everything said about these people is true and I and I hope some others still have all the proof. To call these people the liars here is an unbelievable statement, why on earth would we?
Domenic, you most certainly did participate in the last threads, and many more than myself can confirm that. You now claim to have nothing to do with the breed, is there another Domenic Cowan holding the affix RUFFLEE? I loved your claim on your own website " FAMOUS kennel affix Haughmill" did you forget to insert the "in" before the "famous"? I know there were many reputable breeders who commented on the last threads, hopefully they will confirm the lies being told by Haughmill family.
The sad thing about all of this is they will never admit any of this and will continue to call anyone and everyone else the liars, which is totally untrue. I personally do not, know how any of these people sleep easy at night, but maybe if you lie as much as them you believe the lies eventually.  I sleep very easy knowing I spoke out the last time and again now, sadly they will continue blaming everyone else when the lies fall firmly at their feet. 
Jim how are you? Hope all is well with you.     Liz. 


by Dominic Cowan on 26 July 2010 - 11:07

Ok i just have to say one more thing.

Watcher, Clearly you have no clue. My father and i went away for the weekend with British Gas. The dogs didnt pay for it. But it is typical of someone on here to make assumptions. Your 3rd bit about Mrs Grifiths is totally inaccurate aswell. As previous comments from us have stated, None of you know the full truth and are just making your own assumptions to bring us down.

So far, other than jim, all of you are still hiding behind your usernames. Your all avoiding certain questions. Once you all come out with who you really are stop picking on other people.

As for you Snapper, Do you know us personally? Have you met us in person? have you done any buisness with us? If so put in detail where, when and why. I could place a bet your going to be a coward and ignore this little bit.

I did say before that i wasnt going to comment again but this is actually quite fun reading all of your assumptions. Incase you all didnt know, whilst each family member type a comment, we are all smiling and laughing at how pathetic you all must be.

Please continue putting up comments because i have not had this much fun arguing over the internet since i was 11.

Thank you

Dom C 

by Dominic Cowan on 26 July 2010 - 11:07

Where does it say i have nothing to do with the breed Funky munkey?

And also you are the second person to spell my name wrong which kind of proves my point when i say,

ACTUALLY READ THINGS BEFORE YOU SAY ANYTHING!

I mean if you cant even get a name right then you cant possibly get anything else right.

Dom C

jaymesie51

by jaymesie51 on 26 July 2010 - 11:07

 Hi Liz i am good thanks hope you are ok to. To Carolyns Mum i have named myself always have since i joined this site so going by what you have said in your post i will take it that you believe me and that my claims are not spurious but then you probably wont the difference here is i still have all the proof of your daughters lies that were in her adverts and on her web site i also spoke at length with Marjorie Pryde who your daughter claimed to have been an inspector out to check her kennels when in fact she was only there to ascertain if a breeders license was needed but dont take my word for it phone Marjorie and speak to her yourself, 
jim h


by Watcher on 26 July 2010 - 15:07

Although they liked the puppies they were too costly at time time. Mrs Griffiths subsequently contacted them and offered a puppy in partnership at half the original cost. Mrs Griffiths suggested they take two pups (Mr Cowan liked one and his wife another) home with them and that the puppy price on the contracts be noted as £500 each.

Hmmm.......nice big fancy website, lots of different breeds, a shop selling food and goodies and can go away for weekend racing cars (you mentioned it because i as had already pointed you believe you have some status in this world) yet you can't afford 2 dogs, isn't a simialr story you tell to other breeds when trying to get their animals.

After a long delay they got the registration papers through and proceeded to register them online. To allow the addition of their own affix Mr Cowan contacted the KC who advised him to re register the dogs in their name only, add the affix and then register in joint names as agreed originally.

 It was brought to Mrs Griffiths’ notice by the KC on 19th Jan 2009 that the dogs were registered as being owned solely by the Cowans, which was contrary to her wishes and the official registration document she had supplied. She asked why they had registered online and he replied that they had shows to enter so this was the quickest way.

Mrs Grifiths then asked why they had not followed the original route and if they had a supporting document from the KC telling them of the order in which to change the registrations. She pointed out that several entries had been incorrectly made and indeed at Windsor the dogs had been entered solely in the name of Cowan. Mr Cowan explained to the Sheriff that his wife did the entries and she had hoped that by that time they would be the sole owners of the dogs. The Sheriff then said they had ‘jumped the gun’ somewhat.


Mrs Griffiths then asked again why, when they were in receipt of a legal KC document did they ignore it and continue to enter on line. She read an email from Mrs Cowan apologising for this oversight.




Interesting that you once said your family was involved with breeding dogs for over 100+ years yet don't seem to know how Joint ownership works but you do seem to know how try to deceive people out of their dogs by lying to them.

Spouting all the bs that you and your family are doing on here just shows exactly as i said previously priorities lie and it sure isn't with your animals. You just like to put on some kind of show for people and you think they are dumb enough to fall for it.


Just as before you get caught because your not good enough liars to get away with it and YOU say i lied.






 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top