No wonder Schutzhund people have a bad reputation - Page 3

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Feather on 25 August 2010 - 20:08

Sunsilver, any modern trainer unless they are ignorant looks down on Koehler those methods are outdated and cruel.  He recommended all kinds of torturous and abusive methods.  If a dog diggs a hole he said fill the hole with water and hold his head under until he is sure he will drown.  I'd hate to be your dog if you read old books for the 1970s on how to break a dog in,  for barking, beat the dog with a belt.  You wont be able to do well in schutzhund if you use methods like this, you won't have a dog thats happy to work.  Plety of schh trainers with more positiv less abusive methods can tell you

Very outdated http://www.k9densolutions.com/History_of_Dog_Training.html

this ideas of dominance are also outdated, http://dogpublic.com/articles/article.aspx?sid=14&pid=1640


yoshy

by yoshy on 25 August 2010 - 20:08

why does everyone seem to feel that any negative stimulus is a correction and or is wrong?

dog training is about understanding the concepts of pressure how to apply it and when to release it to appropriate teach a concept. this holds true with teaching any behavior! a training aid is just that- whether it be some for of reward or a devise used to help create negative pressure. there are those people in all venues misuse both. however to reach a degree of reliability with any dog in any venue both positive and negative pressure are necessary. Though different dogs require varying degrees of pressure to learn.

Any negative reinforcer used is training is using the dogs natural escape and avoidance to reinforce an undesired behavior. any positive reinforcer is used to communicate to the dog it is engaging itself in an appropriate behavior.

so once again through pressure the dog is learning what is appropriate and what is inappropriate. The degree in which pressure is applied positive or negative can vary greatly from dog to dog!

take for example: the use of an ecollar. since it seems most are against them.

on a low level or appropriate level stim (shown by the dog reactions)  you apply continual pressure until the dog reaches a desire behavior such a sitting. pressure stops. behavior is marked. reward follows.

this is using the dogs natural escape and avoidance of negative pressure to find the correct position to relieve pressure. and achieved reward. the dog will start to offer this behavior much faster through more repetitions as it wants to escape or avoid negative pressure and achieve reward. this also teaches failure is not an option. following once the behavior is learned and in the latter stages of training in the proofing phase it will become a correction for refusal. through this you obtain a 100% reliable sit.

no one baked a dog or did anything harmful. but the dog understand implicitly that it must obey and and complete the command given by its handler.

nature provides wild animals with pressure. by understanding it how wild animals learn. so why is it any different for a dog though it is domesticated its primal instincts are still present and learns in the same manor.

----------------------------------------

for the positive only crowd- if you are in the Maryland area i have 2 personal dogs i will gladly invite you to take a crack at. one is a hard gsd that came to me with a multiple bite record on humans and dogs whom was scheduled for the needle. and the other is a brutal mali bitch.

funny story- i had my mali bitch out at 9 months and was working her in a park. i was approached by a so called professional positive only trainer with her golden. This lady proceeded to ridicule me for have my dog on a training collar and that she could show me how to train a dog the "right way". Playing dumb i entertained this lady and allowed her to evaluate my dog. I was very quickly counseled that she was to dangerous to own and should be put down. After this i informed her i was also a professional trainer and that would never happen! Needless to say she is still alive and kicking and is one of my up and coming PSA dogs.

its also funny i receive at least a client or two every few months that some so called trainer has counseled them to euthanize their dog or they went to them for months with no results.



 


yoshy

by yoshy on 25 August 2010 - 20:08

I would also like to address the bashing of the koehler method. in his time it was the best formulated training program. His methods were used to train millions of dogs to a high level of success from pet dogs to movie dogs- to war military dogs!

Many have not seen the true representation of his methodology. It will bring a hard dog down to a biddable level or can be used to bring a soft or fearful dog up to workable level if the pressure is applied and released appropriately. Though i do not follow his protocol to the letter a modified khoeler program can still offer a lot in many cases. His methods also have produce more working titles of dogs than any other to date and are still in practice by many top trainers. There is one man whom (not mentioning name as there are crazies here) that is a top field retriever trainer located not far from me. He has multiple national field trial champions- multiple client national field trial champions- and titled dogs in nearly very venue offered in the us, has been awarded military training contracts, and trained 1000's of real world working and pet dogs. and still uses khoelers applications.

And there are others as well.

So basically maybe you should consult someone that knows what they are doing before you bash something you dont understand!



Sunsilver

by Sunsilver on 25 August 2010 - 20:08

Parts of the book are over the top, and abusive, yes. I said that in my first post. But don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. His chapter on teaching heeling is very good, and every trainer I've worked with uses a variation of his core ideas.

You MUST have the dog focused on you. Some people achieve that by treats, some by having the dog fastened to their waist. A recent book I borrowed recommended you do it by stopping every time the dog forges ahead. Kohler did it by changing direction every time the dog forged ahead. 

Also, with basic commands, you repeat the command ONCE, then give a physical correction (assuming the dog already knows the command.) None of this 'sitsitsitsit' stuff you hear so many people doing.

edit: excellent post, Yoshy.




by GSDdrive1 on 25 August 2010 - 20:08

Well said Yoshy. Good trainers recongnize that every dog is different. There are various tools available such as a prong or ecollar, and the various methods of applying corrections mentioned in this post. It is up to the trainer to assess what tools are needed for each dog and at what level they need to be applied.

Your story about your Mali bitch is a good one, and provides a great example of how different dogs can be. I have a very hard female GSD. She can be extremely hard headed, especially when she is in high drive. Often a strong correction is the ony way to get her attention. She is my first true working dog and I had no clue how different they could be from the pets I have owned previously, including both GSDs and Dobermans. Strong corrections with an e-collar, pinch, or a good hard hit to the head does not deminish our relationship. She is by far the happiest dog I have ever had. Prior to this I might have agreed that some of the methods used could be considered cruel. For anyone participating on this post, unless you have walked in these shoes with this type of dog don't be so quick to judge, because like the "professional trainer" Yoshy described you are making judgements without truly understanding what you are judging.

 


yoshy

by yoshy on 25 August 2010 - 20:08

edit

Sunsilver

by Sunsilver on 25 August 2010 - 20:08

The dogs in this video were trained entirely with the clicker method. One of them, Sarlot, the vizsla is the service dog of the lady who made the video:

www.youtube.com/watch

www.youtube.com/watch


Okay, I agree with you. Some hard-headed, strong dogs require a firmer hand. But that is still no excuse for abuse. And it's not the method that's abusive, but HOW it is applied. Heck, being too gentle with a dog can be 'abusive' if it results in the dog winding up in the shelter for biting someone!

And I believe Kohler makes EXACTLY that point in the opening chapters of his book...

by Gustav on 25 August 2010 - 20:08

Lee, good post!!
I really think this is one of those cases of a person that doesn't know and doesn't know they don't know. This is a person who has said on another thread that military trainers are no good, on this thread they have said that AKC obedience is higher than Sch obedience. My point is I would assume from these statements that this person has trained in the military, titled a dog in Sch and titled a dog in AKC obedience. IF this is the case the person has a point of reference for these statements, otherwise they are just spouting off stuff they have heard and maybe done a little AKC work.JMO

Sunsilver

by Sunsilver on 25 August 2010 - 21:08

Yoshy, good question.

You could try witholding food until the dog decided those treats looked pretty darned tasty.

You could use a clicker to 'mark' the behaviour you wanted, then reinforce it with praise.

When my puppy is too stressed to want a treat, I gently guide her into a sit, etc. then give her lots of praise and affection.

ALL dogs are motivated by something, or else they're dead. You jsut have to experiment until  you find the right motivator.

The trainer I'm working with gave me a paper that described how to motivate a dog with a toy. You make that toy seem SO darned special (by playing with it yourself, and not letting them have it) that it can't WAIT to get its paws on it.  IIRC, Leerburg does something very much like this in the beginning stages of training schutzhund.

I'd be interested in hearing other suggestions. Come on, let's turn this into a learning opportunity instead of the usual bashing and name-calling!

Steve Schuler

by Steve Schuler on 25 August 2010 - 21:08

Hey There Feather!

I'm a pretty mellow and gentle guy, and really not a very advanced dog trainer by my own admission, but this post of yours only evidences your own lack of even a sub-elementary understanding of dog training.  Are you for Real or merely Trolling?

SteveO

PS

Bill Koehler's books were my intoduction to the theory and practice of dog training, but not the endpoint.





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top