Why Do People Breed GSD's W No Titles And KkLs???? - Page 1

Pedigree Database

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

Premium classified

This is a placeholder text
Group text

by Minka on 12 June 2009 - 11:06


What is the point of showing your dog as a young pup till it gets to the18-24 month old class, Then you stop and just breed the crap out of it. Also telling people that the parents are SchH1 or 2,3 and not telling them that the dogs dont have their KkLs. This is so important for the breed and people just dont care, its all about the money. why??? why ????

by Haus Simpkins on 12 June 2009 - 11:06

Its more imortant to the sport then the breed...
schutzhund is not the be all end all. at best its a sport and a choreographed routine.
i have seen many of police dogs worthe breeding, ring sport, knpv, psa and there are no Koerungs for these.

Kalibeck

by Kalibeck on 12 June 2009 - 12:06

Also to note-it costs a small fortune these days to obtain titles, koers, etc.,- I think more would comply if the process was a little more user friendly. Can't offer any suggestions on how to improve it, however.....it's just one of those things! jh

by Bob McKown on 12 June 2009 - 12:06

 What is good for the sport most often isn,t good for the breed, That being said if you look thru some of the breeds most outstanding  producing lines you will find untitled non kkl dogs. But one should aspire to always benefit the breed,  I do disagree it would benefit the breed if all dogs were Titled and KKL but I,ll look at the dog before I look at the titles.

Red Sable

by Red Sable on 12 June 2009 - 12:06

Yup, to what Bob said.


by Nikos on 12 June 2009 - 13:06

people that deal with  k9s dont 'have the time to title or koer their dogs... they just want a dog that can work; most schutzhund dogs can't work the streets and the sport dogs are nowadays mostly prey, i'd say 90% prey, and rest aggression, and I might be too generous. true working dogs need to be more balanced in their drives, and I don't think you can find that today in many of the schutzhund fields... jmo
 


Videx

by Videx on 12 June 2009 - 14:06

 I understand the SV are considering substantial chages to the current requirements for breeding qualification. They apparently understand the onerous requirements of the current ststem. If they amended the Korung, it maybe that the Schutzhund title, if desired could be done later than the Korung. A simplification of the SV system would certainly encourage more countries to adopt it. The RSV2000 have introduced a more simplified system for breeding qualification. I would hope the UK will adopt a similar approach through the proposed "accredited GSD scheme".

by eichenluft on 12 June 2009 - 14:06

I believe there should be working-title and conformation-rating requirements for breeding.  Schh1 and G in conformation rating is the current minimum requirement for SV - I follow these guidelines - KKl is not required by SV but is a good "bonus" for a breeding dog to have IMO.  As a breeder I would certainly consider Police K-9, Herding, SAR certification, or advanced obedience etc as working titles for my program.   I think anyone who says Schutzhund is not a good test of the dog for breeding, is making excuses as to why they themselves are not breeing titled dogs in their program - excuses as to why they cannot or will not title their own breeding dogs -

If you know what you are looking for, there are plenty of excellent working dogs, balanced in drives and temperament, working in the sport of Schutzhund.  If you know what you are looking for, you can find excellent breeding dogs in the sport.  Just don't look on the podium, for the most part.

molly

by Bob McKown on 12 June 2009 - 14:06


 Well stated Molly.

Silbersee

by Silbersee on 12 June 2009 - 14:06

A Koerung without a SchH title would be like a ZtP (Zuchttauglichkeitsprüfung) which is fine, but I am not an advocate of it. It waters down the breeding requirements and gives people more excuses not to title their dogs.
Yes, some dogs with titles should not be bred and other dogs without a breed survey are definitely breed worthy.
But keep in mind that working titles (other than SchH which was initially developed as a breedworthiness test) are done in competition or work and usually have nothing to do with breedworthiness under the SV system of working and survey breedings.
A breed survey also checks the dog's correctness (dental, size, structure etc.). This is simply not guaranteed when you breed to a workingdog (without show rating and survey). And if you are going to tell me that it does not matter I beg to difer. It certainly does matter if a dog for example has full dentition, a correct scissors bite, is over- or undersized and - if male - has both family jewels. All these aspects are taken care of in a breed survey.
But here in the U.S., it is up to the informed buyer to purchase a wellbred puppy or not, since there are no requirements set forth other than what the individual breeder voluntarily does.
Chris





 


Contact information  Disclaimer  Privacy Statement  Copyright Information  Terms of Service  Cookie policy  ↑ Back to top