DH--- FORUM RULES QUESTION? - Page 1

If you are the moderator, why do you get involved in the idle gossip? You violate the rules you try to enforce? Don't delete my message...I really want a clear delineation about what is acceptable behavior and what is not. Once that is clear, hold everyone to the same ethics.

Quoting DH "Sch.... you are getting old. Did you not post that same garbage above somewhere? Lost track of it. You too seem to be at a loss for oringal new words. IQ = your dogs obedience score?" This is something a moderator writes??? You need to turn in your keyboard.

What makes you think I am a moderator, Sue-Ann? Shiloh was simply asking why his post was removed since he thought it was sticking to the rules. I simply quoted a few reasons why he was not. Just like anyone on this board could have. Since this was a personal attack on me, a continued and unsubstantiated and unproven attack, and this person saw it necessary to place the post in an area where the moderator cannot remove it, to me this person has at that point violated everything this site is meant to be. And you know what honey, without wanting to be disrespectful to you here, but I do not need to take this sh*t. If you cannot understand that, walk in my shoes, maybe then you do. Are you trying to say that I should just sit here and have other people bash me, hurt my friends who are totally innocent of any of the accusations and NOT be able to do anything about it? Because of how poorly this site is run, there is not really anything else that can be done, than to show people how silly the allegations are. Or take legal action against the site owner. Lawyers in Iceland are not that hard to find, even lawfirms that specialize in internet law and yes they do speak English. Wonder how I know this? As I said before, if someone would abuse this board to publish kiddie porn all hell would break loose. Regarless of what the TOS say about owners not being held responsible for content, it also states that everyone is responsible for their own content. That is what you agree to when you sign in for your log-in name. If such serious and harmful allegations are made, then maybe it is time to get to the bottom of this, get the individuals particulars and sue them. Slander and the like will automatically waive the privacy protection of such persons. But, dear Sue-Anne. Caution here. Next you know, you are also another supposed alias of mine... and part of the whole shabang. Just out to work my cause for me. Oh, and of course I have your password and post under your ID. :o)

BTW - a perfect score in B would put one right there at the average, the norm, wouldn't it? Nothing to get upset about. All of matter of interpretation.

Hi Sue-Ann, I formed views on DH's machinations over some time and have yet to see any indication that my conclusions are incorrect. Please accept that what's occurred recently is not in any way novel. DH is a dog broker whom through own admission tried to obtain formal control over this venue some time previous. You'd appreciate that such control represents many-hued possibilities, if not a potent weapon to augment dog trading, promote connections and friends or damage competitors and so forth. (Or even merely to 'teach a lesson' to a anyone critical or dares to step 'out of line'! Failing to do so, she attempts instead to exercise a de-facto dominance by various means and to varying degree: as you may readily grasp, she can hardly do so solely under her own tag and thus the need for a number of user names and mutually self-serving 'friends'. As said, little is new here: she's launched a number of personalized assaults against specific parties in the past, and the script is basically the same for each episode: the instant anyone points out her quite obvious involvement or orchestration she defuses and confuses her own participation by sending in her 'witch-hunt' aliases and 'troops' with drawn-out ridicule and endless vicious absurdities to ostracize/annihilate the opposition until every member here becomes, inevitably, sick of the whole affair! This is then followed by heart-tugging or pseudo-outrage sentiments of misunderstood innocence (and whatever else she can throw-in!) - black becomes white - and order is restored until her next vicious personal attack! This is usually also characterized by 'wonderful' new posts in order to signify her precious worth to the forum and/or new 'pretend topics', and with associates getting together in some new thread for a congratulatory show of victory! The fact that DH may have lost her sportstuff (Dan Heckett) because of re-programming may well be the driving motivation behind earlier Missing Nut topic, but this is only conjecture on my part! I really have no idea how many aliases she's resorted to but names that have been thoroughly discredited in the past (and some more than once) include Wolf 1, sportstuff, Konigtum, Kreighauser, Nicos, GSDMan, GSDLaw, GSDLawsuite and topdogs. I'm also completely convinced that Blitzen and 'Charlie Ivory' names are now shared with original owners thereof. DH urged caution I believe Sue-Ann: I couldn't agree more! To be subjected to 'low-life' destruction by her and cronies is not an experience to be relished!

Instead of repeating your self over and over again,why do you not share your proof? Show me one time she logged on as me,just once........can you even do that?

Maybe yo can find it and post it here?I have a few things to do,I'll check back

Sue-Ann, I'm merely one more member like any other. The only way one could possibly provide two plus two scientific 'proof', and as DH is better aware of than anyone else, would require owner access to the whole system. In fact, if one has above average related knowledge, it would not be too difficult to make it extremely awkward even for the owner or moderator to be really certain where a particular entry originated! I believe that a written report detailing the repetitive circumstances of each past episode - with print-outs of related entries etc, together with a birds-view explanation of larger setting - would easily stand the test of any civil tribunal. I simply like to see this worthwhile forum operate without too much glaring skullduggery!

Fact 1 - I have NEVER launched any personal attacks on this forum, other than against those who attack me first. Fact 2 - I submit to this forum only under this ONE SINGLE log-in! I had one other set up that was created at a time this forum was down and I could not log in under DH. This was also used to place ads for friends who could not sign in themselves at that time. Since the problems described have disappeared there has been no reason to sign in under that name, which is Topdogs. At NO TIME have I ever posted anything under a login different to those described, that includes using the log-in of one of the people that are already subscribed here. Fact 3 - many people have offered to buy this site off Oli, who is not interested in selling. I, like so many others, have asked ONCE if he is interested in selling, that was years ago. This is a free world after all, isn't it? Fact 4 - this site is full of anonymous freaks who operate through scaremongering techniques and spew their venom from the hidden holes they live in. They are too cowardly to come out into the open and show themselves. Posting IP addys on this site with each submission would quickly remedy that. Fact 5 - none of the log-ins that have made similar allegations have been able to submit any substantial proof to their claims to this date. All heresay and wishful thinking of some sick, freightened, moronic, bitter mind.

Civil tribunal? More like a lynch mob! I thought the Spanish Inquisitions had ended long ago. Get with the times. Why don't you contact the owner then and get the proof? Apparently this is so important to you. Important enough to just keep on bashing me, or important enough to actally get some facts straight? Get the wood out people, someone is out for another witch hunt, with a colourful burning in mind. Nothing else.